Systems, methods and apparatus for local programming of...

Coded data generation or conversion – Analog to or from digital conversion – With particular solid state devices

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C385S123000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07876248

ABSTRACT:
Systems, methods and apparatus for a scalable quantum processor architecture. A quantum processor is locally programmable by providing a memory register with a signal embodying device control parameter(s), converting the signal to an analog signal; and administering the analog signal to one or more programmable devices.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4496854 (1985-01-01), Chi et al.
patent: 4937525 (1990-06-01), Daalmans
patent: 5128675 (1992-07-01), Harada
patent: 5162731 (1992-11-01), Fujimaki
patent: 5629889 (1997-05-01), Chandra et al.
patent: 5812078 (1998-09-01), Przybysz et al.
patent: 6627916 (2003-09-01), Amin et al.
patent: 6838694 (2005-01-01), Esteve et al.
patent: 6978070 (2005-12-01), McCarthy et al.
patent: 7133888 (2006-11-01), Kohn et al.
patent: 7335909 (2008-02-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2003/0071258 (2003-04-01), Zagoskin et al.
patent: 2003/0224753 (2003-12-01), Bremond et al.
patent: 2005/0082519 (2005-04-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2005/0250651 (2005-11-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2005/0256007 (2005-11-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2006/0147154 (2006-07-01), Thom et al.
patent: 2006/0225165 (2006-10-01), Maassen van den Brink et al.
patent: 2386426 (2000-10-01), None
U.S. Appl. No. 60/917,884, filed May 14, 2007, Berkley et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/975,083, filed Sep. 25, 2007, Amin.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/975,487, filed Sep. 26, 2007, Maibaum et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/986,554, filed Nov. 8, 2007, Choi.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/013,192, filed Jan. 11, 2008, Rose et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,995, filed Jan. 22, 2008, Harris.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/120,354, filed May 14, 2008, Bunyk et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/039,710, filed Mar. 25, 2008, Maibaum et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/109,847, filed Apr. 25, 2008, Berkley.
“A High-Level Look at Optimization: Past, Present and Future,” e-Optimization.Community, May 2000, pp. 1-5.
Allen et al., “Blue Gene: A vision for protein science using a petaflop supercomputer,”IBM Systems Journal40(2): 310-327, 2001.
Amin et al., “Thermally assisted adiabatic quantum computation,” arXiv:cond-mat/0609332v2, pp. 1-5, Mar. 2, 2007.
Averin et al., “Variable Electrostatic Transformer: Controllable Coupling of Two Charge Qubits,”Physical Review Letters91(5): 057003-1-057003-4, Aug. 1, 2003.
Blatter et al,, “Design aspects of superconducting-phase quantum bits,”Physical Review B63: 174511-1-174511-9, 2001.
Bocko et al., “Prospects for Quantum Coherent Computation Using Superconducting Electronics,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity7(2): 3638-3641, Jun. 1997.
Brennen et al., “Why should anyone care about computing with anyons?,” arXiv:0704.2241v1[quant-ph], pp. 1-12, Apr. 18, 2007.
Butcher, “Advances in persistent-current qubit research: Inductively coupled qubits and novel biasing methods,” Final Report, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, pp. 1-50, Jan. 10, 2002.
Choudhury,Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining and Microfabrication vol. 1: Microlithography, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, 1999.
Clarke et al., “Quiet Readout of Superconducting Flux States,”Physica Scripta. T102: 173-177, 2002.
Cosmelli et al., “Controllable Flux Coupling for the Integration of Flux Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0403690v1, pp. 1-10, Mar. 29, 2004.
Deutsch, “Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer,” Appeared inProceedings of the Royal Society of London A400: 97-117, 1985.
Dolan et al., “Optimization on the NEOS Server,” fromSIAM News35(6): Jul./Aug. 1-5, 2002.
Farhi et al., “Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithms versus Simulated Annealing,” MIT-CTP #3228, arXiv:quant-ph/0201031 v1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 8, 2002.
