Internal-combustion engines – Charge forming device – Heating of combustible mixture
Reexamination Certificate
2001-05-08
2002-05-21
McMahon, Marguerite (Department: 3747)
Internal-combustion engines
Charge forming device
Heating of combustible mixture
C123S557000, C431S208000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06390076
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The systems and methods described herein relate to technologies for delivering fuels and, more particularly, to systems and methods for atomizing fuels for allowing delivery of the atomized fuel to a combustion zone.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Technologies for atomizing fluids and materials are important to a number of industries and to a wide range of applications. One particular application is the delivery of combustible fuels to spark-ignition engines. For this application it is desired to minimize the size of the resulting droplets, or to yield vaporization of the fuel. In fuel delivery systems it is understood that reduced droplet size leads to greater combustion efficiency, which, in turn leads to reduced waste and greater environmental performance.
One common technique for atomizing a liquid fuel is to employ an aspirating gas flow to break-up the liquid into droplets. This technique is employed by carburetors, which are still the predominant fuel delivery system used today for small combustion engines. Although these aspirating systems yield acceptable results for small gasoline powered spark ignition engines, the size of the droplets produced during atomization is still relatively large, and less than optimal for many fuels and more demanding applications. Improvements and modifications that would eliminate or reduce the size of drops provided by the aspiration technique have been suggested, such as screening and flow redirection, but these modification also reduce throughput and create waste problems. Moreover, neither of these improvements address an additional problem with the aspirating technique, which is that the aspirating gas, typically air, can dilute the fuel being delivered, reducing the concentration of the fuel delivered and reducing efficiency of subsequent combustion.
In light of these problems, a considerable amount of research has gone into developing techniques that provide greater atomization of liquid fuels, without requiring an aspirating gas. For example, ultrasonic and electrostatic atomization devices have been developed and employed to further reduce drop size and to eliminate, or reduce, the need for an aspirating gas flow. However, the results achieved with such systems have been mixed and such systems often fail to provide the desired high droplet velocities. Vaporization via heating has also been used, but this technique has resulted in distillation and problems such as fractionation, residue buildup, and decomposition.
By far the most successful alternative to the carburetor has been the fuel injector. Fuel injectors, although more complicated and expensive, provide direct, proportional fuel metering capability under electrical control. Automotive engines in the U.S. now use gasoline fuel injection of two primary types: 1) throttle body injection for the whole engine and 2) port fuel injection for each cylinder. The primary advantages of fuel injection are better specific power (lower fuel consumption per unit power generated) and far better integration with the engine control unit; this results in much lower emissions through better control under a variety of environmental and operating conditions. The control unit can then implement ever more complex and efficient control algorithms, integrating with more sensors to determine optimal settings for the simple control (timing and duration) of the fuel injector, thus further improving fuel economy and reducing exhaust emissions. Accordingly, the fuel injector allows the use of computerized control systems to help optimize performance.
However, fuel injectors efficiencies are still limited by the size of the drops that form the injector spray. Increasingly over the last few years, much experimentation and advanced design has been conducted on the mechanical configuration of fuel injectors to improve their spray/atomization characteristics while keeping their electrical controllability, which is their chief advantage. For example, there has been extensive research and experimentation with forced-air assisted atomization, micro-machining of injection plates, use of flow-swirling effects as well as other approaches. Although significant improvements have occurred, several hurdles still remain. For example, the spray/atomization characteristics of today's fuel injectors is still insufficient to allow for the use of low vapor pressure fuels, also know as heavy fuels, such as kerosene. To date, the new injector designs and processes do not achieve the very fine atomization and subsequent vaporization required for a successful operation as an spark ignition engine with a heavy fuel. The literature does report that one researcher has successfully cold started a small spark-ignition engine with a crude but effective kerosene vaporizing unit, however this technology is not very controllable nor packageable as a compact fuel injector. Nor is it clear that these systems can provide the very lean mixture that will ignite reliably and controllably at the high compressions ratios needed for the efficiencies demanded today. The approach taken by other researchers has been direct injection of heavy fuels into the engine cylinder. It is not clear however, that these attempts at direct injection vaporization of fuel will actually circumvent the problems of cold start and proper running of kerosene-fueled, spark-ignition engine at low ambient temperatures conditions. Moreover, present research in using heavy fuels with spark ignition engines has shown that the existing techniques fail to deliver fuel in a manner that will effectively ignite, causing the build up of liquid fuel in the engine and the eventual fouling of the spark plug.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a fuel delivery system that provides improved vaporization capability to allow for the delivery of conventional low vapor pressure liquid fuels and that can be packaged and engineered as both a direct (in cylinder) or indirect (port/throttle body) fuel injector.
It is further desired to provide fuel delivery systems that can produce atomized volumes of fuel with sufficiently small droplet size to overcome the long-standing problems with cold-start when employing low vapor pressure fuels to fire small, lightweight, heavy fuel-fired, spark-ignition engines.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The systems and methods described herein include fuel atomizers that, inter alia, enable liquid fuels to burn like gases. More specifically, the systems described herein provide fuel atomizer/injectors that enable the use of heavy fuels to fire small, light weight, low compression ratio, spark-ignition piston engines that typically burn gasoline. It is understood that the fuel injection systems described herein create a spray of fine droplets from liquid, or liquid-like filets, by moving the fuels toward their supercritical temperature and releasing the fuels into a region of lower pressure on the gas stability field in the phase diagram associated with the fuels. It is understood that this release into an area of low pressure (relative to the supercritical pressure range of the fuel) causes a fine atomization or vaporization of the fuel. Depending upon the application, gasses, such as oxygen or air, can be entrained or fed into the dispersion to facilitate combustion.
More specifically, the systems and methods of the invention include, in one aspect, processes for injecting a fuel into a combustion engine, wherein the processes involve providing a source of fuel at a pressure near or within the supercritical range associated with the fuel, providing a restrictor adapted for carrying the fuel, passing the fuel through the restrictor and raising the temperature of the fuel passing through the restrictor to a temperature near or within the super critical range associated with the fuel, whereby fuel leaving the restrictor is projected as an atomized spray into a combustion engine. In one practice, the fuel provided to the restrictor is substantially at ambient temperature. To raise the temperature of the fuel, the distal end of the rest
MicroCoating Technologies, Inc.
Muratori Alfred H.
Nacker Wayne E.
LandOfFree
Systems and methods for delivering atomized fluids does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for delivering atomized fluids, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for delivering atomized fluids will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2848808