Systems and methods for assessing a document using...

Image analysis – Pattern recognition – Unconstrained handwriting

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C382S119000, C382S187000, C715S268000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07555162

ABSTRACT:
Methods and systems are provided for analyzing and assessing documents using a writing profile for documents, such as a payment instrument. A method may include providing a document to a computer system. In some embodiments, the method may further include obtaining information on writing in an information field of the document. In certain embodiments, the obtained written information in the information field and written information in at least one other information field may be compared to at least one writing profile representation. The writing profile representation may be obtained from at least one other document. In one embodiment, at least one of the writing profile representations may include written information from the information field and written information from at least one of the other information fields obtained from at least one of the other documents. In some embodiments, the comparisons may be used to verify the obtained written information.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3806704 (1974-04-01), Shinal
patent: 4646351 (1987-02-01), Asbo et al.
patent: 4724542 (1988-02-01), Williford
patent: 5097517 (1992-03-01), Holt
patent: 5454046 (1995-09-01), Carman, II
patent: 5559895 (1996-09-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5680470 (1997-10-01), Moussa et al.
patent: 5710916 (1998-01-01), Barbara et al.
patent: 5745592 (1998-04-01), Nalwa
patent: 5748780 (1998-05-01), Stolfo
patent: 5757960 (1998-05-01), Murdock et al.
patent: 5828772 (1998-10-01), Kashi et al.
patent: 5909500 (1999-06-01), Moore
patent: 5995953 (1999-11-01), Rindtorff et al.
patent: 6084985 (2000-07-01), Dolfing et al.
patent: 6108444 (2000-08-01), Syeda-Mahmood
patent: 6157731 (2000-12-01), Hu et al.
patent: 6236740 (2001-05-01), Lee
patent: 6249604 (2001-06-01), Huttenlocher et al.
patent: 6307955 (2001-10-01), Zank et al.
patent: 6393138 (2002-05-01), Chai
patent: 6424728 (2002-07-01), Ammar
patent: 6464134 (2002-10-01), Page
patent: 6487310 (2002-11-01), Bishop et al.
patent: 6836555 (2004-12-01), Ericson et al.
patent: 7272259 (2007-09-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2003/0059098 (2003-03-01), Jones et al.
patent: 2004/0218801 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2004/0228513 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2004/0228514 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2004/0237047 (2004-11-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2005/0091500 (2005-04-01), Okazaki
patent: 2007/0110311 (2007-05-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2007/0110312 (2007-05-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2007/0110313 (2007-05-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2007/0110314 (2007-05-01), Houle et al.
patent: 2 271 657 (1994-04-01), None
Dikstra et al., “IRIS An Image Recognition and Interpretation System for the Dutch Postbank”, Sep. 3, 2000, pp. 23-26, Pattern Recognition, 2000 Proceedings.
Knerr et al., “Hidden Markov Model Based Word Recognition and Its Application to Legal Amount Reading on French Checks”, Jun. 1998, pp. 404-419, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 70, No. 3.
Suen et al., “Automatic Recognition of Handwritten Data on Cheques-Fact or Fiction?”, Nov. 1999, pp. 1287-1295, Pattern Recognition Letters, North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam, NL, vol. 20, No. 11-13.
Srihari et al., “Document Image-Processing System For Name and Address Recognition”, Dec. 21, 1996, pp. 379-391, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, Wiley and Sons, New York, vol. 7, No. 4.
Kaufmann et al., “Amount Translation and Error Localization in Check Processing Using Syntax-Directed Translation,” 1998, pp. 1530-1534, Proc. Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Brisbane, Australia.
International Search Report for European Application No. 03005807.7 mailed May 20.
Office Communication for European Application No. 03005807.7 mailed Mar. 9.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/714,523, filed Nov. 14, 2003, Houle et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,280, filed Dec. 12, 2003, Houle et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/734,738, filed Dec. 12, 2003, Houle et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,157, filed Dec. 19, 2003, Houle et al.
Notice of Opposition, EPO Application No. /Patent No. 03005807.7-2218/1345163; Mailed Dec. 13, 2007.
International Publication WO 01/41051 by Ketel; International Publication Date Jun. 7, 2001.
CSC: ETA-Fraud Detection brochure (1 page).
Hardcastle, et al., “A computer-based system for the classification of handwriting on cheques. Part 2: Cursive handwriting” Journal of Forensic Science Society, 1990, pp. 97-103.
Schroeder, “A revised method for classifying fraudulent checks in a document examination laboratory,” Forensic Science Journal, vol. 19, No. 3, 1974, pp. 618-635.
Crane, et al., “Does the amount of handwriting on a check constitute a “reasonable amount of a sample”?” Canadian Society of Forensic Science, Mar. 1999, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 39-45.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,592 mailed Dec. 3, 2008 available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/714,523 mailed Feb. 20, 2008, available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/734,738 mailed Feb. 23, 2007, available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,592 mailed Dec. 12, 2007 available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,639 mailed May 2, 2007 available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,640 mailed May 2, 2007 available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,640 mailed Jan. 9, 2008 available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,591 mailed May 2, 2007 available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Communication” for U.S. Appl. No. 10/714,523 mailed Jan. 8, 2009, available in PAIR.
Correspondence concerning written submission in Opposition, EPO Application No. Patent No. 03005807.7-2218/1345163; dated Jan. 22, 2009 (S3).
U.S. Patent and TrademarK Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,280 mailed Feb. 2, 2009, available in PAIR.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” for U.S. Appl. No. 11/649,640 mailed Jan. 27, 2009 available in PAIR.
Arazi, B.: 1977, Handwriting identification by means of run-length measurements, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cybernetics SMC-7 (12), 878-881.
Arazi, B.: 1983, Automatic handwriting identification based on the external properties of the samples, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cybernetics SMC-13 (4), 635-642.
Drouhard, J., Sabourin, R. and Godbout, M.: 1995, A comparative study of the k nearest neighbours, threshold and neural network classifiers for handwritten signature verification using an enhanced directional pdf, Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, Canada, pp. 807-810.
Klement, V.: 1983, An application system for the computer-assisted identification of handwriting, Proc. Int. Carnahan Conf. on Security Technol., Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 75-79.
Kondo, S. and Attachoo, B.: 1986, Model of handwriting process and its analysis, Proc. ICPR, pp. 562-565.
Maarse, F., Schomaker, L. and Teulings, H.L.: 1988, Automatic identification of writers, in G. van der Veer and G. Mulder (eds), Human-Computer Interaction: Psychonomic Aspects, Springer, New York, pp. 353-360.
Maarse, F. and Thomassen, A.: 1983, Produced and perceived writing slant: differences between up and down strokes, ACTA Psychologica 54 (1-3), 131-147.
Plamondon, R. and Srihari, S.N.: 2000, On-line and off-line handwriting recognition: a comprehensive survey, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22 (1), 63-84.
Plamondon, R. and Lorette, G.: 1989, Automatic signature verification and writer identification-the state of the art, Pattern Recognition 22 (2), 107-131.
Sabourin, R. and Drouhard, J.: 1992, Off-line signature verification using directional pdf

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems and methods for assessing a document using... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for assessing a document using..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for assessing a document using... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4087718

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.