Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer-to-computer protocol implementing – Computer-to-computer data transfer regulating
Reexamination Certificate
2006-08-01
2006-08-01
Dharia, Rupal (Department: 2141)
Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput
Computer-to-computer protocol implementing
Computer-to-computer data transfer regulating
C709S203000, C709S219000, C709S239000, C709S243000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07085848
ABSTRACT:
A method of reducing bandwidth limitations to send events to a set of interested clients within a pre-defined time period as quickly and fairly as possible. The clients can be re-distributed among the servers in a network such that the delay due to server overloading is minimized by moving clients from an overloaded server to a server with available bandwidth. In addition, the latency of client-server communications can be incorporated into an estimation of download times, and the servers can then initiate delivery to respective clients based on those download times. By staggering the send times to account for heterogeneous latencies, more clients can receive the event at the same time, and a fairness of distribution can be achieved.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5920701 (1999-07-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5978381 (1999-11-01), Perlman et al.
patent: 5991306 (1999-11-01), Burns et al.
patent: 6061722 (2000-05-01), Lipa et al.
patent: 6223286 (2001-04-01), Hashimoto
patent: 6275496 (2001-08-01), Burns et al.
patent: 6298373 (2001-10-01), Burns et al.
patent: 6324182 (2001-11-01), Burns et al.
patent: 6370688 (2002-04-01), Hejna, Jr.
patent: 6842768 (2005-01-01), Shaffer et al.
patent: 2001/0014103 (2001-08-01), Burns et al.
patent: 2001/0018713 (2001-08-01), Takeshi et al.
patent: 2001/0056416 (2001-12-01), Garcia et al.
patent: 2002/0018484 (2002-02-01), Kwang et al.
patent: 2002/0056010 (2002-05-01), Lincoln et al.
patent: 2003/0065810 (2003-04-01), Ims et al.
patent: 2003/0121050 (2003-06-01), Kalva et al.
patent: 2005/0021467 (2005-01-01), Franzdonk
patent: 1 035 703 (2000-09-01), None
patent: WO 98/57275 (1998-12-01), None
patent: WO 01/46782 (2001-06-01), None
patent: WO 01/69848 (2001-09-01), None
patent: WO 01/97467 (2001-12-01), None
patent: WO 02/17559 (2002-02-01), None
Pulido et al., “SM: Real-time multicast protocols for simultaneous message delivery,” inProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications, Hiroshima, Japan, Oct. 27-29, 1998, pp. 66-73 (IEEE Computing Society, 1998).
Tanaka et al., “A key distribution and rekeying framework with totally ordered multicast protocols,” inProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Networking(ICOIN '01), Beppu City, Japan, Jan. 21-Feb. 2, 2001, pp. 831-838 (2001).
Akyildiz et al., “Multimedia Group Synchronization Protocols for Integrated Services Networks,” IEEE Journal, (14), pp. 162-173, (1996).
Carter et al., “Server Selection Using Dynamic Path Characterization in Wide-Area Networks,”IEEE Journal, pp. 1014-1021, (1997).
Xu et al., “Synchronized End-To-End Multicast In Real-Time Packet Cellular Networks,”IEEE Journal, pp. 431-435, (1998).
Cabrera Luis Felipe
Padmanabhan Venkata N.
Dharia Rupal
Microsoft Corporation
Nguyen Quang N.
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks P.C.
LandOfFree
Time-window-constrained multicast using connection scheduling does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Time-window-constrained multicast using connection scheduling, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Time-window-constrained multicast using connection scheduling will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3706984