Electricity: conductors and insulators – Anti-inductive structures – Conductor transposition
Reexamination Certificate
2003-09-08
2004-08-24
Ngo, Hung V. (Department: 2831)
Electricity: conductors and insulators
Anti-inductive structures
Conductor transposition
C174S051000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06781053
ABSTRACT:
FIELD
The present invention relates to integrated circuits, and more particularly, the present invention relates to testing integrated circuits.
BACKGROUND
Integrated circuits are designed to operate under a variety of environmental conditions. For example, integrated circuits are designed to operate over a range of temperatures. To ensure that an integrated circuit operates correctly over a particular range of temperatures, the integrated circuit is tested at different temperatures within the particular range of temperatures.
FIG. 1
 shows a prior art test unit 
101
 for producing a constant temperature environment in which an integrated circuit can be tested. The test unit 
101
 includes a constant temperature air source 
103
, a test fixture 
105
, and an enclosure 
107
. A die 
109
, which includes an integrated circuit, is inserted in the test fixture 
105
 for electrical testing. The constant temperature air source 
103
 is capable of providing a stream of constant temperature air to the test fixture 
105
. The enclosure 
107
, when inserted between the test fixture 
105
 and the constant temperature air source 
103
, provides a cavity 
111
 in which a constant temperature environment is created. The enclosure 
107
 is fabricated from stacked foam rubber pads 
113
, 
115
, and 
117
. Each of the foam rubber pads 
113
, 
115
, and 
117
 has a hole such that when the foam rubber pads are stacked, as shown in 
FIG. 1
, the holes are aligned to form the cavity 
111
. Each of the foam rubber pads 
113
, 
115
, and 
117
 also has one surface 
119
, 
121
, and 
123
, respectively, coated with a conductive material. At least one of the surfaces 
119
, 
121
, or 
123
 is attached to a ground 
125
.
TABLE 1
Silicone Foam Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Data
Free Air
Free Air
Ionized Air
Ionized Air
Decay+
Decay−
Decay+
Decay−
Coated ½″ Silicone Sheet
Grounded
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Average
0.1
0.1
0.1
 0.12
Ungrounded
Infinite
Infinite
172.3 
207.9 
*
Infinite
Infinite
178.5 
214.1 
Infinite
Infinite
180.7 
204.5 
Infinite
Infinite
180.1 
198.3 
Infinite
Infinite
177.1 
200.3 
Average
177.74 
205.02 
Model #
Cal Date
Due Date
Ion Systems
210   
Jun. 9, 1999
Jun. 7, 2000
Charge Plate
Notes: 
All tests performed with coated side of foam resting on charged plate. 
All grounding done through 1 Meg. Ohm resistor to ground. 
Decay test was from +/−5000 volts to +/−100 volts. 
All Test Equipment Traceable to NIST. 
*Non-Coated Side of silicone foam was charged to about −3K volts when first placed on charge plate. 
Coated side of silicone foam was about +5 volts when first placed on charge plate ungrounded. 
Table 1 shows electrostatic discharge data for a grounded sheet of silicone foam charged to ±5000 volts in free air and ionized air and an ungrounded sheet of silicone foam charged to ±5000 volts in free air and in ionized air. As can be seen from Table 1, a grounded silicone foam sheet discharges in about 100 milliseconds, and an ungrounded sheet does not discharge in free air and discharges in between about 177 seconds and about 205 seconds in ionized air.
Unfortunately, several problems can occur during the operation of the test unit 
101
 during the testing of the die 
109
. First, an electrostatic charge 
127
 can accumulate on the surfaces 
119
, 
121
, and 
123
 of the enclosure 
107
, and an electrostatic charge 
129
 can accumulate on the test fixture 
105
. The accumulation of electrostatic charge 
127
 on the enclosure 
107
 and the accumulation of electrostatic charge 
129
 on the test fixture 
105
 can cause currents to flow in the test fixture 
105
. The currents flowing in the test fixture 
105
 may damage the die 
109
 and any electronic circuits (not shown) connected to the test fixture 
105
. The problem is particularly severe when any of the surfaces 
119
, 
121
, or 
123
 become ungrounded. As shown in the test data in Table 1, the decay time is between about 177 seconds and about 205 seconds for an ungrounded silicone sheet. This long decay time increases the likelihood of the die 
109
 becoming damaged by electrostatic discharge. Second, since the stacked foam rubber pads 
113
, 
115
, and 
117
 provide an enclosure having poor structural integrity, the location of the pads can change between uses of the test unit 
101
. A change in pad location makes it difficult to get consistent results when performing repeatability tests using the test unit 
101
.
For these and other reasons there is a need for the present invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4326165 (1982-04-01), Szedon
patent: 5045638 (1991-09-01), Wada et al.
patent: 5065089 (1991-11-01), Rich
patent: 5220277 (1993-06-01), Reitinger
patent: 5749178 (1998-05-01), Garmong
patent: 5838568 (1998-11-01), Dickinson et al.
patent: 5949682 (1999-09-01), Dickinson et al.
patent: 6114868 (2000-09-01), Nevill
Brence James K.
Ollila Richard W.
Intel Corporation
Ngo Hung V.
Schwegman Lundberg Woessner & Kluth P.A.
LandOfFree
Test unit and enclosure for testing integrated circuits does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Test unit and enclosure for testing integrated circuits, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Test unit and enclosure for testing integrated circuits will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3340539