System and process for remote, in situ metal work

Television – Special applications – Hazardous or inaccessible

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C318S366000, C348S081000, C348S090000, C348S143000, C700S259000, C901S042000, C901S047000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06518995

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to repair, maintenance and modifications of oil and gas field hardware, located in remote, inhospitable environment.
2. Description of Prior Art
Oil and Gas Field Production and Injection Wells:
North America has the highest concentration of active oil and gas wells in the world. They range in age from 50 years to recent. Most of these wells have low carbon steel casings and liners in them. Wear and tear—both mechanical and electrochemical (corrosion)—on the casings and liners are endemic to drilling and production operations. In most cases, casing or liner failure leads to cessation of operations at that well.
The traditional method that has been widely used for decades consists of spotting cement slurry in the defective interval and “squeezing” it through the defect to set and plug the leak. Many times it takes more than one attempt to seal the leak and can involve several days of well down time; sometimes the defect cannot be successfully repaired using this method. Moreover, casing or liner surface damage caused by post squeeze drilling and cleaning operation can set up corrosion cells and future problems. Since generally no visual evaluation of the problem is made, guess work plays a heavy role in the solution.
Another method of repair, sometimes used, consists of lining the inside of casing with liners. A special alloy liner has been used successfully in some cases and poly liners in some others. They are expensive and lack collapse strength; poly liners cause reduction of internal diameter so packers or bridge plugs cannot go through them and have low strength/bulk ratio.
Pipelines—Onshore:
There are over 170,000 miles of pipelines in U.S. alone. They require periodic maintenance to avoid long shut downs and environmental damage. The present method of repair involves digging out the buried pipe, plugging the line on both sides of the defective section, redirecting the flow through a temporary bypass, removing the damaged section, repairing and replacing the section. The process is expensive and time consuming.
Pipelines—Offshore:
Offshore pipelines are laid on the ocean floor. When a section of the line develops inevitable problem, one of the following three methods is currently used to repair it:
the defective section is raised to water surface, removed and replaced.
a diver/welder repairs the defect by under water welding.
specially manufactured mechanical connectors are used to repair the lines.
These methods are expensive and time consuming and exposes divers to risks.
Offshore Submarine Platform Structures:
The risers as well as platform structural members, such as tubular chords, braces and their weld joints require periodic inspection and maintenance. Any cracks or other defects are currently repaired by divers/welders. The process is expensive and exposes the divers to risks.
SUMMARY
In accordance with the present invention, an oil and gas field hardware repair, maintenance and modification system and process, combining principles of oil field operations, coiled tubing, robotics and video technologies, extend an operator's real time visual contact and operations control to remote and inhospitable work area, . By doing so, said system and process provide a viable, faster, safer and cost effective alternative to prevalent oil and gas field practices.
Objects and Advantages
Accordingly, besides the objects and advantages of providing a viable, faster, safer and cost effective alternative, several other objects and advantages of present invention are:
a) to provide a way for remote visual reconnaissance, diagnosis and evaluation of hardware problems;
b) to provide commensurate solution to specific local problem and to reinforce the problem area with corrosion resistant metal;
c) to provide a solution technique that is unaffected by presence of porous formations behind casings in wells;
d) to avoid drilling inside casing for cement clean up and thus avoid setting up potential corrosion cells leading to new leaks;
e) to avoid reducing casing internal diameter to a point, where it hinders subsequent use of packers and bridge plugs;
f) to reduce down time;
g) to increase probability of successful casing repair in first attempt;
h) to provide a basis for innovative preventive maintenance program;
i) to provide a cost effective alternative method to repair pipelines and offshore submarine structures.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4502407 (1985-03-01), Stevens
patent: 4508954 (1985-04-01), Kroll
patent: 4571475 (1986-02-01), Rabe
patent: 4907169 (1990-03-01), Lovoi
J. L. Saltel, et al, “In Situ Polymerization of Inflatable Composite Sleeve to Reline Damaged Tubing and Shut off Perforations”, SPE Drilling and completion, Jun. 1999, pp. 115-122, vol. 14, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas USA.
A Synopsis of Paper, SPE 38758, Economic In-Place Casing Lining and Repair, Journal of Petroleum Technology, Oct. 1997, pp. 1115-1116, vol. 49, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas USA.
Prentice Creel et al, “Gels, Monomer, Solutions Fix Pinhole Casing Leaks”, Oil and Gas Journal, Oct. 13, 1997, pp. 44-46, vol. 95, Penwell Publications, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Gabrashit S. Abdrakhmanov et al, “Isolation Profile Linear Helps Stabilize Problem Well Bores”, Oil and Gas Journal, Sep. 11, 1995, pp. 50-52, vol. 93', Penwell Publications, Tulsa, OK, USA.
M. S. McGough et al, “Visual Monitoring of Remote Welding Operations”, Welding Journal, Dec. 1990, pp. 23-28, vol. 69, Miami, Florida USA.
J. E. Agapakis, et al, Fundamentals and Advances in the Development of Remote Welding Fabrication Systems, Welding Journal Sep. 1986, pp. 21-32, vol. 65, Miami, Florida USA.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and process for remote, in situ metal work does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and process for remote, in situ metal work, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and process for remote, in situ metal work will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3171432

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.