Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis – Bone
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-27
2001-09-11
Willse, David H. (Department: 3738)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Implantable prosthesis
Bone
Reexamination Certificate
active
06287343
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains to surgical procedures for stabilizing the spine. More particularly, this invention pertains to a novel implant for use in such a procedure.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Chronic low back pain is one of the most common and perplexing problems facing the field of orthopedic surgery. In addition to patient discomfort, chronic low back pain has severe adverse societal impacts including lost income, possible chronic dependence on drugs, alcohol and public relief programs.
In many cases, low back pain can be avoided by preventing relative motion between spinal vertebrae (commonly referred to as intervertebral stabilization). To abate low back pain, stabilization is directed to stabilizing contiguous vertebrae in the lumbar region of the spine.
Surgical techniques are known for use in spinal stabilization. Surgical techniques seek to rigidly join vertebrae which are separated by a degenerated disk. Ideally, the surgery effectively replaces the vertebra-disk-vertebra combination with a single rigid vertebra. Various surgical techniques have developed which attempt to approach or approximate this ideal.
One technique known in the art is to partially remove a degenerated disk and to insert a bone graft into the void formed by the removed disk. Other techniques involve the use of an implant which, acting alone or in combination with bone fragments, replace the use of bone grafts. An example of such implant is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,269 to Bagby dated Feb. 26, 1985. In Bagby, a large, cylindrical basket is driven into a hole formed between bones which are to be joined. The basket is hollow and is filled with bone fragments which are produced during a boring step. Bone-to-bone fusion is achieved through and about the basket. In Bagby, the hole for the Basket is slightly smaller than the diameter of the basket. This structure results in the spreading of the opposing bone segments upon insertion of the basket. This results in taughtness, which provides initial stabilization. Eventual fusion of the opposing bone segments results from bone growth through the basket.
Prostheses such as that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,269 are promising. However, improved implant design is necessary to enhance patient safety and the probability of a satisfactory recovery.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, an implant is disclosed for insertion into a body formed between opposing vertebrae of an animal's spine. The implant includes a rigid body having a leading end and a trailing end spaced apart along a longitudinal axis of the body. The body has exposed threads which are disposed between the leading and trailing ends. The threads are selected to engage vertebra material and draw the body along the direction of the axis upon rotation of the body about the axis. The body defines a chamber which is exposed through the body by a plurality of radially extending openings. The chamber may be filled with bone fragments which can fuse with the vertebra bone material through the openings. In one embodiment, a reinforcing rib is provided within the body.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention disclosed herein, a generally oval-shaped implant is disclosed which is hammered into an elongated bore between two opposing vertebrae. The oval-shaped implant has enhanced surface area contact between the vertebrae and provides greater integrity against rotational motion between opposing vertebrae.
REFERENCES:
patent: 16151 (1856-12-01), Cole
patent: Re. 31865 (1985-04-01), Roux
patent: 376427 (1888-01-01), Cassidy
patent: 817042 (1906-04-01), Burns
patent: 1079630 (1913-11-01), Baum
patent: 1409825 (1922-03-01), Brush
patent: 2677369 (1954-05-01), Knowles
patent: 3260150 (1966-07-01), Colman
patent: 3298372 (1967-01-01), Feinberg
patent: 3426364 (1969-02-01), Lamb
patent: 3848601 (1974-11-01), Ma et al.
patent: 3867728 (1975-02-01), Stubstad et al.
patent: 3875595 (1975-04-01), Froning
patent: 4011602 (1977-03-01), Rybicki et al.
patent: 4044508 (1977-08-01), Frederick
patent: 4140432 (1979-02-01), Heule
patent: 4162867 (1979-07-01), Calcaterra et al.
patent: 4259072 (1981-03-01), Hirabayashi et al.
patent: 4309777 (1982-01-01), Patil
patent: 4328593 (1982-05-01), Sutter et al.
patent: 4332036 (1982-06-01), Sutter et al.
patent: 4349921 (1982-09-01), Kuntz
patent: 4369769 (1983-01-01), Edwards
patent: 4401112 (1983-08-01), Rezaian
patent: 4468200 (1984-08-01), Münch
patent: 4479491 (1984-10-01), Martin
patent: 4484570 (1984-11-01), Sutter et al.
patent: 4501269 (1985-02-01), Bagby
patent: 4553273 (1985-11-01), Wu
patent: 4554914 (1985-11-01), Kapp et al.
patent: 4569338 (1986-02-01), Edwards
patent: 4573448 (1986-03-01), Kambin
patent: 4589414 (1986-05-01), Yoshida et al.
patent: 4596243 (1986-06-01), Bray
patent: 4599086 (1986-07-01), Doty
patent: 4603694 (1986-08-01), Wheeler
patent: 4612922 (1986-09-01), Barber
patent: 4636217 (1987-01-01), Ogilvie
patent: 4644951 (1987-02-01), Bays
patent: 4646738 (1987-03-01), Trott
patent: 4653481 (1987-03-01), Howland et al.
patent: 4657550 (1987-04-01), Daher
patent: 4686997 (1987-08-01), Oloff et al.
patent: 4690595 (1987-09-01), Heule
patent: 4696292 (1987-09-01), Heiple
patent: 4714469 (1987-12-01), Kumma
patent: 4714478 (1987-12-01), Fischer
patent: 4743256 (1988-05-01), Brantigan
patent: 4756649 (1988-07-01), Heule
patent: 4772287 (1988-09-01), Ray et al.
patent: 4782833 (1988-11-01), Einhorn et al.
patent: 4834757 (1989-05-01), Brantigan
patent: 4840633 (1989-06-01), Kallabis et al.
patent: 4878915 (1989-11-01), Brantigan
patent: 4936848 (1990-06-01), Bagby et al.
patent: 4936851 (1990-06-01), Fox et al.
patent: 4961740 (1990-10-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5015247 (1991-05-01), Michelson
patent: 5026373 (1991-06-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5055104 (1991-10-01), Ray
patent: 5489308 (1996-02-01), Michelson et al.
patent: 26 28 443 (1976-12-01), None
patent: 27 26 297 A1 (1978-12-01), None
patent: 29 31 508 (1981-02-01), None
patent: 35 05 567 A1 (1986-06-01), None
patent: 0 307 241 A2 (1989-03-01), None
patent: 1 392 615 (1965-02-01), None
patent: 988281 (1983-01-01), None
patent: 1519677 (1989-11-01), None
patent: 1526675 (1989-12-01), None
patent: 1600755 (1990-10-01), None
patent: 85/02535 (1985-05-01), None
patent: 87/07827 (1987-12-01), None
patent: 88/06023 (1988-08-01), None
“Basket Implant Facilitates Spinal Fusion,”Orthopedics Todaypublication date unavailable.
Page from unidentified German article with attached English translation.
Butts et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of a New Method for Spinal Innerbody Fixation” Dec. 1987.
“POROCOAT, A Technical Review of Porous—Coated Implants for Biological Fixation,”DePuy Success Through Innovationno publication date.
Otero, “Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion with Threaded Cylindrical Bone,”Journal of Neurosurgery, 63:750-753, Nov. 1985.
“Ray Cervical Threaded Fusion Cage,”Surgical Dynamics, (14 pages) 1994.
Bagby George W.
Corin James Donald
Kuslich Stephen D.
Merchant & Gould P.C.
Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.
Willse David H.
LandOfFree
Threaded spinal implant with bone ingrowth openings does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Threaded spinal implant with bone ingrowth openings, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Threaded spinal implant with bone ingrowth openings will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2506481