Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling...

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S007380

Reexamination Certificate

active

07627494

ABSTRACT:
A systems, methods and computer program products are provided for modeling a monetary measure of a good, such as a cost or revenue associated with the good. A method begins by selecting at least one qualitative measure of maturity for at least one technology associated with the good, where each qualitative measure of maturity is associated with a distribution such that each technology is correspondingly associated with a distribution. Next, a monetary point is associated with each technology, and thereafter a monetary distribution is determined for each technology based upon a respective monetary point and a respective distribution. A plurality of monetary values are selected by randomly selecting the plurality of monetary values for each technology based upon a respective monetary distribution. Finally, the monetary measure for the good are modeled based upon the selected monetary values for each technology.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5377095 (1994-12-01), Maeda et al.
patent: 5692233 (1997-11-01), Garman
patent: 5710578 (1998-01-01), Beauregard et al.
patent: 5960407 (1999-09-01), Vivona
patent: 6061662 (2000-05-01), Makivic
patent: 6078893 (2000-06-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6078901 (2000-06-01), Ching
patent: 6157918 (2000-12-01), Shepherd
patent: 6205431 (2001-03-01), Willemain et al.
patent: 6321205 (2001-11-01), Eder
patent: 6321212 (2001-11-01), Lange
patent: 6381586 (2002-04-01), Glasserman et al.
patent: 6393406 (2002-05-01), Eder
patent: 6629082 (2003-09-01), Hambrecht et al.
patent: 6810332 (2004-10-01), Harrison
patent: 6853952 (2005-02-01), Chadwick
patent: 6862579 (2005-03-01), Mathews et al.
patent: 6910017 (2005-06-01), Woo et al.
patent: 6963854 (2005-11-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 7085734 (2006-08-01), Grant et al.
patent: 7110956 (2006-09-01), Drake et al.
patent: 7133848 (2006-11-01), Phillips et al.
patent: 7197474 (2007-03-01), Kitts
patent: 7315842 (2008-01-01), Wang
patent: 7349878 (2008-03-01), Makivic
patent: 7398221 (2008-07-01), Bensoussan et al.
patent: 2001/0041996 (2001-11-01), Eder
patent: 2002/0010667 (2002-01-01), Kant et al.
patent: 2002/0116348 (2002-08-01), Phillips et al.
patent: 2002/0143604 (2002-10-01), Cox et al.
patent: 2003/0014337 (2003-01-01), Mathews et al.
patent: 2003/0033191 (2003-02-01), Davies et al.
patent: 2003/0078870 (2003-04-01), Datar et al.
patent: 2003/0115128 (2003-06-01), Lange et al.
patent: 2003/0144897 (2003-07-01), Burruss et al.
patent: 2004/0068455 (2004-04-01), Jacobus et al.
patent: 2004/0098327 (2004-05-01), Seaman
patent: 2004/0128221 (2004-07-01), Pandher
patent: 2007/0022031 (2007-01-01), Sponholtz et al.
patent: 2007/0050282 (2007-03-01), Chen et al.
patent: 2008/0208678 (2008-08-01), Walser et al.
patent: 1 178 416 (2002-02-01), None
patent: 2001357189 (2001-12-01), None
Largent, Matthew C. “A probabilistic risk management based process for planning and management of technology development” PhD Dissertation Georgia Tech Aerospace Engineering, Mar. 2003, downloaded 9/3/208 [retrieved from http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/12168], pp. 1-79, 210-271.
Eric L. Burgess, Hany S. Gobrieal;Integrating Spacecraft Design and Cost-Risk Analysis Using NASA Technology Readiness Levels;Feb. 1996; 29th Annual DoD Cost Analysis Symposium, Leesburg, Virginia; 14 pages; The Aerospace Corporation; Herndon, Virginia.
Ray Nelson; Risk Analysis Using @RISK® and Crystal Ball® ;Oracle of IIE;Dec. 2000; pp. 8-11.
John M. Charnes; Using Simulation for Option Pricing; Dec. 2000; pp. 151-157;Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference,Orlando, Florida.
Risk Analysis Overview—What is Risk?; Available at <http://www.decisioneering.com/risk-analysis-print.html> (visited Feb. 19, 2002).
Real Options with Monte Carlo Simulation;Available at <http://www.puc-rio.br/marco.ind/monte-carlo.html> (visited Feb. 25, 2002).
Cone of Uncertainty;Available at <http://www.real-options.com/cou.html> (visited Oct. 11, 2002).
