Motor vehicles – With means for promoting safety of vehicle – its occupant or... – Responsive to absence or inattention of operator – or...
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-30
2001-02-20
Johnson, Brian L. (Department: 3618)
Motor vehicles
With means for promoting safety of vehicle, its occupant or...
Responsive to absence or inattention of operator, or...
C180S269000, C180S271000, C180S272000, C340S540000, C340S541000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06189646
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to power machinery. More particularly, the present invention relates to an apparatus for controlling operation of a lockout system for power machinery.
Power machines, such as skid steer loaders, typically have a frame which supports a cab and a movable lift arm which, in turn, supports a work tool such as a bucket. The movable lift arm is pivotally coupled to the frame of the skid steer loader by power actuators which are commonly hydraulic cylinders. In addition, the tool is coupled to the lift arm by another power actuator which is also commonly a hydraulic cylinder. An operator manipulating the skid steer loader raises and lowers the lift arm, and manipulates the tool, by actuating the hydraulic cylinders coupled to the lift arm, and the hydraulic cylinder coupled to the tool. When the operator causes the hydraulic cylinders coupled to the lift arm to increase in length, the lift arm moves generally vertically upward. Conversely, when the operator causes the hydraulic cylinders coupled to the lift arm to decrease in length, the lift arm moves generally vertically downward. Similarly, the operator can manipulate the tool (e.g., tilt the bucket) by controlling the hydraulic cylinder coupled to the lift arm and the working tool to increase or decrease in length, as desired.
Skid steer loaders also commonly have an engine which drives a hydraulic pump to, in turn, power hydraulic traction motors which power movement of the skid steer loader. The traction motors are commonly coupled to the wheels through a drive mechanism such as a chain drive.
It is desirable that, under certain circumstances, the lift arm, the tool, the traction mechanism, or all three, be rendered inoperable. For example, in some prior devices, when an operator leaves the cab of the skid steer loader or assumes an unconventional operating position, the hydraulic cylinders used to raise and lower the lift arm are locked out of operation. In such prior devices, an operator presence switch is coupled to the hydraulic circuit controlling the hydraulic cylinders to render the hydraulic lift cylinders inoperable when the operator presence switch indicates that the operator is in an unconventional operating position. One example of such a system is set out in the Minor et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,389,154.
In addition, in some prior devices, movable operator restraint bars are provided. When the operator restraint bars are moved to a retracted or inoperative position, mechanical brakes or wheel locks lock the wheels of the skid steer loader. One example of such a system is set out in the Simonz U.S. Pat. No. 4,955,452.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is drawn to a control system on a power machine which includes a first sensor sensing a first operating condition and providing a first sensor signal. An operator actuable override mechanism provides an override signal in response to actuation thereof. A controller is coupled to the first sensor, a power circuit, a traction lockout mechanism, and the override mechanism. The controller is configured to instate a lockout condition in response to the first sensor signal. The controller selectively overrides the lockout condition based on the override signal, and the first sensor signal.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2606626 (1952-08-01), Meyer
patent: 3215221 (1965-11-01), Rayman
patent: 3340523 (1967-09-01), Whitman
patent: 3449714 (1969-06-01), Farley, Jr.
patent: 3455410 (1969-07-01), Wilson
patent: 3487451 (1969-12-01), Fontaine
patent: 3500946 (1970-03-01), Boyajian
patent: 3507350 (1970-04-01), Boyajian
patent: 3740711 (1973-06-01), Bell
patent: 3749866 (1973-07-01), Tiazkun et al.
patent: 3787804 (1974-01-01), MacDonald
patent: 3788431 (1974-01-01), York
patent: 3790223 (1974-02-01), Fontaine
patent: 3838748 (1974-10-01), Gray et al.
patent: 3864668 (1975-02-01), Bickford
patent: 3892294 (1975-07-01), Nieminski
patent: 3912939 (1975-10-01), Quantz et al.
