Systems and methods for conducting a peer review process and...

Data processing: presentation processing of document – operator i – Operator interface – Computer supported collaborative work between plural users

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C434S322000, C434S367000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10087118

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides methods for integrating the peer review process with other applications and facilitating peer review using a user interface linked to a peer review application having knowledge base information and defined rules for: accepting a paper for peer review, assigning the paper to one or more of a defined set of reviewers for review, providing to the reviewers one or more criteria to be used for reviewing and evaluating each paper for enabling each reviewer to create a peer review result, and processing all peer review results for any paper to produce a peer review report. Access to these systems and methods may be provided, for example, on a stand-alone computer or over the Internet, World Wide Web, or an intranet.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4671772 (1987-06-01), Slade et al.
patent: 4937439 (1990-06-01), Wanninger et al.
patent: 5276869 (1994-01-01), Forrest et al.
patent: 5315504 (1994-05-01), Lemble
patent: 5452442 (1995-09-01), Kephart
patent: 5627748 (1997-05-01), Baker et al.
patent: 5743742 (1998-04-01), Morrel-Samuels
patent: 5781732 (1998-07-01), Adams
patent: 5790790 (1998-08-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5845278 (1998-12-01), Kirsch et al.
patent: 6029167 (2000-02-01), Evans
patent: 6119124 (2000-09-01), Broder et al.
patent: 6201948 (2001-03-01), Cook et al.
patent: 6240409 (2001-05-01), Aiken
patent: 6243722 (2001-06-01), Day et al.
patent: 6263121 (2001-07-01), Melen et al.
patent: 6282698 (2001-08-01), Baker et al.
patent: 6301462 (2001-10-01), Freeman et al.
patent: 6347333 (2002-02-01), Eisendrath et al.
patent: 6349296 (2002-02-01), Broder et al.
patent: 6356909 (2002-03-01), Spencer
patent: 6385590 (2002-05-01), Levine
patent: 6405197 (2002-06-01), Gilmour
patent: 6471521 (2002-10-01), Dornbush et al.
patent: 6551107 (2003-04-01), Buckley et al.
patent: 6584466 (2003-06-01), Serbinis et al.
patent: 6611822 (2003-08-01), Beams et al.
patent: 6651071 (2003-11-01), O'Brien et al.
patent: 6658423 (2003-12-01), Pugh et al.
patent: 2002/0029236 (2002-03-01), Burgel et al.
patent: 2002/0068263 (2002-06-01), Mishkin et al.
patent: 2002/0068264 (2002-06-01), Gu et al.
patent: 2002/0076674 (2002-06-01), Kaplan
patent: 2002/0087560 (2002-07-01), Bardwell
patent: 2002/0133395 (2002-09-01), Hughes et al.
patent: 2002/0138590 (2002-09-01), Beams et al.
patent: 2002/0156632 (2002-10-01), Haynes et al.
patent: 2002/0184085 (2002-12-01), Lindia et al.
patent: 2003/0014400 (2003-01-01), Siegel
patent: 2003/0027121 (2003-02-01), Grudnitski et al.
patent: 2003/0061026 (2003-03-01), Umpleby et al.
patent: 2004/0010557 (2004-01-01), Chapman et al.
patent: 2004/0153508 (2004-08-01), Alcorn et al.
patent: 2004/0167787 (2004-08-01), Lynch et al.
patent: 2004/0261016 (2004-12-01), Glass et al.
patent: WO 0072114 (2000-02-01), None
Dave Sullivan, Carol Brown, Norma Nielson, “Computer-Mediated Peer Review Of Student Papers”, Nov./Dec. 1998, Journal of Education for Business. pp. 117-121.
Edward F. Gehringer “Strategies and Mechanisms For Electronic Peer Review”, Oct. 18-21, 2000, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session F1B, pp. 2-7.
S.S.J. Lin, E.Z.F.Liu, S.M. Yuan, “Web-Based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking styles”, Jan. 20, 2001, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, pp. 420-432.
Lisa Guernsay, “Journals see the Internet as a Tool in the Peer-Review System” Apr. 2, 1999, Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 1-4.
Brin, Sergey “Copy Detection Mechanisms for Digital Documents” 1995 ACM pp. 398-409.
EduTie.com et al Aug. 2000 http://www.edutie.com.
Plagiserve.com et al. Oct. 2001 http://web.archive.org/web/20011031085450/www.plagiserve.com/ps.htm.
Stoerger, Sharon et al. “Plagiarism” Oct. 2002.
http://www.fdewb.unimaas.ni/eleum/plagiarism/plagiarism.htm.
Integriguard Web Page (copyright 2000).
Plagiarism.org web pages (copyright 1998-2001).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems and methods for conducting a peer review process and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for conducting a peer review process and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for conducting a peer review process and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3748583

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.