Weston Copeland;Managerial Finance;1990; pp. 481-487, 406-407, 642 (10 pages); 9thEdition; ISBN 0 03 0558832.
Alan Shapiro;Modern Corporate Finance;1990; pp. 438, 261; ISBN 002409530-3.
Felstead, “A Mathematical Approach to Cost Minimization of Satcom Systems”, 1996, IEEE, pp. 352-356.
Morrison, “Life Cycle Approach to New Product Forecasting”, Summer 1995,The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods&Systems,14, 2, ABI/INFORM, Global, p. 3.
Eskin, “Dynamic Forecast of New Product Demand Using a Depth of Repeat Model”, May 1973,JMR Journal of Marketing Research,10, 0000002, AB/INFORM Global, p. 115.
Bassin, “The Logistic Curve—another approach to new product forecasting”, Fall 1991,The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods&Systems,10, 3, ABI/INFORM Global, p. 14.
Paszko et al., “Product Life Cycles and Profitability”Summer 1989,The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods&Systems,8, 2; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 26.
Nelson, “The Product Life Cycle of Engineered Metals: a comparative analysis of the application of product life cycle theory”, Spring 1992,The Journal of Business&Industrial Marketing,7, 2, ABI/INFORM Global, p. 5.
Curry, “FALCCM-H: Functional Avionics Life Cycle Cost Model for Hardware”, © 1993, IEEE, pp. 950-953.
Xie et al., “Probabilistic Design Optimization of Aircraft Structures with Reliability, Manufacturability, and Cost Constraints”, Apr. 7-10, 2003, 44thAIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, p. 1.
Marx et al., “Knowledge-based manufacturing and structural design for a high speed civil transport”, 1994, 1stIndustry / Academy Symposium on Research for Future Supersonic and Hypersonic Vehicles, Greensboro, NC pp. 1-6.
Schrage, “Technology for Rotorcraft Affordability Through Integrated Product/Process Development (IPPD)”, 1999, American Helicopter Society 55thAnnual Forum, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1-19.
Kamath et al., T.P.M. (2002) A Bayesian approach to a dynamic inventory model under an unknown demand distribution. Computers & Operations Research, v. 29, pp. 403-422.
Hirschleifer (1980) Price Theory and Applications. Prentice-Hall: New York, pp. 126-151.
Morris (1992) Market Oriented Pricing. Quarom Books: New York, pp. 172-173.
Evans and Berman (1992). Marketing. Macmillan: New York. Chapter 18: Overview of Price Planning, pp. 526-547.
Berry et al., Automobile Prices in Market Equilibria. Econometrica, vol. 63, No. 4 (Jul. 1995), pp. 841-890.
Monroe, (1978) Models for Pricing Decisions,Journal of Marketing Research,vol. XV (August), pp. 413-428.
Urban et al., (1968) A New Product Analysis and Decision Model,Management Science,vol. 14, No. 8 (April), pp. B490-B519.
Yang et al. (2003) Bayesian Analysis of Simultaneous Demand and Supply, Quantitative Marketing and Economics, vol. 1, pp. 251-275.
Breeden et al., “Prices of State Contingent Claims Implicit in Options Prices”,Journal of Business,vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 621-651 (Oct. 1978).
Cortazar et al., “Monte Carlo Evaluation Model of an Undeveloped Oil Field”,Journal of Energy Finance&Development,vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 73-84. Available online Jan. 13, 1998. ISSN: 1085-743.
Charnes, John M., “Using Simulation for Option Pricing”, The University of Kansas School of Business, Dec. 13, 2000, Presented at 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 10-13, 2000, Wyndham Palace Resort and Spa, Orlando, FL, www.wintersim.org, pp. 151-157.
MacMillan, Fional, “Risk, Uncertainty and Investment Decision-Making in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry”, MA Hons (University of Aberdeen), Oct. 2000, A thesis presented for the degree of Ph.D. at the University of Aberdeen.
Longstaff, et al., “Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach”, Anderson Graduate School of Management, eScholarship Repository, University of California, httn://repositories.cdlib.org/anderson/fin/1-01, 2001.
International Search Report

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems, methods and computer program products for modeling... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4125832

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.