Measuring and testing – Specimen stress or strain – or testing by stress or strain... – By loading of specimen
Reexamination Certificate
1997-04-28
2002-06-18
Noori, Max (Department: 2855)
Measuring and testing
Specimen stress or strain, or testing by stress or strain...
By loading of specimen
C073S799000, C073S804000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06405600
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains generally to a material test specimen for conducting stress and strain measurements and more specifically to a test specimen tailored to provide information on multiaxial stress and strain states in a controlled manner under tensile deformation.
2. Description of the Related Art
Identification of the fracture limit surface for multiaxial strain states, as shown in
FIG. 1
, is needed for manufacturing process design, structural design and structural integrity prediction. This is particularly true for strain-path-dependent fracture in metal alloys. Current practice in multiaxial strain state fracture limit diagrams is based on two existing methods for determining material mechanical behavior under multiaxial stress states; “tension-torsion-internal pressure” testing apparatus and the “hydrostatic bulge” testing apparatus. The material specimens are either hollow cylindrical tubes of uniform wall thickness or sheet specimens of uniform thickness, respectively. Both of these specialized test procedures are effective but require specialized test equipment which is generally specifically designed and dedicated to the purpose of multiaxial material characterization and testing. Both procedures have a low “data yield” per specimen, producing one strain history and one fracture datum point per specimen. Both test procedures also strive to preserve homogenous deformation fields for their ease of data reduction that such direct measurement allows. Determining a complete fracture limit diagram for multiple stress states requires many individual tests and is time consuming and expensive.
This invention teaches a new material test specimen geometry, wherein, the geometry features commonly referred to as “stress concentrators” generate stress and strain gradients in the material under test, supplemented by computational simulation of the test specimen.
The computational simulation of material test specimens, as a means of using nonuniform material deformation fields, has been used by K. S. Pister, Constitutive Modeling and Numerical Solution of Field Problems, Nuc. Engng. Design, Vol. 28, pp. 137-146, 1974; Idling et al., Identification of Nonlinear Elastic Solids by a Finite Element Method, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., Vol. 4, pp. 121-142, 1974; Norris et al., A Computer Simulation of the Tension Test, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, Vol. 26, pp. 1-19, 1978; and Matic et al., The Relationship of Tensile Specimen Size and Geometry Effects to Unique Constitutive Parameters for Ductile Materials, Proc. Royal Soc. Lond., Vol. A417, pp. 309-333, 1988; for nonlinear elastic and elastic-plastic constitutive parameter determination.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of this invention is to speed and ease the determination of fracture limits of metallic materials at various stress and strain states.
This and other objectives are accomplished by using a new design for a test specimen. This specimen is tailored to provide information on multiaxial stress and strain states in a controlled manner under tensile deformation by employing any commonly available tension testing apparatus, and stress analysis using appropriate and commonly available analytical methods or computer software. The specimen is also designed to provide information for more than one stress and strain state from a single specimen, if desired.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2617293 (1952-11-01), Schnadt
patent: 4257265 (1981-03-01), Ashbee
patent: 4590804 (1986-05-01), Brull
patent: 4836031 (1989-06-01), Jatho et al.
patent: 5022272 (1991-06-01), Bronowicki et al.
patent: 5425274 (1995-06-01), Creager
patent: 6088472 (2000-07-01), O'Donnell et al.
Baik et al., “Forming Limit Diagram of Perforated Sheet”, Scripta Metallurgica et Material, vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 1201-1207, 1995.
Geltmacher, “A Modelling Study of the Effect of Stress State on Void Linking”, Doctorial Thesis PA. St. Univ., 1994.
Matic et al., “The Relation of Tensile Specimen Size and Geometry Effects to Unique Constructive Parameters for Ductile Materials”, Proc. p. Soc, London, 4417, pp. 309-333, 1988.
Idling et al., “Identification of Nonlinear Elasticf Solids by a Finite Element Method”, Comp. Meth, In Appl. Mech and Engr., vol. 4, pp. 121-142, 1974.
Matic et al., “Material Fracture Characterization Using Novel Specimen Geometriries and Finite Element Analysis”, 1996 Abaqus Users Conf. Proc, Newport, RJ, May 1996.
DeGiorgi Virginia G.
Everett Richard K.
Geltmacher Andrew B.
Matic Peter
Karasek John J.
Mills John G.
Noori Max
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of
LandOfFree
Test specimen design incorporating multiple fracture sites... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Test specimen design incorporating multiple fracture sites..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Test specimen design incorporating multiple fracture sites... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2892841