Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices – circuits – and – Signal converting – shaping – or generating – Synchronizing
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-20
2001-09-25
Le, Dinh T. (Department: 2816)
Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices, circuits, and
Signal converting, shaping, or generating
Synchronizing
C327S291000, C327S149000, C327S245000, C327S270000, C327S237000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06294938
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The field of the invention is systems which synchronize clocks and more particulary to systems which use delay lock loops.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In a typical processing system there is an oscillator which generates a master clock for operating all the circuits within that system. The clocks which operate the system are all generated from the same master clock oscillator. The individual clocks that are generated must operate in a known relationship to each other. In general, these clocks are desirably operated in precise phase with one another. This is typically achieved with the use of phase lock loops (PLLs) and delay lock loops (DLLs). PLLs are very effective in synchronizing clocks to one another, and DLLs are also used for this purpose. Sometimes different elements of the system have different interfaces and are operating at different frequencies. When this is the case, it is necessary that there be two locking mechanisms. One would be a normal PLL which is analog, and the other would be a DLL. The reason for using a DLL instead of two PLLs is that the transfer functions of two PLLs would be very similar to each other and could result in the two resonating together. A DLL has a substantially different transfer function than a PLL so that the likelihood of them resonating can be completely discounted.
One of the problems with DLLs is that there is necessarily a variable delay included in the DLL and the magnitude of that variable delay is advantageously large for functional reasons, but disadvantageously large because it then requires more space on the integrated circuit die. Thus there is a trade-off between functionality and efficient use of space on the integrated circuit die. For a reasonable sized delay, there are two major problems that have existed. One is that lock of the two clocks being synchronized may occur when the amount of delay is very close to zero or very close to the maximum amount of delay. In such a case, a slight change can cause the delay to switch between the maximum and the minimum delay. The reason for this is that there is a counter which controls the amount of delay which counts from all zeros to all ones. When this counter is incremented from the all ones state it will cycle around to the all zeros state. Similarly if the counter is in the all zeros condition and is decremented, it will cycle to the all ones state. If the counter, in the lock condition, is near or at all ones, a small increase will force it to the all zeros condition. This will result in going from a maximum delay to the minimum delay and thus losing lock. Similarly, if it's at near zero in delay so that the counter is at near all zeros and there needs to be a reduction in the amount of delay to retain lock, the counter can go from all zeros to all ones, in which case it goes from the minimum delay to the maximum delay again causing the loss of lock.
Another problem is that if the amount of delay provided in the DLL is not large enough, then it may not be possible to obtain lock if the system is not designed with this in mind. The margin for error in being able to obtain lock may not be adequate. There may be designs that are perfectly reasonable for a circuit board for other criteria, but which will result in requiring an amount of delay not available and thus not attaining lock. Although systems can nearly always be designed so as to require less delay, those kinds of re-designs may not be the kind that a customer or user would want to do. These things can cause delays in bringing a product to market, there may be large re-design costs, or it may be an issue of allocation of resources that is not available or is very costly to the user.
Thus, there is a need for a DLL which can attain lock for a wide range of delay requirements and can avoid attaining lock at the counter boundaries. Shown in
FIG. 1
is a system using a DLL according to the prior art which has the two shortcomings described above. Shown in
FIG. 1
is a system
10
comprising a PLL
12
, a divider
14
shown as VCO CLK divider
14
, a divider
16
shown as G clock (GCLK) divider
16
, a delay line
18
, a counter
20
, a phase detector
22
, a buffer
24
, a buffer
26
, a buffer
28
, an output pad
30
, an output pad
32
, an output pad
34
, an input pad
36
, a delay matched circuit
40
, connections
42
and
44
, an external circuit
46
, and an external circuit
48
. Typically, except for delay matched circuit
40
, external pads
42
and
44
, and external circuits
46
and
48
, system
10
would be a single integrated circuit which would have many other elements, such as an ALU, included. Delay line
18
, counter
20
, and phase detector
22
are typical elements of a DLL. For functionality, of course, there must a source for two clocks, such as PLL
12
, VCO CLK divider
14
, and GCLK divider
16
coming into the DLL
In operation PLL
12
receives an input system clock (SYSCLK) and provides two clock outputs. One clock operates at twice the frequency of the other. The one operating at the higher frequency is VCO CLK and the one operating at the lower frequency is GCLK. Divider
14
divides VCO CLK by an integer which is at least 2, and divider
16
divides GCLK by half of what divider
14
performs its division by. Divider
14
provides, as an output, a source clock to delay line
18
. Divider
16
provides a reference clock to phase detector
22
. The source clock must have a 50% duty cycle. The reference clock does not have the same requirement. Delay line
18
receives an input from counter
20
and, based on the output of counter
20
, provides delayed source clock to output buffers
24
,
26
, and
28
which are phased delayed in relation the source clock. Output buffers
24
,
26
,
28
provide clock out
1
, clock out
2
, and clock out
3
, respectively, on output pads
30
,
32
, and
34
, respectively, in response to the delayed clock. Delay matched circuit
40
is coupled to output pads
30
,
32
, and
34
; to external pads
42
and
44
; and to input pad
36
. External pads
42
and
44
receive clock out
1
and clock out
2
for use by external circuits
48
and
46
via delayed match circuit
40
. Delayed match circuit
40
is also coupled to output pad
34
which carries clock out
3
to input pad
36
. Delayed match circuit
40
is for the purpose of, as best as is reasonably possible, matching delays so that the delay between pad
30
and
42
, the delay between
32
and
44
, and the delay between
34
and
36
are the same. Phase detector
22
receives a feedback clock from pad
36
and the reference clock from divider
16
.
In operation phase detector
22
compares the phase relationship of these two clocks and provides an output U/D (up/down) to counter
20
. Phase detector
22
provides a clock output to counter
20
to inform the counter if it is to be changed and at the precise time for that change to occur. One technique is to make a determination every five clock cycles. Thus, if changes are needed, a change will only occur on every fifth clock cycle. The U/D signal indicates to the counter if it is to be incremented or decremented and the clock output provides the timing for such increment or decrement. The magnitude of the counter change is limited to an increment or decrement of one for any given occurrence of the clock output. Counter
20
provides an output to delay line
18
which selects the magnitude of the delay. Source clock is delayed to provide the delayed source clock by the amount of delay selected by counter
20
. For the case when the feedback clock is leading reference clock, the counter is incremented to increase the amount of delay. When the feedback clock is lagging the reference clock, counter
20
is decremented to reduce the amount of delay in delay line
18
. When the feedback clock and the reference clock are in phase, phase generator
22
does not provide the output clock to counter
20
.
With this configuration, if delay line
18
has an available delay less than the period of the source clock, there can be the
Coddington John Deane
Hui Chau-Shing
Clingan, Jr. James L.
Le Dinh T.
Motorola Inc.
LandOfFree
System with DLL does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System with DLL, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System with DLL will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2505658