System to quantify consumer preferences

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07904331

ABSTRACT:
A system to determine preference information of part worth values associated with a consumer and a product includes determination of a plurality of attributes of the product, each of the plurality of attributes associated with a plurality of attribute levels, determination of a plurality of piles of attributes based on a first indication of the consumer, each of the plurality of piles comprising one or more of the plurality of attributes, determination of a ranked order of a plurality of attributes of one of the plurality of piles, determination of a relative importance of one or more of the plurality of attributes of the one of the plurality of piles based on a second indication of the consumer, determination of a scale value of one or more attribute levels of the one or more of the plurality of attributes of the one of the plurality of piles based on a third indication of the consumer, and determination of a part worth value associated with an attribute level of one of the plurality of attributes of the one of the plurality of piles based on a determined scale value of the attribute level and a determined relative importance of the one of the plurality of attributes.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5041972 (1991-08-01), Frost
patent: 5124911 (1992-06-01), Sack
patent: 5583763 (1996-12-01), Atcheson et al.
patent: 5974396 (1999-10-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 5983220 (1999-11-01), Schmitt
patent: 6012051 (2000-01-01), Sammon et al.
patent: 6029195 (2000-02-01), Herz
patent: 6134532 (2000-10-01), Lazarus et al.
patent: 6208989 (2001-03-01), Dockter et al.
patent: 6236975 (2001-05-01), Boe et al.
patent: 6236978 (2001-05-01), Tuzhilin
patent: 6298348 (2001-10-01), Eldering
patent: 6321221 (2001-11-01), Bieganski
patent: 6826541 (2004-11-01), Johnston et al.
patent: 2002/0026390 (2002-02-01), Ulenas et al.
patent: 2002/0065721 (2002-05-01), Lema et al.
patent: 2002/0087388 (2002-07-01), Keil et al.
patent: 2009/0292588 (2009-11-01), Duzevik et al.
patent: 2009/0327163 (2009-12-01), Swan et al.
“Active Sales Assistant 2001”, Active Decisions, Inc., Jun. 2001, 12 pages.
“Active Buyer's Guide: Dogs,” Copyright © 2002, Active Decisions, Inc., downloaded frm http://www.activebuyerguide.com/abg
av, Jul. 26, 2002, 10 pages.
“The ACA/HB Module for Hierarchical Bayes Estimation”,Sawthooth Software, Inc. (Aug. 1999).
Magidson, Jay, and Vermunt, Jeroen K., “Latent Class Models”.
“The CBC Latent Class Technical”,Copyright 2000, Sawtooth Software, Inc.
Acatech, “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis” (Version 4),Copyright Sawtooth Software, Inc. (Apr. 1993).
McCullough, Dick, “Trade-off Analysis”,A Survey of Commercially Available Techniques, Macro Consulting, Inc. Mar. 3, 2000. Jun. 25, 2008 ,www.macroinc.com> retrieved from http://web.archive.org.
Srinivasan, V. and Su Park, Chan “Surprising Robustness of the Self-Explicated Approach to Customer Preference Structure Measurement,”Journal of Marketing Research, vol. XXXI/v (May 1997), 286-291.
Wittink, Dick R. and Keil, Sev K. “Continuous Conjoint Analysis”.
Huber, Joel, “What We have Learned from 20 Years of Conjoint Research”:When to use Self-Explicated, Graded Pairs, Full Profiles or Choice Experiments.
2001 Conference Presentations Set (Spring 2001),Sawtooth Solutions.
Orma, Bryan “Helping Managers Understand the Value of Conjoint”,Copyright, Sawtooth Software, 1996.
Pinnell, Jon and Olsen, Pam “Using Choice-Based Conjoint to Assess Brand Strength and Price Sensitivity”,Copyright 1996, Sawtooth Software.
Pinnell, Jon (1994) “Multistage Conjoint Methods to Measure Price Sensitivity”.
Dawson, Neal V. (91-94) “A Model of Patients' Preferences in Serious Illness”, http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/medteprp/list8.htm, (Download date Mar. 30, 2001).
Marketswitch: “Our Industry”, http://www.marketswitch.com/products/industry.html, (Download dated Apr. 11, 2001.
Kanninen, Barbara, K. (Jan. 1, 2000-Jun. 6, 2002) “Optimal Experimental Design for Nonmarket Choice Experiments”, http://www.espa.gov
