Systems and methods for determining relevant information...

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database and file access – Post processing of search results

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S749000, C707S750000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07739279

ABSTRACT:
Techniques are provided for determining relevant information from a document based on document structure. A document is selected and structural elements within the document having a dominance relationship are determined. A first location within the document is selected. The structural element surrounding the first location is determined and the surrounding and non-surrounding structural elements are characterized. Additional documents are associated with the first location in the surrounding structural element based on the surrounding structural element characterization and the non-surrounding structural element characterization. Techniques for dynamically determining annotations for images based on document structure are also provided.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6766316 (2004-07-01), Caudill et al.
patent: 7113943 (2006-09-01), Bradford et al.
patent: 2003/0233224 (2003-12-01), Marchisio et al.
patent: 2004/0095376 (2004-05-01), Graham et al.
patent: 2005/0086592 (2005-04-01), Polanyi et al.
patent: 2007/0022072 (2007-01-01), Kao et al.
Brill, E, “Unsupervised Learning of Disambiguation Rules for Part of Speech Tagging”, in Natural Language Processig Using Very Large Corpora, Kluwer Academic Press, 1997.
Cascading Stylesheets, downloaded from W3C, http://www.w3c.org/Style/CSS Mar. 15, 2006.
Google Search, downloaded from Google, http://www.google.com Mar. 13, 2006.
Ide, N., et al., “Introduction to the Special Issue on Word Sense Disambiguation: the state of the art”, 1998, Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 1-40.
Lamport, L., “Latex A Document Preparation System”, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1986.
Maxwell, J., and Kaplan, R., “An overview of disjunctive constraint satisfaction”, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, 1986, Pittsburgh, PA.
Marcu, D., “The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization”, 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
MSN Search, downloaded from http://search.msn.com Mar. 13, 2006.
Microsoft, “Microsoft Word 2003 Overview”, downloaded from www.office.microsoft.com/office/word/prodinfo/overview.mspx?pf=true Mar. 13, 2006.
Polanyi, L. et al., “Sentential Structure and Discourse Parsing”, 2004, Discourse Annotation Workshop, ACL04.
Radev, D. et al., “Mead Multidocument Summarizer Documentation v3.08”, Oct. 23, 2003, downloaded from http://tangra.si.umich.edu/clair/mead/download/meaddoc-3.08.pdf.
Takaki, T. et al, “Associative Document Retrieval by Query Subtopic Analysis and its Application to Invalidity Patent Search”, 2004, ACM, Proceedings of the 13th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, New York, NY, pp. 399-405.
Thione, G., et al., “LIVETREE: An Integrated Workbench for Discourse Processing”, 2004 Discourse Annotation Workshop, ACL04.
WordNet, downloaded from http://wordnet.princeton.edu Mar. 13, 2006.
Cai. D., et al. “Hierarchical Clustering of WWW Image Search Results Using Visual, Textual and Link Analysis”, 2004, ACM, Proc. of 12th International conference on Multimedia, Technical Session 15: WWW Image retrieval, New York, NY, pp. 952-959.
Chen, F. et al., Multi-Modal Browsing of Images in Web Documents, Proc. of SPIE Document Recognition and Retrieval VI, 1999.
Clusty Image Search, http://clusty.com Mar. 13, 2006.
Grokker, http:www.grokker.com Mar. 13, 2006.
iPhoto, http://www.apple.com/iphoto Mar. 15, 2006.
Li, Z. et al., “Intuitive and Effective Interfaces for WWW Image Search Engines”, 2004, ACM, Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM International conference on Multimedia, Demonstration Session Techical and art demonstrations session 2, New York, NY, pp. 748-749.
Mukherjea, S. et al., “Using clustering and visualization for refining the results of a WWW Image search engine”, 1998, ACM, Proc. of the 1998 Workshop on New Paradigms in Information Visualization and Manipulation, New York, NY, pp. 29-35.
Picasa Product Description, downloaded from http://www.picasa.google.com/index.html Mar. 13, 2006.
Wang, X. et al., Multi-Model similarity propogation and its application for Web image retrieval, 2004, ACM, Proc. of the 12th annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Technical Session 15: WWW image retrieval, New York, NY, pp. 944-951.
Google Image Search, downloaded http://images.google.com Mar. 13, 2006.
Maxwell, J., et al., “A Method for Disjunctive Constraint Satisfaction”, in Current Issues in Parsing Technology, Ed. Masaru Tomita, pp. 173-190, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
Radev, D. et al., “Mead—a platform for multidocument multilingual text summarization”, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisbon, Portugal, May 2004.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems and methods for determining relevant information... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for determining relevant information..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for determining relevant information... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4188295

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.