Optics: measuring and testing – Position or displacement
Reexamination Certificate
1999-10-28
2001-09-11
Pham, Hoa Q. (Department: 2877)
Optics: measuring and testing
Position or displacement
C250S559290, C324S226000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06288785
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to systems capable of determining the spatial position and angular orientation (i.e. pose) of three-dimensional (3D) bodies or objects. More specifically, the invention relates to systems capable of tracking objects in real time within a specified volume, without regard to the objects' rigidity or visibility.
As is known in the art, a wide variety of systems have been developed that can determine the spatial position and angular orientation of objects over small time-scales, and thus track their motion in real time. These systems generally make use of specific physical phenomena, and as such, have different capabilities and limitations. One system is an optical system. Such an optical system operates on sensing of sources of radiated electromagnetic energy (e.g., light or infrared energy emitted from active markers or light or infrared energy reflected from passive markers) by sensitive arrays, such as charge coupled devices (CCD). Such optical systems can provide highly accurate spatial and angular measurements at high sampling frequencies over large operational volumes (typically room size), but require that a minimum number of the markers always be in view of the CCD sensors. This line-of-sight limitation can be partially remedied by determining the position of an obscured point from the measured positions of the visible markers with triangulation techniques. For example, markers can be affixed to instruments or probes (such as surgical probes) such that their tip points can be tracked. However, such probes must be rigid. This method cannot be applied to flexible probes such as catheters.
Another type of system is a non-optical system. Such systems include magnetic systems, mechanical systems, and ultra-sonic systems. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,197,476 and 5,295,483 to Nowacki and Horbal disclose the use of optical cameras to track the position of an ultrasonic scanner or probe, which itself detects concretions such as kidney stones within the human body. The ultrasonic scanner cannot determine the tracked object's pose, though. Magnetic systems do not suffer the line-of-sight problem inherent in optical systems; but, such systems can be severely affected by extraneous objects perturbing their magnetic fields, and are also generally less accurate. Mechanical systems use mechanical devices, such as articulating arms, and are free of line-of-sight and magnetic disturbance problems; but, such systems are considerably more expensive for a given level of accuracy. Their accuracies are subject to perturbations arising from gravitationally induced forces and torques, which limit them to the generally smaller operational volumes spanned by their range of motion. Also, they are more cumbersome than other devices since their motion is constrained by possible collisions with other objects lying within their operational volume.
As is also known in the art, optical devices can be used in conjunction with non-optical devices to overcome the optical devices' line-of-sight-limitations, but such coupling inconveniently results in the measured position data being reported in separate frames of reference, thus requiring the data to be reconciled by the user calibrating the devices to determine the necessary transformation between the two frames of reference. Birkfellner, et. al., Concepts and Results in the Development of a Hybrid Tracking System for CAS,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Medical Image Computing and Computer
-
Assisted Intervention—MICCAI'
98, Vol. 1496 (1998), pp. 342-351, describe such a system comprised of an optical tracking system and a direct current pulsed electromagnetic tracking system. They also describe procedures for calibrating and registering the magnetic system local frame of reference to the optical system frame of reference. Their system requires that the magnetic field source remain fixed after the lengthy calibration and registration procedures have been done, thus discouraging the movement of the field source to other convenient or appropriate positions as may be desired. Also, because their system reports position data from the magnetic subsystem only when the optical position data is unavailable because of obstructions in the optical system's line-of-sight, it remains essentially an optical system that is augmented by a non-optical system.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,260 to Hansen teaches a hybrid motion tracker having magnetic and optical sub-systems. This system is used for motion capture, using sensor assemblies (having both magnetic field sensors and optical Light Emitting diode (LED) sources) placed strategically on the person(s) being tracked to detect the motion. In normal operation, the optical sub-system provides the 3D position data, because of its inherently greater accuracy, and the magnetic sub-system provides the orientation data; if the optical sources are obscured, then the magnetic sub-system also provides the position data. Hansen's system is similar to the system described by Birkfellner, et. al, being primarily a coupling of a commercially available magnetic sub-system with a commercially available optical system, and using commercially available software to transform measurements between the subsystems (although some integration exists, such as using the optical sub-system to compensate the magnetic sub-system's degrading Signal-to-Noise ratio). Thus Hansen's system suffers the same deficiencies inherent in such systems, requiring fixed magnetic transmitters and fixed optical sensors whose fixed frames of reference must be first registered by the user by means of lengthy calibration and registration procedures, thereby precluding any easy repositioning of the sub-systems relative to one another as conveniently desired.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, a system is provided for determining spatial position and/or orientation of one or more objects. The system includes an optical subsystem and a non-optical subsystem. The optical subsystem includes optical subsystem light sources mounted to one or more of the objects and an optical subsystem sensor adapted to detect energy from the optical subsystem light sources. The optical subsystem has an optical subsystem coordinate system in a fixed relationship with the optical subsystem sensor. The optical subsystem sensor produces position and/or orientation signals relative to the optical subsystem coordinate system in response to optical subsystem light source detected energy. The non-optical subsystem has a non-optical coordinate system and is adapted to produce position and/or orientation signals of one or more of the objects relative to the non-optical subsystem coordinate system. A coupling arrangement is provided for producing position and/or orientation signals indicative of the position and/or orientation of the selected one of the optical or non-optical subsystems relative to the coordinate system of the other one of the optical or non-optical subsystems. A processor is responsive to signals produced by the coupling arrangement and the optical subsystem and/or non-optical subsystem for determining the position and/or orientation of one or more of the objects relative to the coordinate system of the selected one of the optical or non-optical subsystems.
In one embodiment of the invention, the coupling arrangement comprises a non-optical subsystem light source having a fixed relationship to the non-optical subsystem coordinate system. The optical subsystem sensor is adapted to detect energy from the non-optical subsystem light source and produce position and/or orientation signals in response to such non-optical subsystem light source detected energy relative to the optical subsystem coordinate system. The processor is responsive to signals produced by the optical and/or non-optical subsystems for determining the position and/or orientation of one or more of the objects relative to the optical subsystem coordinate system.
In another embodiment of the inven
Frantz Donald Dieter
Kirsch Stefan
Leis Stephen Eldon
Schilling Christian
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Northern Digital Inc.
Pham Hoa Q.
LandOfFree
System for determining spatial position and/or orientation... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System for determining spatial position and/or orientation..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System for determining spatial position and/or orientation... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2436664