Brushing – scrubbing – and general cleaning – Implements – Brush or broom
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-18
2004-11-02
Lam, Cathy (Department: 1775)
Brushing, scrubbing, and general cleaning
Implements
Brush or broom
C015S167200
Reexamination Certificate
active
06810550
ABSTRACT:
The invention relates to a toothbrush, consisting of a brush head with bunches of bristles arranged in an elongate bristle bed and a handle connected with the bristle bed by way of a connecting part, wherein the bunches of bristles have a length varying in wave shape in longitudinal direction of the bristle bed.
In the case of the horizontal manner of cleaning normally used by the user with known toothbrushes a good cleaning effect is indeed achieved, since the moving filaments of the toothbrush produce a rapid distribution of toothpaste at the tooth and wipe the toothpaste over the surface of the teeth, whereby surface contaminants are picked up, dispersed and thus eliminated. However, in use of a toothbrush with a usual planar bristle field the interdental regions which are particularly cariogenic are left out, as the bristles have no contact with the tooth surface in such tooth interstices.
There is therefore known from EP 0 619 711 B1 a profile, which extends sinusoidally in longitudinal direction of the bristle bed, of the bunches of bristles of a toothbrush, in which the points of maximum amplitude substantially coincide with the gaps formed between the teeth of the user. All bristles have rounded ends in order to avoid harm to teeth and gums by sharp edges. An improvement in cleaning effect in the interdental region is thus achieved, since the elevated bristles are better able to penetrate into the depressions of the tooth interstices.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
However, in the case of cleaning the outer side of the teeth the edge of the gum is strongly stressed, which is not only unpleasant, but can also lead to injury to the gum notwithstanding the rounded bristle ends. This applies particularly when a stronger pressure on the toothbrush is exerted for improvement in the cleaning effect. The user therefore avoids vigorous brushing of the outer side of the teeth, with the result that not only the outer side of the teeth and the edge of the gum, but also the interdental region are cleaned only to an inadequate degree. The same applies to the inner side of the teeth.
A further disadvantage of the known toothbrush, as well as toothbrushes with an entirely planar bristle field, resides in the fact that a large part of the applied toothpaste leaves the bristle field unused even after the first brushing motions and is no longer able to contribute to the cleaning.
The invention has the object of developing a toothbrush with an enhanced cleaning performance, particularly for the tooth interstices, but also for the gum edge.
According to the invention this object is met in the case of the toothbrush of the kind stated in the introduction in that first bunches of bristles are arranged at the two outer sides of the bristle bed and have split bristle ends and substantially the same length and that second bunches of bristles, which have a length varying in wave shape in longitudinal direction of the bristle bed, are arranged between the two outer sides of the bristle bed.
Due to the outwardly disposed first bunches of bristles with split bristle ends the edge of the gum is stressed significantly less, so that the user does not shy away from brushing with increased pressure, so that a thorough cleaning of the outer side of the teeth and above all the teeth interstices is achieved by means of the inner bristles formed in wave shape. At the same time, the split bristle ends of the outwardly disposed bunches of bristles clean the edge of the gum particularly gently and thoroughly by the high number of filament ends and distribute the toothpaste particularly effectively at the surface of the tooth and the gum. Thus, a significant feature of the invention is the combination of inner bristles having a length varying in wave shape with outer bristles having frayed, thus split, ends.
The first and second bunches of bristles consist of the same or a comparable material, namely of high-grade synthetic materials, particularly Nylon 66 or similar. The diameter of the bristles (filaments) preferably lies at 0.1 to 0.25 mm, especially at 0.15 to 0.225 mm. Each bunch of bristles comprises forty to sixty bristles, wherein in the case of the so-called anchor method twenty to thirty bristles are preferred.
Moreover, it is proposed on the one hand that the upper ends of the outwardly disposed first bunches of bristles are arranged above the lowermost ends of the inwardly disposed second bunches of bristles. On the other hand, it is of advantage if the upper ends of the outwardly disposed first bunches of bristles extend beyond the highest ends of the inwardly disposed (short) second bunches of bristles by at most 1 mm and in particular extend at most up to the highest ends of the inwardly disposed (long) bunches of bristles.
Several advantages with respect to improvement in the cleaning effect are thus achieved. Firstly, the outwardly disposed bristles are sufficiently short in order to allow the inner bristles to be effective for cleaning the interdental regions and the outer sides of the teeth. In the case of too-long outer bristles a “stilt effect” would in fact occur so that the ends of the inner bristles would no longer have contact with the outer sides of the teeth and in particular with the teeth interstices. Secondly, the outwardly disposed bristles are, however, also of sufficient length to prevent contact of the inner bristles with the edge of the gum. Thirdly, the outer bristles limit, by a minimum length of that kind, the “wave troughs” formed by the inner bristles, so that the toothpaste delivered to the inner bristles is available for a longer time for improving the cleaning performance and does not leave the bristle field as quickly as in the case of conventional toothbrushes.
In addition, it is proposed that the depth of splitting of the outwardly disposed first bunches of bristles is up to 4 mm, especially up to 2 mm. Moreover, it is of advantage if five to ten outwardly disposed first bunches of bristles are provided per row of bunches.
The inwardly disposed second bunches of bristles preferably have a length (depth of cut), measured from bristle base up to the ends, of 8 to 14 mm, especially 9 to 12.5 mm. For achieving a particularly good cleaning performance it is proposed that the length difference of the second bunches of bristles lies at 1 to 2 mm. The ends of the second bristles are—by contrast to the split ends of the first bristles—not split, but rounded off in order to ensure an additional security against harm to the gum.
It is preferred, moreover, that the inwardly disposed second bunches of bristles are arranged in rows extending transversely to the longitudinal axis of the bristle bed, wherein one to two rows of bristle bunches with short bristles, especially with the same bristle length, alternate with one to two rows of bristle bunches with long bristles, especially with the same bristle length. In order to achieve an optimal cleaning performance, the region of the short bristles, measured in longitudinal direction of the bristle bed, between the adjacent long bristles should have a length of 6 to 10 mm.
Further advantageous refinements of the invention for enhancement of the cleaning effect of the toothbrush, which relate not only to the first bunches of bristles, but also the second bunches of bristles, are stated in the following. The spacing between the centre points of adjacent bunches of bristles, measured at the bristle base, should amount to 1.5 to 3.5 mm, especially 2.0 to 3.0 mm. With this spacing such a flexibility of the bunches of bristles is achieved that the cleaning performance is further improved during cleaning of the teeth. Moreover, it is preferred that twenty to thirty inner bunches of bristles, especially twenty-three to twenty-eight bunches of bristles, are provided.
Further important refinements of the invention which concern the general construction of the toothbrush and contribute to meeting the object in accordance with the invention are explained in the following. The ergonomy of the toothbrush is particularly important for a good cleanin
Kosmetatou Yvette
Vetter Ruediger
Wuelknitz Peter
Harper Stephen D.
Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien
Hill Gregory M.
Lam Cathy
Murphy Glenn E. J.
LandOfFree
Toothbrush does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Toothbrush, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Toothbrush will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3320352