patent: 3927776 (1975-12-01), Steiger
patent: 3960235 (1976-06-01), Iijima
patent: 3986093 (1976-10-01), Wakamatsu et al.
patent: 4019602 (1977-04-01), Habiger
patent: 4034335 (1977-07-01), Harazoe et al.
patent: 4053868 (1977-10-01), Cox et al.
patent: 4059196 (1977-11-01), Uchino et al.
patent: 4091889 (1978-05-01), Brown et al.
patent: 4096468 (1978-06-01), Kopera, Jr.
patent: 4103842 (1978-08-01), Martin et al.
patent: 4116296 (1978-09-01), Pleier et al.
patent: 4172980 (1979-10-01), Hsieh et al.
patent: 4267544 (1981-05-01), Wiblin
patent: 4285418 (1981-08-01), Paine
patent: 4296410 (1981-10-01), Higgs et al.
patent: 4313519 (1982-02-01), Lipschutz
patent: 4317500 (1982-03-01), Bening
patent: 4320819 (1982-03-01), Erker
patent: 4344502 (1982-08-01), Terabayashi
patent: 4355698 (1982-10-01), Barnes et al.
patent: 4361741 (1982-11-01), Leskoverc et al.
patent: 4371741 (1983-02-01), Ando et al.
patent: 4385863 (1983-05-01), Minor
patent: 4388980 (1983-06-01), Vig et al.
patent: 4389154 (1983-06-01), Minor et al.
patent: 4391344 (1983-07-01), Weber et al.
patent: 4392544 (1983-07-01), Dilno
patent: 4397371 (1983-08-01), Lynnes et al.
patent: 4398618 (1983-08-01), Hansen
patent: 4466504 (1984-08-01), Giandenoto et al.
patent: 4480713 (1984-11-01), Macht et al.
patent: 4546266 (1985-10-01), Zenick et al.
patent: 4550597 (1985-11-01), Drutchas et al.
patent: 4579191 (1986-04-01), Klee et al.
patent: 4655313 (1987-04-01), Hicks
patent: 4673054 (1987-06-01), Burke et al.
patent: 4706194 (1987-11-01), Webb et al.
patent: 4727353 (1988-02-01), Ruhter
patent: 4759185 (1988-07-01), McConnell et al.
patent: 4796013 (1989-01-01), Yasuda et al.
patent: 4844196 (1989-07-01), Clevenger, Jr. et al.
patent: 4856612 (1989-08-01), Clevenger, Jr. et al.
patent: 4871044 (1989-10-01), Strosser et al.
patent: 4902039 (1990-02-01), Kawai et al.
patent: 4909560 (1990-03-01), Ginn
patent: 4951963 (1990-08-01), Behr et al.
patent: 4955452 (1990-09-01), Simonz
patent: 4955455 (1990-09-01), Albright et al.
patent: 5050700 (1991-09-01), Kim
patent: 5109945 (1992-05-01), Koga
patent: 5129478 (1992-07-01), Suenaga et al.
patent: 5203440 (1993-04-01), Peterson, Jr. et al.
patent: 5425431 (1995-06-01), Brandt et al.
patent: 5542493 (1996-08-01), Jacobson et al.
patent: 5551523 (1996-09-01), Berg et al.
patent: 5577876 (1996-11-01), Haeder et al.
patent: 5664637 (1997-09-01), Ohta et al.
patent: 5711391 (1998-01-01), Brandt et al.
patent: 5931254 (1999-08-01), Loraas et al.
“Fluid power in action: mobile equipment”, by R.T. Schneider, Aug. 1993,Hydraulics&Pneumatics, pp. 29-30.
“Hand Pump Series HP 101”, brochure, Feb. 1994, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Elvira, Ohio, 2 pages.
Brandt Kenneth A.
Jacobson Scott B.
Clark Equipment Company
Draper Deanna L.
Johnson Brian L.
Westman Champlin & Kelly P.A.
LandOfFree
Traction lock/momentary override does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Traction lock/momentary override, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Traction lock/momentary override will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2585929