Electricity: motive power systems – Reciprocating or oscillating motor – Energizing winding circuit control
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-21
2001-10-09
Ponomarenko, Nicholas (Department: 2834)
Electricity: motive power systems
Reciprocating or oscillating motor
Energizing winding circuit control
C361S160000, C361S154000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06300733
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to correcting the drift associated with the determination of position and flux in variable reluctance devices such as solenoids. This drift is present in systems that integrate a measured parameter of the device in order to determine flux and position.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The prior art related to the present invention includes many techniques to determine the position of a solenoid. Some systems add a position sensor, which increases the cost and complexity. Others have attempted to infer position from signals that either exist on the system or are cheaper to generate than including a position sensor. Jayawant (U.S. Pat. NO. 5,467,244) describes a measurement system that balances the position of a solenoid. Stupak (U.S. Pat. No. 4,659,969) uses a Hall sensor to measure flux. Gingrich (U.S. Pat. No. 4,368,501) shows how to generate flux (&PHgr;) from a second winding. The desirability of flux information comes from the approximation equation relating flux (&PHgr;), measured current (I) through the winding, and position:
x′=I/&PHgr; Equation 1
where x′ is only an approximation of true position x. In many systems the approximation is either good enough, or it is not too difficult to transform x′ into x.
Flux (&PHgr;) can be obtained from the applied inductive voltage VL, as:
VL =Vapplied−I * R Equation 2
where I is the measured current, R is the resistance of the coil in the solenoid, and Vapplied is the voltage applied across the coil. VL and flux are related with the equation:
V
L
=
n
*
ⅆ
Φ
ⅆ
t
Equation 3
where n is the number of turns on the solenoid.
Integrating equation 3 gives:
Φ
+
k2
=
∫
ⅆ
Φ
ⅆ
t
ⅆ
t
=
∫
V
L
n
ⅆ
t
Equation 4
where k2 is a constant having to do with the initialization of the integrator.
Therefore the known applied voltage can be integrated, combined with the measured current, and used to obtain x′ for a reasonably behaved device. But a problem in all of the systems that measure flux by doing an integration, such as Gingrich's, is that over time the integral will drift. Since the value of flux drifts from its correct value, the determination of x′ will also drift (equation 1). The system will be accurate when the flux integrator can be initialized to a known state, such as zero when an unpowered system is first energized. As time passes, the drift will cause the integrator to deviate more and more from the correct value. Knowing the absolute position from some other information can also be used to initialize the integrator, since equation 1 can be solved for flux (current I and position x′ being known). Certain systems, such as engine valves, quickly move from one known location to another and so are not a problem. But many valves and solenoids must hold a driven position for long periods of time, and cannot rely upon the chance that they will move to a known boundary condition and allow the integrator to be corrected within the short period of time that drift remains a small error.
The derived measurement of flux is not the only way to control position. Others have made systems that attempt to control the position of a solenoid by holding a constant current in the coil of the solenoid without employing feedback. Still others have attempted to measure the inductance of the device, since inductance can usually be converted into position for this type of device. One such method is to apply a known high frequency drive and use the resultant high frequency ripple in a measured signal such as current to calculate inductance. The constant current drive method has errors relating to the lack of any feedback, and the inductance measurement technique has been hampered with noise and measurement accuracy problems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The system of the present invention combines ideas from the above systems in a new way to produce a system having the best characteristics of each. High frequency position information is acquired with the current over flux (I/&PHgr;) technique described above. This method gives excellent results from frequencies above the high frequency mechanical response of the system (the fastest it can practically go), to frequencies as low a 1 Hz or lower, dependent upon the accuracy of the flux integral in equation 4. The low frequency drift of the integrator in this new system is then corrected by using one of a number of techniques, to be described below, allowing performance from DC to high frequency.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3671814 (1972-06-01), Dick
patent: 3697840 (1972-10-01), Koch
patent: 4434450 (1984-02-01), Gareis
patent: 4450427 (1984-05-01), Gareis
patent: 4608620 (1986-08-01), Hines
patent: 4656400 (1987-04-01), Pailthrop et al.
patent: 4665348 (1987-05-01), Stupak
patent: 5117869 (1992-06-01), Kolchinsky
patent: 5406440 (1995-04-01), Wieloch
patent: 5442515 (1995-08-01), Wallaert
patent: 5546268 (1996-08-01), Hurley et al.
patent: 5635784 (1997-06-01), Seale
patent: 5933313 (1999-08-01), Furukawa
patent: 6208497 (2001-03-01), Seale et al.
Atwood Pierce
Caseiro Chris A.
Jones Judson H.
Ponomarenko Nicholas
Scanlon Patrick R.
LandOfFree
System to determine solenoid position and flux without drift does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System to determine solenoid position and flux without drift, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System to determine solenoid position and flux without drift will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2574821