Amusement devices: games – Including means for processing electronic data – In a chance application
Reexamination Certificate
2000-03-16
2004-04-13
Hotaling, II, John M. (Department: 3713)
Amusement devices: games
Including means for processing electronic data
In a chance application
C463S025000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06719631
ABSTRACT:
FIELD
The present invention relates to gaming systems. In particular, the present invention relates to systems and methods for determining a gaming system event parameter based on a player-established event parameter.
BACKGROUND
Many people enjoy the entertainment provided by various types of gaming systems. For example, many people enjoy playing “scratch-off” style instant lottery games. In this type of game, a player purchases a paper game ticket for a fixed price (e.g., each game ticket may represent a one dollar wager). The player uncovers a portion of the game ticket, such as by scratching off a coating of latex, to reveal one or more symbols (e.g., revealing three symbols each representing a potential payout amount). Based on the revealed symbols, the player is able to determine a payout amount, if any, associated with the game ticket. One reason players enjoy this type of game is the participation the game provides, such as the participation provided by uncovering portions of the game ticket. Players also enjoy the instant gratification provided by such games. That is, players do not need to wait for a nightly lottery drawing, such as a selection of winning lottery numbers, to determine if they have won. Another reason is that players can purchase a number of game tickets and play the game at their convenience.
Conventional instant lottery games, however, have a number of disadvantages. For example, it is expensive to produce the paper game tickets with appropriate symbols and latex coatings. Although different game formats may be made available to players (e.g., “win ten thousand dollars if a ‘yes’ is revealed when you scratch off this area” or “match three numbers on this game ticket to win that dollar amount”), only a limited number of game formats can be printed and distributed to merchants because of the cost associated with producing and distributing game tickets.
Another disadvantage associated with conventional instant lottery systems is that the level of participation that can be provided to a player is limited. For example, a player's participation may be limited to scratching off certain areas on a game ticket. In addition, the gratification that can be provided to a player is limited. For example, a player with five dollars may only be able to purchase and play five game tickets.
These limitations may reduce a player's interest in the game, resulting in fewer games being sold.
To overcome some of these disadvantages, U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,398 discloses an off-line remote lottery system which enables a player to purchase instant-type lottery game outcomes from a central computer. The player views the outcomes on a remotely located gaming computer, such as a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA).
These lottery systems would be further enhanced by an improved gaming system as described herein.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
To alleviate problems inherent in the prior art, the present invention introduces systems and methods for determining a gaming system event parameter based on a player-established event parameter.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a total wager amount, a total number of events, and an event wager amount associated with each of the total number of events are determined. Each of the total number of events is associated with an event result to be indicated to a player. According to one embodiment, the total number of events is greater than one.
In another embodiment, a player-established event parameter is received from a player. The player-established event parameter may comprise: (i) a total wager amount, (ii) a total number of events, or (iii) an event wager amount associated with each of the total number of events. Based on the player-established event parameter, at least one other of (i) the total wager amount, (ii) the total number of events, and (iii) the event wager amount are determined.
Another embodiment of the present invention comprises: means for determining a total wager amount; means for determining a total number of events; and means for determining an event wager amount associated with each of the total number of events, wherein each of the total number of events is associated with an event result to be indicated to a player.
Another embodiment comprises: means for receiving from a player an indication associated with a player-established event parameter, the player-established event parameter comprising one of: (i) a total wager amount, (ii) a total number of events, and (iii) an event wager amount associated with each of the total number of events; and means for determining, based on the player-established event parameter, at least one other of: (i) the total wager amount, (ii) the total number of events, and (iii) the event wager amount.
