Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis – Bone
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-17
2004-10-12
McDermott, Corrine (Department: 3738)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Implantable prosthesis
Bone
C623S020210
Reexamination Certificate
active
06802865
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a femoral component which co-operates with a tibia plate, eventually including the interposition of an insert or tibia meniscus applied to said tibia plate, as well as a knee prosthetic including a femoral component of this type.
2. Description of the Related Art
According to the prior art, femoral components include a trochlea and at least one, but preferably two, condyles and a trochlean trajectory is defined by said trochlea within the external surface of said component. Said femoral component also includes a set of internal flat sides, the purpose of which is to make contact with the corresponding re-cut sides of the distal extremity of a femur, said internal flat sides being implemented within the internal surface of said component and the combination of which defines internal edges.
In order to apply tibia prosthetics of the type described above, notably when it is preferable to anchor a femoral component of the type described thereabove to the proximal extremity of a femur, the extremity of said femur is initially cut or re-cut. Generally, said re-section is carried out such that the extremity of the femur includes a plurality of sides separated between themselves by edges. One of said sides is preferably perpendicular to the axis defined by the femur, whereas the other sides are tilted relative to said one of said sides.
Similarly, when implementing said prosthetic, the tibia must also be re-cut an one side located at the distal extremity of said tibia, which is preferably perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tibia.
For a given knee prosthetic, the medial side and the lateral side of said prosthetic is defined. The lateral medial side is the side parallel to the tibia axis and also includes the axis of the other tibia. The medial side is therefore the side of the prosthetic located on the side of the other prosthetic or the other healthy knee of the patient and the lateral side is therefore the side located on the outside of said patient, relative to said given prosthetic.
When a tibia is cut following what is known in the art as a neutral cut as previously defined, i.e. a cut which forms a flat side perpendicular to the axis of the tibia, more bone is taken off the upper lateral side of the tibia than the upper medial side of said tibia. However, the neutral out of the femur results in the same quantity of bone taken off both the medial and lateral condyles. Consequently, there exists a trapezoidal volume between the re-cut tibia and the femur as opposed to a parallelogram before the prosthetic is manufactured and applied. Indeed, the distance between the tibia and the femur perpendicularly to the lateral side of the re-cut tibia side is greater than the same distance on the medial side.
This trapezoidal volume is a disadvantage. Indeed, its existence may result in a medial collateral ligament too tightly wound or a lateral collateral ligament to loosely wound. Consequently, in order to avoid the formation of said trapezoidal volume, an external rotation of the femur is implemented when attaching said femur. As the femur is turned, more bone is taken off at the medial level than at the lateral level such that a rectangular volume is created. However, a plurality of disadvantages result from the above external rotation of the femur, notably when a cutting operation results in more medial bone being taken off than lateral bone;
1) Firstly, the proximal trochlean trajectory is laterally skewed whereas the dovetail is distally brought back towards the medial side when the femur is turned externally. Thus, once the prosthetic is applied, the truchlea moves in the medial direction across a middle line when the knee is bent. The fact of “medialising” the trochlean trajectory may contribute to an incorrect positioning of the trochlea whilst it moves, which may therefore engender pain, a fracture, a loosening or premature wearing.
2) Moreover, it would also be reasonable to turn the tibia externally in order to align the femur and the tibia in a stretched position of the knee when the femur is turned externally. The base plate of the tibia prosthetic may therefore extend beyond the bone, such that a surgeon must implement a smaller tibia component in order b avoid this situation. If a small tibia prosthetic is implemented, the general cover of the bone will be reduced, which should also be avoided.
3) Moreover, the femoral components of the tibia must be aligned relative to a rotation over a comprehensive domain of movements in order to reduce the wearing of the polythene material of the insert located in-between. Indeed, when both the femoral and tibia components are externally turned, the contact area between the femur and the tibia is maximised when the knee is extended but decreases as said knee is flexed, i.e. the congruence becomes less adequate.
If the tibia component is located according to a neutral location with a femoral component turned eternally, the congruence is reduced when the knee is flexed but increases as the knee extends. Therefore, the contact area is maximised when the knee is flexed but reduced when said knee extends. Thus, independently of the orientation of a tibia component, the congruence cannot be maintained within the entire flexing domain when the femur is externally turned. The above eventually becomes a very important factor or parameter with knee implementations requiring high confirmation.
Implementing an external rotation of the femur removes more bone on the anterior lateral side and thus increases the probability of a notch forming up. This may weaken the femur to breaking point, which should be avoided.
5) Finally, an inappropriate removal of bone from the anterior medial femur may create a space between the prosthetic and the bone and thus compromise the correct positioning of the prosthetic.
A particular prosthetic is known which is described in the German utility model number G 89 11 095.1 in the name of Miehlke, amongstprosthetics according to the prior art. In this prosthetic, the edges of the cages are tangentially parallel to the condyles in their most distal part, and the trochlean trajectory is tilted relative to a perpendicular line extending from said tangential plane (or reference line defined by the condyles when they are resting horizontally).
A particular prosthetic known according to the prior art is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,105 in the name of Ries. The edges are also tangentially parallel to the condyles in their most distal part and the trochlean trajectory is perpendicular to this plane, with a bevelled insert located between the tibia plate and the condyles in order to best fill the trapezoidal space shown in FIG.
1
.
Another femoral prosthetic of the known prior art is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,326,361 in the name of Hollister. In the specification, the cage (the edges) is tilted relative to the tangential plane defined by the condyles (or reference line) and the trochlean trajectory is also tilted relative to a perpendicular line extending from said tangential plane. Finally, the prosthetic described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,103 in the name of Kaufman teaches a cage which is tangentially parallel to the condyles and a trochlean trajectory tilted relative to a perpendicular line extending from said tangential plane.
The present invention proposes to solve the above described disadvantages and notably proposes a new femoral component which solves the problem that arises from the neutral re-section of the tibia, i.e. the presence of a trapezoidal space between the re-out tibia and the re-out femur without implementing an external rotation of the femur when it s re-out.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, the disadvantages that arise from the external rotation of the femur are remedied as said external rotation is not required anymore and, at the same time, the ligament collateral to the prosthetic is not subjected to a variable stress between the medial side and the lateral side
Biegun Jean-François
Marceaux Pascal
Aesculap
Landrem Kamrin R.
McDermott Corrine
LandOfFree
Tilted femoral component does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Tilted femoral component, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Tilted femoral component will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3313077