Image analysis – Applications – Personnel identification
Reexamination Certificate
2011-08-23
2011-08-23
Bali, Vikkram (Department: 2624)
Image analysis
Applications
Personnel identification
C382S115000, C382S120000, C382S121000, C382S122000, C382S123000
Reexamination Certificate
active
08005273
ABSTRACT:
Methods and systems are provided for analyzing and assessing documents using a writing profile for documents, such as a payment instrument. A method may include providing a document to a computer system. In an embodiment, the method may further include comparing writing in one or more non-signature information fields of the document to at least one forger writing profile representation. In some embodiments, at least one forger writing profile representation may be obtained from at least one non-signature information field of at least one document that includes forged information. In an embodiment, the document may be identified as a document including forged information from an approximate match of at least one forger writing profile representation with writing in the document.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3806704 (1974-04-01), Shinal
patent: 4646351 (1987-02-01), Asbo et al.
patent: 4724542 (1988-02-01), Williford
patent: 5097517 (1992-03-01), Holt
patent: 5454046 (1995-09-01), Carman, II
patent: 5504822 (1996-04-01), Holt
patent: 5559895 (1996-09-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5649117 (1997-07-01), Landry
patent: 5680470 (1997-10-01), Moussa et al.
patent: 5710916 (1998-01-01), Barbara et al.
patent: 5745592 (1998-04-01), Nalwa
patent: 5748780 (1998-05-01), Stolfo
patent: 5757960 (1998-05-01), Murdock et al.
patent: 5828772 (1998-10-01), Kashi et al.
patent: 5909500 (1999-06-01), Moore
patent: 5995953 (1999-11-01), Rindtorff et al.
patent: 6084985 (2000-07-01), Dolfing et al.
patent: 6097834 (2000-08-01), Krouse et al.
patent: 6108444 (2000-08-01), Syeda-Mahmood
patent: 6129273 (2000-10-01), Shah
patent: 6157731 (2000-12-01), Hu et al.
patent: 6212504 (2001-04-01), Hayosh
patent: 6249604 (2001-06-01), Huttenlocher et al.
patent: 6307955 (2001-10-01), Zank et al.
patent: 6393138 (2002-05-01), Chai
patent: 6424728 (2002-07-01), Ammar
patent: 6487310 (2002-11-01), Bishop et al.
patent: 6748102 (2004-06-01), Prakash
patent: 6836555 (2004-12-01), Ericson et al.
patent: 7272259 (2007-09-01), Houle et al.
patent: 7545959 (2009-06-01), Houle et al.
patent: 7545982 (2009-06-01), Houle et al.
patent: 7555162 (2009-06-01), Houle et al.
patent: 7593575 (2009-09-01), Houle et al.
patent: 7606407 (2009-10-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2002/0120846 (2002-08-01), Stewart et al.
patent: 2003/0059098 (2003-03-01), Jones et al.
patent: 2004/0218801 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2004/0223637 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2004/0228513 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2004/0228514 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2004/0237047 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2005/0091500 (2005-04-01), Okazaki
patent: 2007/0110312 (2007-05-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2007/0110313 (2007-05-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2007/0110314 (2007-05-01), Houle et al.
patent: A1. 2 271 657 (1994-04-01), None
patent: WO 96/41298 (1996-12-01), None
Hilton, “Proof of an Unaltered Document,” 1959, The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 601-604.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/714,523 mailed May 20, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,280 mailed May 6, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,157 mailed Jul. 2, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,592 mailed Jun. 3, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,639 mailed May 15, 2009.
Correspondence concerning written submission in Opposition, EPO Application No. Patent No. 03005807.7-2218/1345163; dated Nov. 13, 2009 (S6).
Parascript, LLC: Payee Match Positive Pay Application—Using Total Recognition Technology to Reduce Check Fraud and Increase Efficiencies in Banking and Financial Services Industries. Jan. 2001 (D11).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/714,523 mailed Feb. 20, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/734,738 mailed Feb. 23, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,156 mailed Aug. 23, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,156 mailed Nov. 30, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,592 mailed Dec. 12, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,639 mailed May 2, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,640 mailed May 2, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,640 mailed Jan. 9, 2008.
Notice of Opposition, EPO Application No. /Patent No. 03005807.7-2218/1345163; Mailed Dec. 13, 2007.
International Publication WO 01/41051 by Ketel; International Publication Date Jun. 7, 2001.
Hardcastle, et al., “A computer-based system for the classification of handwriting on cheques. Part 2: Cursive handwriting” Journal of Forensic Science Society, 1990, pp. 97-103.
Schroeder, “A revised method of classifying fraudulent checks in a document examination laboratory,” Forensic Science Journal, vol. 19, No. 3, 1974, pp. 618-635.
Crane, et al., “Does the amount of handwriting on a check constitute a “reasonable amount of a sample”?” Canadian Society of Forensic Science, Mar. 1999, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 39-45.
Decision to maintain European patent in amended form, EPO Application No. Patent No. 03005807.7-2218/1345163; dated Dec. 2, 2010 (S8).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,157 mailed Dec. 11, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/714,523 mailed Aug. 22, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,280 mailed Sep. 15, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,639 mailed Sep. 5, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,156 mailed Jul. 9, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,157 mailed Sep. 2, 2008.
Impedovo, S, Wang, P.S.P, Bunke, H., eds. 1997, Automatic Bankcheck Processing, World Scientific, Singapore. (T1).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,592 mailed Dec. 3, 2008.
Correspondence concerning written submission in Opposition, EPO Application No. Patent No. 03005807.7-2218/1345163; dated Apr. 14, 2008 (S2).
Naske, R.: 1982, Writer recognition by prototype related deformation of handprinted characters, Proc. of the 6th International Conference on pattern Recognition, vol. 2, Munich, Germany, pp. 819-822. (D10/R50).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,280 mailed May 21, 2008.
Interlocutory Decision in Opposition proceeding, EPO Application No. Patent No. 03005807.7-2218/1345163; dated Jan. 27, 2010 (S7).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,591 mailed May 2, 2007.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,591 mailed Aug. 13, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,591 mailed Feb. 4, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,591 mailed Jul. 28, 2009.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,280 mailed Mar. 31, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,157 mailed Mar. 18, 2008.
Said, H., Peake, G., Tan, T. and Baker, K.: 1998, Writer identification from non-uniformly skewed handwriting images, Proc. of the 9th British Machine Vision Conference, pp
Bakker Ronny
Berkhuysen Johan Willem Piere
Blinova Katerina
Houle Gilles
Mason James G.
Bali Vikkram
Computer Sciences Corporation
Meyertons Eric B.
Meyertons Hood Kivlin Kowert & Goetzel P.C.
Zeilberger Daniel
LandOfFree
Systems and methods for identifying a document with forged... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for identifying a document with forged..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for identifying a document with forged... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2620900