Prime-mover dynamo plants – Electric control – Engine control
Reexamination Certificate
2002-03-04
2002-11-05
Waks, Joseph (Department: 2834)
Prime-mover dynamo plants
Electric control
Engine control
Reexamination Certificate
active
06476510
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to power regulation. More specifically, this invention relates to control of a power source based at least in part on a power demand by a load.
2. Description of Related Art
FIGS. 1 and 2
show two conventional systems for power generation. In
FIG. 1
, an engine produces mechanical power that is inputted to a generator. For example, the engine may rotate a shaft that is coupled to the generator (possibly through a gearbox or transmission). The generator converts the mechanical power to electrical power that supplies a load. In response to an error between a predetermined engine speed output, and an actual engine output speed as measured by a speed sensor, a governor provides a command to a fuel supply controller, which controls the supply of fuel to the engine. Because the control of the engine is based upon the engine output speed, this type of control system may be called a speed reactive system.
A generator as shown in the system of
FIG. 1
may produce electricity in either an alternating current (a.c.) or direct current (d.c.) form, depending on the requirements of the load. If a.c. is required, then the frequency of the current supplied by the generator must typically be regulated to within a small margin in order to avoid damage to the load. In the United States and Canada, e.g., a.c. current is typically maintained at 60 Hz. Because the rotational speed of the generator rotor determines the frequency of the electrical power produced, it is essential that the speed of the engine be regulated to a constant value.
Even if the load requires d.c. from the generator (possibly supplied via a rectifier or inverter), it may also be important to regulate the speed of the engine. In this case, the voltage of the d.c. output by the generator depends upon the speed of the engine. Although small variations in output voltage (i.e., ripples) maybe filtered out, avoiding damage to the load will typically require that an average voltage output of the generator (and hence an average speed of the engine) be kept constant. That is, even though the predetermined engine speed for a system according to
FIG. 1
may yield good results over a broad range of conditions with respect to some criterion (e.g., minimal fuel consumption), one single value will typically be sub-optimal with respect to changes in such variables as pressure, temperature, and load power demand. Because fuel costs may account for 80% of the operating costs of such a system, increasing efficiency by even a few percent may result in a considerable cost savings.
Another shortcoming of speed reactive systems is that they operate without any knowledge of the power actually demanded by the load. Because the system reacts only to the engine output speed, its response is slowed by the inertia of the moving components in the power generation path, as no command with respect to speed may be met until the components are accumulated or decelerated as necessary.
FIG. 2
shows another system for engine speed regulation that is used, for example, in propeller-driven aircraft. In this system, it is also desirable to maintain engine output at a constant speed. An operator varies the power supplied by the engine to the load by commanding the final supply controller to adjust the supply of fuel to the engine. In order to maintain a constant engine output speed another controller varies the characteristics of the load. In response to a speed increase (possibly due to a command to increase power), for example, the controller may vary the pitch of the propeller, thereby increasing torque and maintaining a constant engine speed. For a given output speed, however, an engine will typically perform optimally (for example, with respect to fuel consumption) at only one particular power output value. Therefore, a control system as shown in
FIG. 2
may also perform sub-optimally during much of its operation.
SUMMARY
In a system, method, and apparatus for power regulation as disclosed herein, a load power demand value determines a power supply behavior that is optimal with respect to some criterion (e.g., fuel consumption). Such a system, method and apparatus also complies with load demand requirements more quickly and efficiently than existing approaches.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3701556 (1972-10-01), Richmond
patent: 4341071 (1982-07-01), Abo et al.
patent: 5028804 (1991-07-01), Lauw
patent: 5276353 (1994-01-01), Kobayashi et al.
patent: 5539258 (1996-07-01), Sutton et al.
patent: 5552640 (1996-09-01), Sutton et al.
patent: 5629568 (1997-05-01), Mertens
patent: 5646510 (1997-07-01), Kumar
patent: 5751069 (1998-05-01), Rajashekara et al.
patent: 5949146 (1999-09-01), VandenBerghe
patent: 6405522 (2002-06-01), Pont et al.
patent: 0 643 474 (1995-03-01), None
patent: 0 644 647 (1995-03-01), None
patent: 0 903 469 (1999-03-01), None
patent: WO 99/07996 (1999-02-01), None
International Search Report dated Dec. 12, 2001 for PCT Application No. PCT/CA01/00670, filed Nov. 5, 2001.
Ice 3 on Right Tracks for High-Speed Rail Harmonisation—Passenger Rail Management, vol. 4, Issue 4, Nov. 1996, by Jurgen Prem., p. 19.
All Aboard for High-Speed Rail—Mechanical Engineering, Sep. 1996, by David Herman, pp. 94-97.
American Flyer—Popular Mechanics, Nov. 1996, by Jim Wilson, pp. 56-59.
Le Difficule Avenement Du <<Cisalpino>>—Rail Passion, N Jul. 10, 1996, by Philippe Herisse, pp. 46-48.
Quatre Pistes Pour L'Apres Grande Vitesse, La vie du Rail & des transports, N 2541, Apr. 10, 1996, by Dumont, Francois et al., pp. 14-18.
A Bord Du Nouveau Train Pendulaire Italien, La vie du Rail & des transports, N 2539, Mar. 27, 1996, p. 11.
Refined Gas Turbines Offer Lower Costs—Railway Gazette International, Jun. 1994, p. 401.
Le Pendulaire Dans la Course A L'ecosse—La vie du Rail & des transports, N. 2610, Sep. 3, 1997, by Jean-Paul Masse, p. 10.
Bombardier Inc.
Pillsbury & Winthrop LLP
Waks Joseph
LandOfFree
System, method, and apparatus for power regulation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System, method, and apparatus for power regulation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System, method, and apparatus for power regulation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2923372