Systems and methods for providing neural stimulation with an...

Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical therapeutic systems

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C607S005000, C607S055000, C600S372000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08000797

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides methods and systems for selecting one or more channels of a neural implant to stimulate. A channel selection unit is configured to asynchronously and stochastically select the winning channel or channels based, in part, on the richness of the input sensory environment. Thereafter, the channel selection unit reduces the likelihood that the selected channel or channels will be selected again for a period of time.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4284856 (1981-08-01), Hochmair et al.
patent: 4819647 (1989-04-01), Byers et al.
patent: 5597380 (1997-01-01), McDermott et al.
patent: 5603726 (1997-02-01), Schulman et al.
patent: 5776172 (1998-07-01), Schulman et al.
patent: 5876443 (1999-03-01), Hochmair et al.
patent: 5999859 (1999-12-01), Jolly
patent: 6078838 (2000-06-01), Rubinstein
patent: 6091994 (2000-07-01), Loos
patent: 6129753 (2000-10-01), Kuzma
patent: 6132384 (2000-10-01), Christopherson et al.
patent: 6181969 (2001-01-01), Gord
patent: 6219580 (2001-04-01), Faltys et al.
patent: 6242988 (2001-06-01), Sarpeshkar
patent: 6272382 (2001-08-01), Faltys et al.
patent: 6289247 (2001-09-01), Faltys et al.
patent: 6308101 (2001-10-01), Faltys et al.
patent: 6321125 (2001-11-01), Kuzma
patent: 6390971 (2002-05-01), Adams et al.
patent: 6572531 (2003-06-01), Zilberman et al.
patent: 6604283 (2003-08-01), Kuzma
patent: 6631295 (2003-10-01), Rubinstein et al.
patent: 6732073 (2004-05-01), Kluender et al.
patent: 6751505 (2004-06-01), Van Den Honert
patent: 6778858 (2004-08-01), Peeters
patent: 6788975 (2004-09-01), Whitehurst et al.
patent: 6819957 (2004-11-01), Le
patent: 6845271 (2005-01-01), Fang et al.
patent: 6915166 (2005-07-01), Stecker et al.
patent: 7292892 (2007-11-01), Litvak et al.
patent: 2005/0192646 (2005-09-01), Grayden et al.
Cauwenberghs et al., “A charge-based CMOS parallel analog vector quantizer”, Adv. Neural Inform. Proc. Syst (NIPS), Denver, CO. vol. 7, 1994.
Chen et al., “Frequency modulation detection in cochlear implant subjects,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, pp. 2269-2277, 2004.
Dayan et al., “Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems”, Theoretical Neuroscience, The MIT Press, pp. 162-165, 2001.
Dorman et al., “A comparison of the speech understanding provided by acoustic models of fixed-channel and channel-picking signal processors for Cochlear implants,”Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 45, pp. 783-788, 2002.
Fu et al., “Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 104, pp. 3586-3596, 1998.
Gulya, “Transcription of Open Session, Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Panel,”Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 2002.
Hahnloser et al., “Digital Selection and Analogue Amplification Coexist in a Cortex-Inspired Silicon Circuit”, Nature, vol. 405, pp. 947-951, 2000.
Kasturi, et al., “Effect of Filtering Spacing and Correct Tonotopic Representation on Melody Recognition: Implications for Cochlear Implants,”Proceedings of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2005.
Lan et al., “A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants,”Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 51, pp. 752-760, 2004.
Lazzaro et al., “Winner-take-all networks of O(n) complexity”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Touretzsky, D.S., ed.), vol. 2, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp. 703-711, 1989.
Litvak et al., Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: Modulated and unmodulated Pulse trains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol. 110, No. 1, pp. 368-379, 2001.
Litvak et al., “Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 114, pp. 2066-2078, 2003.
Litvak et al., “Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol. 114, No. 4, pt 1, pp. 2079-2098, 2003.
Litvak et al. “Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 114, pp. 2099-2111, 2003.
Loizou, “Mimicking the human ear,”Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, vol. 15, pp. 101-130, 1998.
Loizou, “Introduction to Cochlear Implants”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 32-42, 1999.
Najafi et al., “A Modular 32-Site Wireless Neural Stimulation Microsystem”, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 12, pp. 2457-2466, 2004.
Nie et al., “Encoding frequency Modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise,”Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 52, pp. 64-73, 2005.
Qin et al., “Role of F0 in speech reception in the presence of interference : simulating aspects of cochlear-implant processing,” 2005, pp. 125 leaves.
Rubinstein et al., “Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation”, Hearing Research 127, pp. 108-118, 1999.
Sarpeshkar et al., “An ultra-low-power programmable analog bionic ear processor,”Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 52, pp. 711-727, 2005.
Sarpeshkar et al., “A Low-Power Wide-Dynamic-Range Analog VLSI Cochlea”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 16, pp. 245-274, 1998.
Sarpeshkar et al., “An Analog Bionic Ear Processor with Zero-Crossing Detection”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 2005.
Sarpeshkar et al., “Scalable Hybrid Computation with Spikes”, Neural Computation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 2003-2038, 2002.
Shannon et al., “Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues,”Science, vol. 270, pp. 303-304, 1995.
Siebert,Circuits, signals, and systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, chapter 17, pp. 527-530, 1986.
Smith et al.,“Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception”, Nature, vol. 416, pp. 87-90, 2002.
Stein, “A Theoretical Analysis of Neuronal Variability”, Biophys. J., vol. 5, pp. 173-194, 1965.
Stickney et al., “Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 118, pp. 2412-2420, 2005.
Wessel et al., “Coding of Time-Varying Electric Field Amplitude Modulations in a Wave-Type Electric Fish”, J. Neurophys, vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 2280-2293, 1996.
Wilson et al., “Better speech recognition with cochlear implants,”Nature, vol. 352, pp. 236-238, 1991.
Zeng, “Temporal pitch in electric hearing,”Hearing Res., vol. 174, pp. 101-106, 2002.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems and methods for providing neural stimulation with an... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for providing neural stimulation with an..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for providing neural stimulation with an... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2652787

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.