Systems, devices, and methods for controllably coupling qubits

Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices – circuits – and – Specific identifiable device – circuit – or system – Superconductive device

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07880529

ABSTRACT:
A coupling system may include first and second magnetic flux inductors communicatively coupled to a Josephson junction of an rf SQUID. The coupling system may allow transverse coupling between qubits. A superconducting processor may include at least one of the coupling systems and two or more qubits. A method may include providing first, second and third coupling structure to control the coupling system.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4051393 (1977-09-01), Fulton
patent: 4496854 (1985-01-01), Chi et al.
patent: 4937525 (1990-06-01), Daalmans
patent: 5128675 (1992-07-01), Harada
patent: 6605822 (2003-08-01), Blais et al.
patent: 6627916 (2003-09-01), Amin et al.
patent: 6753546 (2004-06-01), Tzalenchuk et al.
patent: 6838694 (2005-01-01), Esteve et al.
patent: 6984846 (2006-01-01), Newns et al.
patent: 7051393 (2006-05-01), Cox
patent: 7133888 (2006-11-01), Kohn et al.
patent: 7335909 (2008-02-01), Amin et al.
patent: 7605600 (2009-10-01), Harris
patent: 7619437 (2009-11-01), Thom et al.
patent: 7639035 (2009-12-01), Berkley
patent: 2003/0038285 (2003-02-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2003/0071258 (2003-04-01), Zagoskin et al.
patent: 2003/0224753 (2003-12-01), Bremond et al.
patent: 2004/0016918 (2004-01-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2005/0001209 (2005-01-01), Hilton et al.
patent: 2005/0082519 (2005-04-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2005/0250651 (2005-11-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2005/0256007 (2005-11-01), Amin et al.
patent: 2006/0097747 (2006-05-01), Amin
patent: 2006/0147154 (2006-07-01), Thom et al.
patent: 2006/0225165 (2006-10-01), Maassen van den Brink et al.
patent: 2007/0180586 (2007-08-01), Amin
patent: 2008/0238531 (2008-10-01), Harris
patent: 2008/0258753 (2008-10-01), Harris
patent: 2008/0274898 (2008-11-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 2009/0192041 (2009-07-01), Johansson et al.
patent: 2386426 (2001-05-01), None
patent: 2004/102470 (2004-11-01), None
patent: 2005/093649 (2005-10-01), None
patent: 2006/024939 (2006-03-01), None
“A High-Level Look at Optimization: Past, Present and Future,” e-Optimization.Community, May 2000, pp. 1-5.
Allen et al., “Blue Gene: A Vision for Protein Science Using a Petaflop Supercomputer,”IBM Systems Journal40(2):310-327, 2001.
Amin et al., “Decoherence in Adiabatic Quantum Computation,” arXiv:0708.0384v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall], pp. 1-4, Aug. 2, 2007.
Amin M.H., “Systems, Devices and Methods for Controllably Coupling Qubits,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/975,083, filed Sep. 25, 2007.
Averin et al., “Variable Electrostatic Transformer: Controllable Coupling of Two Charge Qubits,”Physical Review Letters 91(5):057003-1-057003-4, Aug. 1, 2003.
Berkley et al., “Scalable Superconducting Flux Digital-to-Analog Conversion Using a Superconducting Inductor Ladder Circuit,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/917,884, filed May 14, 2007.
Berkley et al., “Systems, Methods and Apparatus for Local Programming of Quantum Processor Elements,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,276, filed Dec. 4, 2007.
Berkley, A.J., “Architecture for Local Programming of Quantum Processor Elements Using Latching Qubits,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/109,847, filed Apr. 25, 2008.
Biamonte et al., “Physical Implementations for a Universal Quantum Computer and Related Coupling Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/910,445, filed Apr. 5, 2007.
Biamonte et al., “Realizable Hamiltonians for Universal Adiabatic Quantum Computers,” arXiv:0704.1287v1 [quant-ph], pp. 1-4, Apr. 10, 2007.
Biamonte et al., “Physical Realizations of a Universal Adiabatic Quantum Computer,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/098,348, filed Apr. 4, 2008.
Blatter et al., “Design aspects of superconducting-phase quantum bits,”Physical Review B63:174511-1-174511-9, 2001.
Bocko et al., “Prospects for Quantum Coherent Computation Using Superconducting Electronics,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity7(2):3638-3641, 1997.
Brennen et al., “Why Should Anyone Care About Computing with Anyons?,” arXiv:0704.2241v1, pp. 1-19, Apr. 18, 2007.
