Telecommunications enabled eyeglass

Details Telecommunications enabled eyeglass Telecommunications enabled eyeglass

2006-05-03

2008-11-18

Dang, Hung X (Department: 2873)

Optics: eye examining, vision testing and correcting

Spectacles and eyeglasses

Combined

C351S041000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07452073

ABSTRACT:
Disclosed is an eyewear retention system, which may include any of a variety of electronics, including telecommunications receivers, transmitters, electronic storage devices, and head-up display driving circuitry.

REFERENCES:
patent: 1026272 (1912-05-01), Leveque
patent: 1370806 (1921-03-01), Gamer
patent: D130310 (1941-11-01), Monjar
patent: 2504524 (1950-04-01), Hayward
patent: 2688900 (1954-09-01), Silverman
patent: 3371979 (1968-03-01), Catanzaro
patent: D228677 (1973-10-01), Wichers
patent: D229974 (1974-01-01), Wichers et al.
patent: 3853393 (1974-12-01), Fila et al.
patent: 4006974 (1977-02-01), Resnick
patent: 4149780 (1979-04-01), Young
patent: 4537612 (1985-08-01), Borrelli et al.
patent: 4550984 (1985-11-01), Reymond
patent: 4636048 (1987-01-01), Jones
patent: 4683587 (1987-07-01), Silverman
patent: D292986 (1987-12-01), Magestro
patent: 4803487 (1989-02-01), Willard et al.
patent: 4806011 (1989-02-01), Bettinger
patent: 4856086 (1989-08-01), McCullough
patent: 4882769 (1989-11-01), Gallimore
patent: 4902120 (1990-02-01), Weyer
patent: 4904078 (1990-02-01), Gorike
patent: 5020150 (1991-05-01), Shannon
patent: D325590 (1992-04-01), Galy
patent: 5137342 (1992-08-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 5249001 (1993-09-01), Jannard
patent: 5327178 (1994-07-01), McManigal
patent: 5335285 (1994-08-01), Gluz
patent: 5353378 (1994-10-01), Hoffman
patent: 5367345 (1994-11-01), Da Silva
patent: 5406340 (1995-04-01), Hoff
patent: 5481763 (1996-01-01), Brostrom et al.
patent: 5563951 (1996-10-01), Wang et al.
patent: 5579400 (1996-11-01), Ballein
patent: 5581492 (1996-12-01), Janik
patent: 5606743 (1997-02-01), Vogt et al.
patent: 5617477 (1997-04-01), Boyden
patent: 5634201 (1997-05-01), Mooring
patent: 5658502 (1997-08-01), Hughes
patent: 5680465 (1997-10-01), Boyden
patent: 5682434 (1997-10-01), Boyden
patent: 5715323 (1998-02-01), Walker
patent: 5717479 (1998-02-01), Rickards
patent: 5721783 (1998-02-01), Anderson
patent: D392990 (1998-03-01), Hall et al.
patent: 5760868 (1998-06-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 5805261 (1998-09-01), Houston et al.
patent: 5835185 (1998-11-01), Kallman et al.
patent: 5886822 (1999-03-01), Spitzer
patent: 5892564 (1999-04-01), Rahn
patent: 5953434 (1999-09-01), Boyden
patent: 6010216 (2000-01-01), Jesiek
patent: 6012812 (2000-01-01), Rickards
patent: 6023372 (2000-02-01), Spitzer et al.
patent: 6091546 (2000-07-01), Spitzer
patent: 6091832 (2000-07-01), Shurman et al.
patent: 6106116 (2000-08-01), Houston et al.
patent: 6108197 (2000-08-01), Janik
patent: 6157533 (2000-12-01), Sallam et al.
patent: 6181956 (2001-01-01), Koskan
patent: 6204974 (2001-03-01), Spitzer
patent: 6211799 (2001-04-01), Post et al.
patent: 6212414 (2001-04-01), Alameh et al.
patent: 6218958 (2001-04-01), Eichstaedt et al.
patent: 6230327 (2001-05-01), Briand et al.
patent: 6231181 (2001-05-01), Swab
patent: 6239778 (2001-05-01), Palffy-Muhoray et al.
patent: 6272359 (2001-08-01), Kivela et al.
patent: 6280838 (2001-08-01), Bernards et al.
patent: 6285757 (2001-09-01), Carroll et al.
patent: 6301050 (2001-10-01), DeLeon
patent: 6301367 (2001-10-01), Boyden et al.
patent: 6301593 (2001-10-01), Toyosato
patent: 6311155 (2001-10-01), Vaudrey et al.
patent: 6312811 (2001-11-01), Frigoli et al.
patent: 6314091 (2001-11-01), LaRowe, Jr. et al.
patent: 6325507 (2001-12-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 6347095 (2002-02-01), Tang et al.
patent: 6349001 (2002-02-01), Spitzer
patent: 6350129 (2002-02-01), Gorlick
patent: 6351468 (2002-02-01), LaRowe, Jr. et al.
patent: 6353503 (2002-03-01), Spitzer et al.
patent: 6356392 (2002-03-01), Spitzer
patent: 6384982 (2002-05-01), Spitzer
patent: 6392798 (2002-05-01), Newkirk
patent: 6421031 (2002-07-01), Ronzani et al.
patent: 6424820 (2002-07-01), Burdick et al.
patent: 6560449 (2003-05-01), Liu
patent: 6582075 (2003-06-01), Swab et al.
patent: 6618099 (2003-09-01), Spitzer
patent: 6650894 (2003-11-01), Berstis et al.
patent: 6724354 (2004-04-01), Spitzer et al.
patent: 6729726 (2004-05-01), Miller et al.
patent: 6769767 (2004-08-01), Swab et al.
patent: 6929365 (2005-08-01), Swab et al.
patent: 6966647 (2005-11-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 6975667 (2005-12-01), Mattisson et al.
