Induced nuclear reactions: processes – systems – and elements – Testing – sensing – measuring – or detecting a fission reactor... – Flux monitoring
Reexamination Certificate
1998-12-01
2002-01-15
Carone, Michael J. (Department: 3641)
Induced nuclear reactions: processes, systems, and elements
Testing, sensing, measuring, or detecting a fission reactor...
Flux monitoring
C376S245000, C376S215000, C376S217000, C376S255000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06339629
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system for monitoring power of a nuclear reactor and a power distribution thereof.
In particular, the present invention relates to the system for monitoring the power of the nuclear reactor, which is used for monitoring an oscillation of a power of a boiling water reactor.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A boiling water reactor (hereinafter, referred simply to as BWR) such as a light water reactor is provided with a reactor core instrumentation system having an arrangement in which multiple neutron flux detection devices, as plural neutron measuring means, is disposed in the core for detecting neutron flux so that the nuclear instrumentation system monitors power of the reactor and power distribution in axial and radius direction of the reactor core according to the detected neutron flux in an operational state of the BWR.
One neutron flux detection device is arranged in each of the 16 fuel assemblies in the reactor core of the BWR. Each neutron flux detection device has four neutron flux detectors disposed along a vertical direction thereof. Each of the neutron flux detectors are called as a local power range monitor (LPRM). For example, in a reactor core of a 1100 MWe BWR, 172 (=43×4) channel neutron flux detectors are disposed.
A power signal (LPRM signal) from each neutron flux detector is averaged every about 20 signals by an average power range monitor (APRM). For example, the 1100 Mwe BWR has 6 channels of the average power range monitors so that 6-channel APRM signals are outputted therefrom. All of these APRM and LPRM signals are analog signal.
In the conventional BWR, the APRM signal from the average power range monitor is monitored, and when the APRM signal gets to reach to no less than a predetermined value (predetermined point), a trip signal such as a scram signal is outputted so that the nuclear reactor is not prevented from operating in a dangerous state in response to the trip signal, and is stably operated.
In particular, in the conventional BWR, for avoiding an unstable phenomenon in a power of a reactor core, an operating limit range is previously set so as to avoid an operation of the nuclear reactor in the operating limit range. In a case where the reactor is operated in the operating limit range, the measures, in which a previously selected control rod is inserted so as to lower the power of the nuclear reactor whereby the operation of the nuclear reactor gets away from the operating limit range, are taken.
The operating limit range of the nuclear reactor is previously computed from a result of stability analysis using an analysis code by a process control computer. Recently, there has been developed a stability monitor which can continuously evaluate a stability of the power of the reactor core on the basis of vacillating of the signals (LPRM signals) in the reactor core detected by the neutron flux detector.
However, since the conventional stability monitor makes only an evaluation of stability with the use of the averaged APRM signal and an evaluation of individual LPRM signals, it is impossible to accurately make an evaluation of stability in a power oscillation of the nuclear reactor. The stability in the power oscillation of the nuclear reactor depends upon a complicate space dependency in the reactor core, and is recently observed in many foreign atomic power plants.
Since the APRM signal in averaged equally by each of the LPRM signals, in case where the power of the nuclear reactor oscillates in the whole of the reactor core, it is possible to detect a power distribution of the reactor core. However, in a case where the power of the nuclear reactor locally oscillates in the reactor core, or in a case where the power thereof oscillates while having a spatial phase difference in the reactor core, each of quantities of the oscillations included in each of the LPRM signals is offset so as to be absorbed in each other due to averaging the LPRM signals, thus, there is the possibility that it is difficult to detect the power distribution of the reactor core.
As an example of the oscillation of the power of the nuclear reactor at local areas in the reactor core, there is an oscillation phenomenon of a density wavy oscillation generated from fuel assemblies which are thermal-hydraulically strict and have high-power, respectively, said oscillation phenomenon being called as a channel oscillation phenomenon. Even if the oscillation phenomenon is diffused by a neutron flux oscillation, there is the possibility that the oscillation phenomenon is adapted to oscillate in a relatively only narrow range.
Further, as an example of causing the oscillation of the nuclear reactor having the spatial phase difference, there is an oscillation phenomenon which is called as a regional oscillation such that the power signals are mutually oscillated with a 180° phase difference at a symmetrical position in the reactor core. This oscillation phenomenon is actually observed in some foreign atomic power plants. For example, in a regional oscillation observed in a CAORSO plant in Italy, the largest amplitude of the APRM signal is, at most, a degree of approximately 10%; on the contrary, the largest amplitude of the LPRM signal reaches 60% is observed. This results from the following reason in which the power signals corresponding to the LPRM signals are mutually oscillated (vibrated) with a 180° phase difference at each half portion of the reactor core so that maximum values of the LPRM signals and minimum values thereof are simultaneously averaged so as to be canceled.
In a case of monitoring a stability of the reactor core, usually, a damped wave ratio indicative of stability, a cycle of the oscillation, an amplitude thereof and the like are computed from the APRM signal, whereby the stability of a state of the reactor core is estimated.
However, in the case where the regional oscillation is generated, even if the only APRM signal is monitored, there is the possibility that it is impossible to accurately detect the stability of the reactor core.
Further, in a system for monitoring a stability of a nuclear reactor, some LPRM signals at different portions in the reactor core are selected so that, by using the selected LPRM signals, the estimation operation of the stability of a state of the reactor core is carried out in the same manner as the APRM signal. However, since a logic for processing a plurality of LPRM signals and for carrying out a decision operation is not decided, the estimation operation of the system is not used for detecting the stability of the reactor core in a case where the regional oscillation is generated.
The applicants of the present invention have proposed the following methods (see the specification of U.S. Pat. No. 5,406,598 and Japanese Non-examined Patent Publication No. 6-201884) to solve the above problem that it is impossible to accurately detect the stability of the reactor core, while the regional oscillation is generated. One to a method of previously selecting reference LPRM signals on the basis of a variance value of a signal, and successively calculating phase differences and amplitude differences between the selected LPRM signals, so as to generate the neutron flux detection signal having a high sensitivity by using the phase differences and the amplitude differences of the LPRM signals as compared with averaging LPRM signals equally. The other is a method of previously estimating a spatial higher mode distribution having the possibility of oscillation, thereby, in a case of averaging the LPRM signals, using the estimated distribution mode as a weighting filter.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to overcome the foregoing problems. Accordingly, it is one object of the present invention to provided a system for monitoring power of a nuclear reactor, which can accurately monitor an oscillation of the power of the nuclear reactor by using conventional detection signals such as LPRM signals so as to improve the safety
Enomoto Mitsuhiro
Kanemoto Shigeru
Miyamoto Shiho
Takeuchi Yutaka
Carone Michael J.
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
Richardson John
LandOfFree
System for monitoring power of nuclear reactor does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System for monitoring power of nuclear reactor, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System for monitoring power of nuclear reactor will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2832685