Feynman, “Simulating Physics with Computers,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics21(6/7): 467-488, 1982.
Filippov et al., “Tunable Transformer for Qubits Based on Flux States,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity13(2): Jun. 1-4, 2003.
Fourer et al., “Optimization as an Internet Resource,”INTERFACES31(2): 130-150, Mar.-Apr. 2001.
Friedman et al., “Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states,”Nature406: 43-46, Jul. 6, 2000.
Fritzsch et al., SNS and SIS Josephson junctions with dimensions down to the sub-μm region prepared by an unified technology,Supercond. Sci. Tech.12: 880-882, 1999.
Ghiu et al., “Asymmetric two-output quantum processor in any dimension,” arXiv:quant-ph/0610138v1, pp. 1-8, Oct. 17, 2006.
Harris et al., “Sign and Magnitude Tunable Coupler for Superconducting Flux Qubits,”DWAVE/COUPLER-10, arXiv:cond-mat/0608253 v1, Aug. 11, 2006.
Hillery et al., “Approximate programmable quantum processors,” arXiv:quant-ph/0510161v1, pp. 1-7, Oct. 20, 2005.
Hioe and Goto,Quantum Flux Parametron—A Single Quantum Flux Superconducting Logic Device, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, pp. 23-43, 1991.
Il'ichev et al., “Continuous Monitoring of Rabi Oscillations in a Josephson Flux Qubit,”Physical Review Letters91(9): 097906-1-097906-4, week ending Aug. 29, 2003.
Kaiser et al., “Coherent Atomic Matter Waves: Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School, Session LXXII in 1999,” Springer-Verlag, New York, ISBN 286883499X, pp. 184-188, 294-295, 302-303.
Koch et al., “Model for 1/f Flux Noise in SQUIDs and Qubits,” pp. 1-14, May 5, 2007.
Levinson,Principles of Lithography, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, 2001.
Levitov et al., “Quantum spin chains and Majorana states in arrays of coupled qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0108266v2, pp. 1-7, Aug. 19, 2001.
Maassen van den Brink et al., “Mediated tunable coupling of flux qubits,”New Journal of Physics7: 1-18, 2005.
Madou,Fundamentals of Microfabrication, Second Edition, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2002.
Makhlin et al., “Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices,”Reviews of Modern Physics73(2): 357-400, Apr. 2001.
Mc Hugh et al., “A quantum computer using a trapped-ion spin molecule and microwave radiation,” arXiv:quant-ph/0310015v2, pp. 1-9, Apr. 13, 2004.
Mooij et al., “Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit,”Science285: 1036-1039, Aug. 13, 1999.
Nielsen, “Cluster-State Quantum Computation,” arXiv:quant-ph/0504097v2, pp. 1-15, Jul. 1, 2005.
Nielsen et al.,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, Chapter 7, “Quantum computers: physical realization,” pp. 277-352.
Nielsen et al.,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, “7.8 Other implementation schemes,” pp. 343-345.
Orlando et al., “Superconducting persistent-current qubit,”Physical Review B60(22): 15 398-15 413, Dec. 1, 1999.
Plourde et al., “Entangling flux qubits with a bipolar dynamic inductance,”Physical Review B70(140501-R): 1-4, 2004.
Ryan et al., “Characterization of complex quantum dynamics with a scalable NMR information processor,” arXiv:quant-ph/0506085v2, pp. 1-4, Feb. 13, 2006.
Shirts et al., “Computing: Screen Savers of the Word Unite!,”Science Online290(5498): 1903-1904, Dec. 8, 2000.
Shnirman et al., “Quantum Manipulations of Small Josephson Junctions,”Physical Review Letters79(12): 2371-2374, Sep. 22, 1997.
Shoji et al., “New fabrication process for Josephson tunnel junctions with (niobium nitride, niobium) double-layered electrodes,”Appl. Phys. Lett.41(11): 1097-1099, Dec. 1, 1982.
Shor, “Introduction to Quantum Algorithms,” AT&T Labs—Research, arXiv:quant-ph/0005003 v2, pp. 1-17, Jul. 6, 2001.
Thaker et al., “Quantum Memory Hierarchies: Efficient Designs to Match Available Parallelism in Quantum Computing,” arXiv:quant-ph/0604070v1, 12 pages,

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems, methods and apparatus for local programming of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems, methods and apparatus for local programming of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems, methods and apparatus for local programming of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2690104

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.