With these and other advantages and features of the invention that will become hereinafter apparent, the nature of the invention may be more clearly understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention, the appended claims and the several drawings attached herein.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4398708 (1983-08-01), Goldman et al.
patent: 4582324 (1986-04-01), Koza et al.
patent: 4842278 (1989-06-01), Markowicz
patent: 5085436 (1992-02-01), Bennett
patent: 5116055 (1992-05-01), Tracy
patent: 5123649 (1992-06-01), Tiberio
patent: 5276312 (1994-01-01), McCarthy
patent: 5287269 (1994-02-01), Dorrough et al.
patent: 5297205 (1994-03-01), Audebert et al.
patent: 5317135 (1994-05-01), Finocchio
patent: 5327485 (1994-07-01), Leaden
patent: 5499816 (1996-03-01), Levy
patent: 5575717 (1996-11-01), Houriet, Jr. et al.
patent: 5632681 (1997-05-01), Bakoglu et al.
patent: 5709603 (1998-01-01), Kaye
patent: 5787156 (1998-07-01), Katz
patent: 5791990 (1998-08-01), Schroeder et al.
patent: 5816918 (1998-10-01), Kelly et al.
patent: 5871398 (1999-02-01), Schneier et al.
patent: 5885158 (1999-03-01), Torango et al.
patent: 5959277 (1999-09-01), Lucero
patent: 6007426 (1999-12-01), Kelly et al.
patent: 6016338 (2000-01-01), Bansal et al.
patent: 6017032 (2000-01-01), Grippo et al.
patent: 6024640 (2000-02-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6033306 (2000-03-01), De Souza
patent: 6050895 (2000-04-01), Luciano, Jr. et al.
patent: 6068552 (2000-05-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6077163 (2000-06-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6104815 (2000-08-01), Alcorn et al.
patent: 6280328 (2001-08-01), Holch et al.
patent: 6290603 (2001-09-01), Luciano, Jr.
patent: 6568680 (2003-05-01), Moody et al.
patent: 19631052 (1997-02-01), None
patent: 196 31 052 (1997-02-01), None
patent: 0 307 925 (1989-03-01), None
patent: 0 898 253 (1999-02-01), None
patent: 0 898 253 (1999-02-01), None
patent: 0 907 136 (1999-04-01), None
patent: WO 98/55191 (1998-12-01), None
patent: WO 99/04873 (1999-02-01), None
patent: WO 99/26204 (1999-05-01), None
“Silicon Gaming Release Riddle of the Sphinx (TM); new slot game offers players dual win opportunities”; Jul. 29, 1998;Financial News, PR Newswire.
Montgomery, Christine “Casinos bet you'll gamble with with your health” Feb. 22, 1999; Accent, p. 1D The Palm Beach Post.
Rosenberg, Amy S. “Elvis is in the building, and ready to take your money new slot machines give players more than a chance to win” Mar. 21, 1999; News;p. P13A, The Sunday Gazette Mail.
“Riddle of the Sphinx” download date Feb. 23, 2000; http://www.silicongambing.com.
“MoneyTime, the new multi-sensory bonus slot extravaganza form Mikohn, is setting records in increased slot play” download date Mar. 24, 2000; http://www.Mikohn.com/moneytime.htrr.
“Lottery.com Wins the Jackpot With OracleMobile.com; Two Leaders Team up for the Wireless Market” Feb. 23, 2000; Business Editors, Business Wire.
Peterson, Ivars “Computer triumphs over human champion; IBM chess computer Big Blue defeats Garry Kasparov; Brief Article” May 17, 1997; No. 20, vol. 151; p. 300; ISSN: 0036-8423; Science News.
Sokolic, William H. “Gaming and Entertainment in Atlantic City” Jun. 18, 1998;Entertainment; p. 061; The New York Post.
“President Riverboat Casino first to boast over $1 Million ‘Hand pay out’ to slot jackpot winners” Jun. 6, 1991; Lifestyle;
Jorasch James A.
Tulley Stephen C.
Hotaling II John M.
Santisi Steven M.
Walker Digital, LLC
LandOfFree
Systems and methods for determining a gaming system event... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for determining a gaming system event..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for determining a gaming system event... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3224825