Bunyk et al., “Systems, Methods and Apparatus for Digital-to-Analog Conversion of Superconducting Magentic Flux Signals,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/120,354, filed May 14, 2008.
Butcher, “Advances in Persistent-Current Qubit Research: Inductively Coupled Qubits and Novel Biasing Methods,” Graduate Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 52 pages, Jan. 10, 2002.
Choi, V., “Systems, Devices, and Methods for Analog Processing,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/986,554, filed Nov. 8, 2007.
Choudhury,Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining and Microfabricationvol. 1:Microlithography, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, 1999.
Clarke et al., “Quiet Readout of Superconducting Flux States,”Physica Scripta. T102:173-177, 2002.
Cosmelli et al., “Controllable Flux Coupling for the Integration of Flux Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0403690v1, pp. 1-10, Mar. 29, 2004.
Deutsch, “Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer,” Appeared inProceedings of the Royal Society of London A 400: 97-117, 1985.
Dolan et al., “Optimization on the NEOS Server,” fromSIAM News 35(6): 1-5, Jul./Aug. 2002.
Farhi et al., “Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithms versus Simulated Annealing,” MIT-CTP #3228, arXiv:quant-ph/0201031 v1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 8, 2002.
Feynman, “Simulating Physics with Computers,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics21(6/7):467-488, 1982.
Filippov et al., “Tunable Transformer for Qubits Based on Flux States,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 13(2): 1-4, Jun. 2003.
Fourer et al., “Optimization as an Internet Resource,”Interfaces 31(2):130-150, Mar./Apr. 2001.
Friedman et al., “Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states,”Nature 406:43-46, Jul. 6, 2000.
Fritzsch et al., SNS and SIS Josephson junctions with dimensions down to the sub-μm region prepared by an unified technology,Supercond. Sci. Tech. 12: 880-882, 1999.
Ghiu et al., “Asymmetric two-output quantum processor in any dimension,” arXiv:quant-ph/0610138v1, pp. 1-8, Oct. 17, 2006.
Harris et al., “Sign and Magnitude Tunable Coupler for Superconducting Flux Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0608253 v1, Aug. 11, 2006.
Harris, “Systems, Devices, and Methods for Controllably Coupling Qubits,” Office Action mailed Sep. 3, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,995, 11 pages.
Harris, “Systems, Devices, and Methods for Controllably Coupling Qubits,” Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 18, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,995, 7 pages.
Harris, R.G., “Systems, Devices, and Methods for Controllably Coupling Qubits,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,995, filed Jan. 22, 2008.
Hillery et al., “Approximate programmable quantum processors,” arXiv:quant-ph/0510161v1, pp. 1-7, Oct. 20, 2005.
Hioe,Quantum Flux Parametron—A Single Quantum Flux Superconducting Logic Device, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, pp. 23-43, 1991.
Il'ichev et al., “Continuous Monitoring of Rabi Oscillations in a Josephson Flux Qubit,”Physical Review Letters 91(9):097906-1-097906-4, week ending Aug. 29, 2003.
Inokuchi et al., “Analog Computation using Quantum-Flux Parametron Devices,”Physica C, 357-360, pp. 1618-1621, Department of Electrical Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita 13, Nishi 8, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan, Jan. 12, 2001.
International Search Report, mailed Jan. 21, 2009, for PCT/CA2008/001778, 3 pages.
International Search Report, mailed Jul. 18, 2008, for PCT/CA2008/000841, 4 pages.
International Search Report, mailed Jul. 25, 2008, for PCT/CA2008/000660, 4 pages.
International Search Report, mailed May 20, 2008, for PCT/CA2008/000138, 3 pages.
Ioffe et al., “Environmentally Decoupled sds-wave Josephson Junctions for Quantum Computing,”Nature398:679-681, 1999.
Johnson et al., “Systems, Devices, and Methods for Control

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems, devices, and methods for controllably coupling qubits does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems, devices, and methods for controllably coupling qubits, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems, devices, and methods for controllably coupling qubits will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2631569

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.