Food or edible material: processes – compositions – and products – Surface coating of a solid food with a liquid
Patent
1997-01-24
1999-03-02
Cano, Milton
Food or edible material: processes, compositions, and products
Surface coating of a solid food with a liquid
426 72, 426103, 426 96, 426455, 476474, 476476, 118 19, 118 24, 427422, 99516, A23G 326
Patent
active
058767754
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to a food processing apparatus and methods of using such apparatus. More particularly, the present invention is directed to an improved apparatus for applying a topical coating such as a sugar coating solution to a Ready-To-Eat breakfast cereal base using a secondary source of moisture and a plastic drum.
2. Background of the Invention
A wide variety of operations, especially food processing, involve the application of a fluid coating material. In particular, the preparation of certain presweetened Ready-To-Eat ("R-T-E") breakfast cereals involves the application of a sticky sugar coating solution or slurry to a prepared R-T-E cereal base. The wet, sugar coated R-T-E cereal is subsequently dried and packaged to form the finished product.
Conventionally, the sugar coating solution or slurry is applied to the R-T-E cereal base with conventional spray nozzles that dispense the slurry in a spray pattern using only the hydrostatic pressure of the slurry supply to form the spray. The nozzles are typically mounted within an R-T-E cereal base enrober. A good description of such coating apparatus and techniques is given in "Breakfast Cereals and How They Are Made" (edited by R. B. Fast and E. F. Caldwell), American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., 1990, pg. 200-220. Such an enrober is an apparatus having a rotating horizontally extending vessel or drum, generally cylindrically shaped, although the axis may be at a slight angle relative to the horizontal, frequently having a lower discharge end. The cereal base is fed at one end and is discharged at the opposite end. As the vessel rotates and as the slurry is dispensed within the enrober, the slurry is evenly applied, more or less, as the cereal is tumbled within and travels along the axis of the enrober. While useful and effective, the ease of conventional hydrostatic slurry restrictive orifice discharge nozzles has numerous disadvantages.
One disadvantage involves the gradual build-up of the slurry upon the interior of the enrober vessel. After this build-up of sugar, the enrober must be thoroughly cleaned. Depending upon a variety of factors, the cleaning operation must be conducted at least once per day and perhaps as frequently as once per operating shift. Cleaning the enrober is thus a standard element of operating hygiene that usually takes up to an hour to perform. Thus, slurry build-up requires the direct cost of maintenance servicing. More importantly, since most cereal processing lines are generally continuous, slurry build-up can cause the more significant cost of downtime of the entire cereal processing line.
Still another problem with the use of conventional restrictive orifice nozzles involves the evenness of the slurry distribution over the cereal base. Of course, an evenly distributed slurry is desired. Using conventional nozzles, improved evenness of distribution can be obtained by greater tumbling (e.g., faster rotation and/or increased residence time in the enrober). However, many R-T-E cereals, especially those in flake form, are fragile. Greater tumbling leads to the development of broken flakes or fines that subsequently must be screened out. Fines generation can lead to yield losses of up to 5% or more of the cereal line's capacity.
Still another problem is undesirable product agglomeration. Undesirable product agglomeration can be aggravated by poor slurry distribution. Undesirable product agglomeration can result in the generation of large, unattractive, hard pieces that should be screened out.
Still another benefit resides in the reduction in the amount of expensive sugar ingredients lost as part of the sugar build-up that must be washed away during enrober cleaning. Still another advantage resides in reduction in undesirable product agglomerates.
Surprisingly, dramatic improvements in the sugar solution coating of R-T-E cereal has been obtained utilizing an enrober including a drum having a hydrophobic material internal surface, steam assisted slurry nozzles and/or an air at
REFERENCES:
patent: 1292351 (1919-04-01), Jones et al.
patent: 1374938 (1921-04-01), McNulty
patent: 2335116 (1943-11-01), Hensen
patent: 2513081 (1950-06-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2726959 (1955-12-01), Lushbough et al.
patent: 2915024 (1959-12-01), Kruger et al.
patent: 2991015 (1961-07-01), Standlick
patent: 3157361 (1964-11-01), Heald
patent: 3199790 (1965-08-01), Giesemann
patent: 3470831 (1969-10-01), Von Drachenfels
patent: 3557717 (1971-01-01), Chivers
patent: 3587974 (1971-06-01), Rosenkranz
patent: 3615676 (1971-10-01), McKown
patent: 3623669 (1971-11-01), Woods
patent: 3677808 (1972-07-01), Sheridan
patent: 3748150 (1973-07-01), Fulger
patent: 3976793 (1976-08-01), Olson et al.
patent: 4032667 (1977-06-01), Kreuter
patent: 4079151 (1978-03-01), Schade et al.
patent: 4093188 (1978-06-01), Horner
patent: 4169545 (1979-10-01), Decker
patent: 4262847 (1981-04-01), Stitzer et al.
patent: 4283012 (1981-08-01), Hanson
patent: 4293570 (1981-10-01), Vadasz
patent: 4294868 (1981-10-01), Kalbskopf et al.
patent: 4422574 (1983-12-01), Mancuso, Jr.
patent: 4614490 (1986-09-01), Kiczek et al.
patent: 4617872 (1986-10-01), Melliger
patent: 4619843 (1986-10-01), Mutsors
patent: 4645127 (1987-02-01), Emory et al.
patent: 4658754 (1987-04-01), Messner et al.
patent: 4668180 (1987-05-01), Newman
patent: 4676437 (1987-06-01), Brown
patent: 4743456 (1988-05-01), Spadafora et al.
patent: 4755390 (1988-07-01), Calandro et al.
patent: 4760956 (1988-08-01), Mansfield
patent: 4840493 (1989-06-01), Horner
patent: 4850705 (1989-07-01), Horner
patent: 4856453 (1989-08-01), Verrico
patent: 4909420 (1990-03-01), Reyner
patent: 4925107 (1990-05-01), Brown
patent: 4934445 (1990-06-01), Plata et al.
patent: 5005514 (1991-04-01), Verrico
patent: 5012975 (1991-05-01), Korsmeyer
patent: 5069118 (1991-12-01), Berqquist et al.
patent: 5219097 (1993-06-01), Huber et al.
patent: 5302201 (1994-04-01), Lucke
patent: 5370734 (1994-12-01), Ierrevo
patent: 5403395 (1995-04-01), McCullough et al.
patent: 5453383 (1995-09-01), Roufs et al.
Article, Popular Mechanics, May 1993, p. 57, "Airless Sprayer".
"Breakfast Cereals and How They Are Made," ed. by Robert B. Fast and Elwood F. Caldwell, American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., 1990, pp. 195-220.
"New Spray Nozzles Can Wash Problems Away," Food Processing, Jul. 1994, pp. 55-59.
Behnke Ronald J.
Dawes Derek D.
Godsey Gregory L.
Hurd Ronald D.
Roufs John G.
Cano Milton
General Mills Inc.
Kamrath Alan D.
Lillehaugen L. MeRoy
O'Toole John A.
LandOfFree
Topical coating applying apparatus and methods does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Topical coating applying apparatus and methods, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Topical coating applying apparatus and methods will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-420156