Induced nuclear reactions: processes – systems – and elements – Testing – sensing – measuring – or detecting a fission reactor... – Flux monitoring
Reexamination Certificate
1999-02-22
2001-01-09
Jordan, Charles T. (Department: 3641)
Induced nuclear reactions: processes, systems, and elements
Testing, sensing, measuring, or detecting a fission reactor...
Flux monitoring
C376S259000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06173026
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to nuclear reactors and more particularly, to a system for monitoring reactor instability and controlling reactor suppression.
In known types of nuclear reactors, such as boiling water reactors (BWR), the reactor core includes a plurality of fuel bundles arranged in an array capable of self-sustained nuclear fission reaction. The core is contained in a reactor pressure vessel (RPV). The typical core is submerged in a liquid such as water, which serves as both a core coolant and a neutron moderator. Each fuel assembly includes a flow channel through which water is pumped upwardly from a lower plenum to an upper plenum. A plurality of control rods containing neutron absorbing material are insertable between the fuel bundles to control the reactivity of the core. To monitor core conditions, it is common practice to distribute neutron detectors both radially and axially throughout the core. The signals from these neutron detectors are utilized to monitor the power density of the core and to initiate corrective actions, including reactor suppression, in the event of detected instability.
A nuclear reactor operates under three distinctly different stability regimes. These regimes are a stable reactor state, a reactor instability threshold state and an unstable reactor state. Reactor instability occurs when fuel cladding heat flux and channel coolant flow rates deviate from steady state conditions during power oscillations significantly above the normal neutron noise level. Reactor instability must be monitored to prevent damage to the core and to within fuel safety limits and can be accomplished by either detecting and suppressing instability induced power oscillations, or preventing them altogether.
Known “detect and suppress” systems are based on a common approach. Generally, neutron detectors, for example, local power range monitors (LPRMs), are placed within the core of the reactor. The neutron detectors generate signals indicative of reactor thermal-hydraulic oscillation frequencies. These signals are characteristic of power oscillations of the reactor. Some known “detect and suppress” systems monitor successive oscillation periods and provide a final oscillation amplitude trigger to generate a reactor trip signal. Another known system monitors of an oscillation growth rate limit and if the limit is exceeded, the system generates a reactor trip. Yet another known system compares the neutron detector signal to an amplitude trip setpoint and if the setpoint is exceeded, a reactor trip signal is generated.
Although the known systems generally provide satisfactory results, such systems permit the development of significant power oscillations prior to actuation of the suppression function. As a result, rigorous analysis of minimum critical power ratio (MCPR) performance in the presence of core power and flow oscillations is necessary to prevent exceeding the fuel safety limits or damaging the core. In particular, the transient thermal-hydraulic behavior within the limiting fuel bundle must be related to neutron flux oscillations observed by various neutron detectors.
Another shortcoming of known systems is the potential spatial effects related to the oscillation mode and its impact on the magnitude of the oscillation as observed by any given neutron detector. Combinations of neutron detector signals must be related to a reactor trip setpoint for each of the detection methods. As a result, the known systems are time consuming to determine the appropriate trip levels and allow significant power oscillations to occur prior to suppression. Additionally, current “detect and suppress” systems are still evolving since the quantification of MCPR performance as a function of power oscillation scenarios for the full spectrum of core designs and operating conditions is extremely challenging.
It would be desirable to provide a system that, prior to the development of significant power oscillations, facilitates suppression of the nuclear reactor upon reaching the threshold of reactor instability.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
These and other objects are attained by a power oscillation monitoring system which, in one embodiment, facilitates monitoring a nuclear reactor for instability and generates a thermal-hydraulic instability signal facilitating reaction suppression. The present system discriminates instability threshold conditions from stable reactor operation. Particularly, at the threshold of reactor instability, a qualitative change in the reactor core neutronic/thermal-hydraulic response occurs, and the reactor realigns into a strongly coupled configuration, resulting in an increasingly coherent response. This change affects increasingly larger regions of the core and a number density of neutron detectors located in the core reach or exceed a target successive oscillation period confirmation count. Upon the number density exceeding a defined level, an instability signal is generated by the system. By monitoring the neutron detector output signals, the system can reliably and efficiently detect the transition to a coherent core response, which is characteristic of the reactor at the threshold of instability.
In one form, the monitoring system is implemented in a computer workstation having a memory and a processor. The workstation is electrically coupled to neutron flux detectors, and a Period Based Algorithm (PBA) and a Confirmation Density Algorithm (CDA) are stored in the workstation memory. Under the control of the PBA algorithm, the system evaluates the periodicity of the neutron detector output signals to identify the presence of a density wave in the reactor. During stable reactor operation, the system occasionally generates a successive power oscillation period confirmations as a result of global perturbations to the steady state neutron flux.
The CDA utilizes the PBA output signals to identify a confirmation density, which is the fraction of active neutron detectors in the core that reach a target successive oscillation period confirmation count. When the confirmation density exceeds an instability threshold setpoint, the instability signal generated by the CDA changes from a first state to a second state. Following recognition of this condition, the system provides protection of a fuel thermal safety limit by generating the instability signal prior to any growth in power oscillation amplitude. The instability signal facilitates use of the control rods to maintain the stability of the reactor. By providing suppression at these conditions, the development of significant power oscillations is avoided.
The above described system facilitates maintaining a nuclear reactor in the stable state. The system avoids the characterization of MCPR performance as a function of growing power oscillations based on local neutron noise characteristics sensed by a few of the neutron detectors. In addition, the system eliminates the generation of spurious instability signals based on the thermal-hydraulic behavior of the reactor.
The above-described system monitors the nuclear reactor for instability and facilitates suppression of the reactor prior to development of significant power oscillations. In addition, the system does not require rigorous analysis of MCPR performance.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4770843 (1988-09-01), Taleyarkhan
patent: 5174946 (1992-12-01), Watford et al.
patent: 5225149 (1993-07-01), Banda
patent: 5481575 (1996-01-01), B{umlaut over (a)}ck et al.
patent: 5524128 (1996-06-01), Mowry et al.
patent: 5555279 (1996-09-01), Nir et al.
Mowry Christofer M.
Nir Israel
Armstrong Teasdale LLP
General Electric Company
Jordan Charles T.
Mun Kyongtaek K.
LandOfFree
System for monitoring reactor instability and controlling... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System for monitoring reactor instability and controlling..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System for monitoring reactor instability and controlling... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2497379