Technique for deploying expandables

Wells – Processes – Assembling well part

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C166S055800, C166S207000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07036600

ABSTRACT:
A technique for deploying expandables is provided. The technique comprises actuating an expansion tool such that the expansion tool imparts an outwardly directed radial force on an expandable tubular. More specifically, the expansion tool imparts radial expansion forces against an interior surface of the tubular thereby allowing the tubular to be deployed in a wellbore environment.

REFERENCES:
patent: 1945079 (1934-01-01), Riemenschneider
patent: 1981525 (1934-11-01), Price
patent: 3358492 (1967-12-01), Richter
patent: 4065953 (1978-01-01), Frentzen et al.
patent: 4309891 (1982-01-01), Pogonowski
patent: 5785120 (1998-07-01), Smalley et al.
patent: 5833001 (1998-11-01), Song et al.
patent: 6425444 (2002-07-01), Metcalfe et al.
patent: 6457532 (2002-10-01), Simpson
patent: 6478091 (2002-11-01), Gano
patent: 6478092 (2002-11-01), Voll et al.
patent: 6598678 (2003-07-01), Simpson et al.
patent: 6622797 (2003-09-01), Sivley, IV
patent: 6688395 (2004-02-01), Maguire et al.
patent: 6722441 (2004-04-01), Lauritzen et al.
patent: 6805196 (2004-10-01), Lawrence
patent: 2001/0002626 (2001-06-01), Frank et al.
patent: 2001/0045284 (2001-11-01), Simpson et al.
patent: 2002/0046840 (2002-04-01), Schetky et al.
patent: 2371064 (2002-07-01), None
patent: 1745873 (1992-07-01), None
patent: WO 00/37766 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 00/37766 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 00/37767 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 00/37768 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 00/37773 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 02/38343 (2002-05-01), None
patent: WO 03/010414 (2003-02-01), None
patent: WO 03/078785 (2003-09-01), None
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.) (PACER Jun. 2, 2005) (5 pages).
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) (PACER Aug. 11, 2005) (13 pages).
Communication from United States District Court Transferring Case,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.), dated Sep. 7, 2004 (1 page).
Plaintiffs' Original Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed May 14, 2004 (20 pages).
Defendants' Motions (1) to Dismiss the Complaint for Insufficiency of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, (2) to Dismiss Counts I-III of the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, and (3) in the Alternative, to Transfer This Action to the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed Jul. 7, 2004 (49 pages).
Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 19, 2004 (20 pages).
Answer of Defendants and Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) filed Nov. 2, 2004 (20 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Answer to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Dec. 3, 2004 (10 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
First Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 9, 2005 (16 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (29 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil to Motions of Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (29 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (9 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (4 pages).
Reply of Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Kentucky Oil Technology's Opposition to First Amended, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (17 pages).
Schlumberger's Response to Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Schlumberger's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 2, and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to STC's Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 3 and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (4 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Kentucky Oil's Motion to Strike Declaration

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Technique for deploying expandables does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Technique for deploying expandables, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Technique for deploying expandables will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3580778

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.