patent: 7004582 (2006-02-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 7013009 (2006-03-01), Warren
patent: 7158096 (2007-01-01), Spitzer
patent: 7213917 (2007-05-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 7219994 (2007-05-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 7231038 (2007-06-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2002/0098877 (2002-07-01), Glezerman
patent: 2002/0176330 (2002-11-01), Ramonowski et al.
patent: 2003/0022690 (2003-01-01), Beyda et al.
patent: 2003/0068057 (2003-04-01), Miller et al.
patent: 2003/0073460 (2003-04-01), Van Pelt et al.
patent: 2004/0000733 (2004-01-01), Swab et al.
patent: 2004/0156012 (2004-08-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2004/0157649 (2004-08-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2004/0160572 (2004-08-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2004/0160573 (2004-08-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2005/0046789 (2005-03-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2005/0046790 (2005-03-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2005/0128431 (2005-06-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2005/0185815 (2005-08-01), Rickards
patent: 2005/0201585 (2005-09-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2006/0132382 (2006-06-01), Jannard
patent: 2006/0197907 (2006-09-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2006/0203184 (2006-09-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 2007/0008484 (2007-01-01), Jannard
patent: 2007/0037520 (2007-02-01), Warren
patent: 2008/0089545 (2008-04-01), Jannard et al.
patent: 0840465 (1998-06-01), None
patent: 00235504 (2000-04-01), None
patent: WO 99/050706 (1999-10-01), None
patent: WO 01/06298 (2001-01-01), None
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement; U.S. District Court—Central District of California; Case No.: SACV 05-1099 AHS (MLGx);Oakley, Inc. v.BMW of North America, LLC., Filed: Nov. 28, 2005; this lawsuit has been settled and dismissed.
First Ameded Complaint for Patent Infringement; U.S. District—Central District of California; Case No.: SACV06-244 AHS (MLGx);Oakley, Inc. v.Overstock.com, Inc., Woot.com, Inc. dba Synapse Micro, Inc., Global American Technologies, LLC., AIGO, Corp., Filed: Mar. 27, 2006; this lawsuit has been settled in part.
First Amended Complaint and Application for Permanent Injunction; U.S. District—Eastern District of Texas (Texarkana Division); Civil Action No. 506 CV 124;QR SPEX, Inc. v.Motorola, Inc.; Oakley, Inc.; Oakley Sales Corp.; Oakley Direct Inc.; Zeal Optics, Inc; XONIX Electronic Co., Ltd; and Kyocera Wireless Corp., Filed: Jul. 27, 2006; this lawsuit is currently pending.
Complaint for Patent Infringement; U.S. District—Central District of California; Case No.: SACV 06-899 JVS(MLGx);Oakley, Inc. v.XONIX Electronics Co., Ltd., Filed: Sep. 26, 2006; this lawsuit is currently pending.
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement; U.S. District Court - Central District of California, Southern Division; Case No.: SACV 07-558 AG (RNBx);Oakley, Inc.v.Practical Enterprises, Inc., Filed: Jun. 08, 2007; this lawsuit resulted in a default judgement.
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement; U.S. District Court - Central District of California, Southern Division; Case No.: SACV 07-671 AG (RBNx);Oakley, Inc.v.XONIX (Zhuhai) Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., Filed: Jun. 07, 2007; this lawsuit is pending.
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement; U.S. District Court - Central District of California, Southern Division; Case No.: SACV 07-57 DOC (ANx);Oakley, Inc.v.Blue Diamond International, Filed: Jan. 16, 2007; this lawsuit resulted in a default judgment.
First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement; U.S. District Court - Central District of California, Southern Division; Case No.: SACV 07-888 CJC (RCx);Oakley, Inc.v.The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California, Inc. et al., Filed: Aug. 01, 2007; this lawsuit is still pending.
Stipulation to Amend Pleadings in Consolidated Cases Transferred from Eastern District of Texas; U.S. District Court - Central District of California, Southern Division; Case No. 07-CV-00987 CJC (RNBx);QR Spex, Inc.v.Motorola, Inc. et al.; Filed Sep. 05, 2007; this lawsuit was transferred to

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Telecommunications enabled eyeglass does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Telecommunications enabled eyeglass, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Telecommunications enabled eyeglass will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4041331