cerga—abstracts/grants/99/deci/kanninen.html, (Download dated Apr. 11, 2001).
Rollins, Kimberly and Beckett, Alexandria, “Using a Random Utility Model to Measure Willingness to Pay for Public Attributes of Green Goods: Implications for Market Provision of Environmental Quality”,International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, Microbehavior and Macroresults IIFET 2000, http://ors.edu/Dept/IIFET/2000/abstracts/rollins.html (Download date Apr. 11, 2001).
Ardila, Sergio, Quiroga, Ricardo and Vaughan, William J. (12/98m ENV-126, E) Publications “A Review of the Use of Contingent Valuation Methods in Project Analysis at the Inter-American Development Bank”, http://www.iadb.org/sds/publication/publication—178—e.htm (Download date Apr. 11, 2001).
Understanding Market Segmentation, Technical Paper From DDS Research, httop://www.dssearch.com/marketsegment/Library/Segment/understanding.asp.
Tyner, Mary Jane and Weiner, Jonathan—MACRO—“Optimal Pricing Strategies Through Conjoint Analysis”, http://www.macroinc.com/html/art/s—opt.html (Download dated Apr. 10, 2001).
“Customer Targeting Models”,Opti-Market Consulting, http://www.opti-market.com/targeting.htm (Download date Apr. 10, 2001).
Johnson, Chad, Methodologies and Capabilities: “Market stimulation software becomes smarter all the time”,Answers Research, Inc. http://answersresearch.com/methodlogies/article5.html (Download Apr. 10, 2001).
Market Research Application Example, “Conjoint Analysis:The Presure”, Statistics & Operations Research, http://www.sas.com/rnd/app/da/market/mraexsim.html (Download date Apr. 10, 2001).
“Research Triangle Institute: Conjoint Analysis Software Tools”, http://www.rti.org/difference/conjoint—tools.cfm (Download date Apr. 10, 2001).
Decision Support Inc., A Full Service Market Research & Consulting Firm, “Services Offered” http://www.decisionsupportinc.com/services.html (Download date Apr. 10, 2001).
Landsend.com, “My Personal Shopper: Like having a personal wardrobe” http://www.landend.com/vpsEntry.cgi?mode=GRAPHIC&refer=c.../&sid=098702323344 (Download date Apr. 11, 2001).
Direct1.com “About Direct1” http://direct1.com/company/whatdowedo.html (Download date Apr. 3, 2001).
Discretechoice.com “White Paper: Sample Discrete Choice Analysis”, http://www.discretechoice.com/analysis.html (Download date Jan. 2, 2001).
Minetheme Knowledge Bank “Information: that Inspires”. http://www.mindtheme.com/knowledge/trst.asp (Download Apr. 10, 2001).
Dominator 2000™ Market Stimulation Model From DSS Research, Dominator 2000™http://dssresearch.com/library/Dominator/dominator.asp (Download date Apr. 10, 2001).
Conjoint Analysis Tools, http:www.whitehorse.com.au/˜prosoft/statist.htm (Download date Feb. 14, 2001).
Johnson, Richard M., Sawtooth Technologies: “Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer Values” reprinted fromJournal of Marketing Research, published by the American Marketing Association, vol. 11 (May 1974), pp. 121-127, http://www.sawtooth.com
ews/library/articles/johnson.htm (Download Feb. 14, 2001).
McCullough, Dick “The Cake Method: A Proprietary Hybrid Conjoint Approach”, Macro Consulting, Inc. http://www.macroinc.com/html/art/s—cak.html (Download date Dec. 6, 2000).
ACA, “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis”, http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/ACA.htm (Download date Nov. 30, 2000).
Analysis: Conjoint Case Example From DDS Research—Marketing Research For . . . , http://www.dssresearch.com/conjoint/CaseExample/Analysis.asp (Download date Apr. 2, 2001).
A Reviw of Conjoint Analysis, Technical Paper From DSS Research: “Understanding Conjoint Analysis”, http://www/dssresearch.com/c

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System to quantify consumer preferences does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System to quantify consumer preferences, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System to quantify consumer preferences will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2635668

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.