Refrigeration – Gas compression – heat regeneration and expansion – e.g.,...
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-19
2001-11-13
Capossela, Ronald (Department: 3744)
Refrigeration
Gas compression, heat regeneration and expansion, e.g.,...
C062S467000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06314740
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a regenerative thermoacoustic energy converter (TAEC), comprising an acoustic or mechanical-acoustic resonator circuit and a regenerator clamped between two heat exchangers.
Generally, a TAEC is a closed system in which in a thermodynamic circle process heat and acoustic energy, i.e. gas pressure oscillations, are transformed into each other. TAECs have a number of properties, which make them very suitable as heat pump, e.g. for refrigeration or heating, or as engine for driving pumps or generating electrical power. The number of moving parts in systems that are based on TAEC is limited and in principle no lubrication is needed. The construction is simple and offers a large freedom of implementation allowing the manufacturing and maintenance costs to be low. TAECs are environmentally friendly: instead of poisonous or ozone layer damaging substances, air or a noble gas can be used as the heat transfer medium. The temperature range of operation is large, thus allowing a large number of applications. Owing to the closed system, the external noise production is low; besides, the frequency spectrum is limited, so that, if necessary, adequate measures can be taken to minimise noise nuisance and vibrations.
A regenerative TAEC comprises an acoustic or acoustic-mechanical resonance circuit, in which a gas is present, as well as two heat exchangers, on both sides of a “regenerator” of a pourous material with good heat exchange properties. Assuming that the gas, having a certain temperature, is already in oscillation, heat is moved, under the influence of the acoustic wave, from the one heat exchanger, the entrance heat exchanger, to the other, the exit heat exchanger.
A TAEC can be used as a heat pump or as an engine. In the former case mechanical energy is added, by which the gas is brought into oscillation by means of e.g. a membrane, bellows or a free piston construction; by means of the oscillating gas heat is then “pumped” from the one heat exchanger to the other. In the latter case, as an engine, heat is supplied to the one heat exchanger and heat is drained at the other, whereby oscillation of the gas column is kept up; the gas movement can be coupled out as useful energy through the membrane. Said heat pump can also be driven directly without intervention of a membrane and E/M converter by said engine, by which a heat pumping system driven by heat comes about without any moving parts at all. From the patents referred to hereafter, TAECs are known as “pulse tubes”, characterized by a so-called thermo-acoustic stack with a limited heat exchange and heat exchangers with a length greater than or equal to the local extension amplitude of the gas. In order to enlarge the refrigerating capacity, according to said patent, the pulse tube is provided with one or more “orifices”, exit openings or bypasses of small diameter, connected to a buffer. As a consequence of such a controllable leak”, the phase shift between gas pressure and velocity at the location of the stack is reduced and the impedance is lowered, thus increasing the heat pumping capacity. In fact, there is question of an RC network. True enough the capacity is increased by such an RC network, but because of energy dissipation in the resistive component of the network (orifice), the net efficiency is negatively affected.
From patent applications referred to hereafter regenerative TAECs are known as “travelling wave heat engines”, characterised by a regenerator included in a travelling wave resonator. The value of the impedance at the location of the regenerator in a travelling wave resonator is relatively low, causing the influence of the flow resistance in the regenerator to be dominant. The efficiency is hereby adversely affected.
The present invention aims at increasing the capacity of a TAEC in a way wherein the efficiency loss observed in said exemplary embodiments does not or hardly take place and the net efficiency is much more favourable then in known TAECs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a TAEC, comprising an acoustic or acoustic-mechanical resonator circuit with included therein a regenerator with heat exchangers, in which the regenerator is provided with a bypass, formed by a (loss free) delay line or acoustic induction (inertia). It is known from, among others, documentation to which is referred hereafter (Ceperly), that for an optimum operation of the regenerator a real impedance has to reign herein, i.e. that the gas pressure (p) and the gas velocity (v) have to be substantially in phase with each other. Furthermore, the value of the impedance in the regenerator has to be high relative to the characteristic impedance of the medium, in order to limit the influence of the flow resistance. As will be appreciated, in a resonator the gas pressure (p) and the gas velocity (v) are circa 90 degrees out of phase.
By adding said bypass a pressure difference (dp) over the combination of bypass and regenerator comes about by lead time or induction (inertia), which is about 90 degrees out of phase with the original gas velocity (v) in the bypass or resonator respectively. The gas velocity in the regenerator is proportional to the pressure difference (dp) over said combination. Since in this way a phase shift of circa 90 degrees takes place twice, the net gas velocity in the regenerator is again almost in phase with the gas pressure (p) in the resonator, thus meeting the requirement of an almost real impedance.
For a bypass in which because of lead time or induction a phase shift &phgr; takes place, this can be understood as follows: If we describe the pressure at the entrance of the bypass as p
1
=p.e
j.&ohgr;.t
then the pressure at the entrance of the bypass is p
2
=p.e
j.(j.&ohgr;.t−&phgr;)
The time average pressure difference over the bypass is thus equal to
&Dgr;p={overscore (p)}
1
−{overscore (p)}
2
={overscore (p)}.(1−e
−j.&phgr;
)={overscore (p)}.(1−cos &phgr;−j. sin &phgr;)
From this it shows that for small values of &phgr; this pressure difference is circa 90 degrees out of phase with the gas velocity (v) in the bypass and resonator. Because the net gas velocity (v) in the regenerator is proportional to this pressure difference, the gas velocity in the regenerator will also be circa 90 degrees out of phase with the gas velocity in the resonator and thus in phase with the gas pressure in the resonator.
It shows that for small values of &phgr; at the location of the regenerator an almost real impedance is created, the absolute value of the impedance in principle only being dependent on the value of the phase shift (&phgr;). By varying this phase shift by lead-time or induction in the bypass, the absolute value of the impedance in the regenerator can be varied over a large range and be set in such a way that the influence of the flow-resistance is no longer dominant and that both a high capacity and a high efficiency are obtained.
Since the delay line hardly adds any additional wall surface area to the total system and is not dissipative by nature, almost no additional losses are introduced. However, in practice always a parasitary flow resistance will come about. To minimise the influence of the former, the thickness of the viscous boundary layer (dv) has to be negligibly small compared to the diameter of the bypass. The thickness of this boundary layer (at atomsferic pressure) is given by the practical formula d
1
={square root over (2.1+L /freq)} (in mm). In general that will be the case if the acoustic phase shift in the bypass is less than
45 degrees. A second requirement to minimise dissipation is to keep the gas velocity in the bypass low. In practice this means that the total cross-section of the bypass is in the order of 5% or more of the cross-section of the regenerator. In general the first requirement is herewith also amply met. There is in principle no upper limit for the cross-section of the bypass.
The length of the bypass is dependent on the desired pha
De Blok Cornelis Maria
Van Rijt Nicolaas Adrianus Hendrikus Jozef
Capossela Ronald
De Blok Cornelis Maria
Young & Thompson
LandOfFree
Thermo-acoustic system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Thermo-acoustic system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Thermo-acoustic system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2607623