Systems and methods for authoritativeness grading,...

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10232709

ABSTRACT:
Systems and methods for determining the authoritativeness of a document based on textual, non-topical cues. The authoritativeness of a document is determined by evaluating a set of document content features contained within each document to determine a set of document content feature values, processing the set of document content feature values through a trained document textual authority model, and determining a textual authoritativeness value and/or textual authority class for each document evaluated using the predictive models included in the trained document textual authority model. Estimates of a document's textual authoritativeness value and/or textual authority class can be used to re-rank documents previously retrieved by a search, to expand and improve document query searches, to provide a more complete and robust determination of a document's authoritativeness, and to improve the aggregation of rank-ordered lists with numerically-ordered lists.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5278980 (1994-01-01), Pedersen et al.
patent: 5442778 (1995-08-01), Pedersen et al.
patent: 5687364 (1997-11-01), Saund et al.
patent: 5884305 (1999-03-01), Kleinberg et al.
patent: 6112202 (2000-08-01), Kleinberg
patent: 6112203 (2000-08-01), Bharat et al.
patent: 6178417 (2001-01-01), Syeda-Mahmood
patent: 6263351 (2001-07-01), Wolfe
patent: 6269368 (2001-07-01), Diamond
patent: 6285999 (2001-09-01), Page
patent: 6334131 (2001-12-01), Chakrabarti et al.
patent: 6336112 (2002-01-01), Chakrabarti et al.
patent: 6389436 (2002-05-01), Chakrabarti et al.
patent: 6446061 (2002-09-01), Doerre et al.
patent: 6453307 (2002-09-01), Schapire et al.
patent: 6502081 (2002-12-01), Wiltshire et al.
patent: 6601075 (2003-07-01), Huang et al.
patent: 6606620 (2003-08-01), Sundaresan et al.
patent: 6751600 (2004-06-01), Wolin
patent: 6862710 (2005-03-01), Marchisio
patent: 6910843 (2005-06-01), Saw et al.
patent: 6928425 (2005-08-01), Grefenstette et al.
patent: 2001/0016846 (2001-08-01), Chakrabarti et al.
patent: 2002/0138478 (2002-09-01), Schwartz et al.
patent: 2003/0061200 (2003-03-01), Hubert et al.
patent: 2003/0061201 (2003-03-01), Grefenstette et al.
patent: 2003/0101166 (2003-05-01), Uchino et al.
patent: 2003/0217047 (2003-11-01), Marchisio
patent: 2005/0192957 (2005-09-01), Newbold
Dwork et al. “Rank Aggregation Methods for the Web” http://www10.org/cdrom/papers/577/ pp. 1-30. May 2001. ACM Press.
Adam et al., “A Content-Based Authorization Model for Digital Libraries”, IEEE, Mar./Apr. 2002, pp. 296-315.
Freund et al., “Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm”, AT&T Research, http://www.research.att.com/orgs/ssr/people/(yoav,schapire)/, 1996.
Sean Slattery et al., “Discovering Test Set Regularities in Regulation Domains,” Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000), Sep. 17, 2000, pp. 895-902.
Huan Chang et al., “Learning to Create Customized Authority Lists,” Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000), Jun. 29, 2000, pp. 127-134.
David Cohn et al., “Learning to Probabilistically Identify Authoritative Documents,” Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000), Jun. 29, 2000, pp. 167-174.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems and methods for authoritativeness grading,... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for authoritativeness grading,..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for authoritativeness grading,... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3791873

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.