Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer conferencing – Demand based messaging
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-17
2004-06-08
Harrell, Robert B (Department: 2142)
Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput
Computer conferencing
Demand based messaging
Reexamination Certificate
active
06748422
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to electronic mail and, more particularly, to a system and method to control sending of unsolicited electronic mail over a network.
BACKGROUND
There is no question that the explosive growth of the Internet in recent years has changed classic business and economic models. One area in which this change has been noteworthy is in the use of mass marketing by electronic mail (“e-mail”). This form of marketing has become an attractive advertising medium for businesses and other organizations because it allows them to reach large numbers of consumers at minimal cost.
Nevertheless, the use of e-mail in this manner is often problematic for the recipients of these messages. On the Internet, SPAM is the term used to describe useless or unsolicited e-mail messages. Typically, the SPAM is of narrow interest. The aspiration of the “spammer” is to make a profit, even if only a small number of recipients respond. The sending and receiving of SPAM is especially onerous for online service providers because it reduces user satisfaction in their services. SPAM also wastes network resources and people's time.
Various methods exist to filter or otherwise counter unsolicited e-mail messages. For example, filtering techniques exist to block e-mail messages received from addresses that are sources of unsolicited e-mail. One problem associated with filtering techniques, however, is that the source of the unsolicited e-mail can easily change their address to bypass the system. Another problem associated with filtering techniques is that they often filter legitimate bulk e-mail messages that could be of interest to the user. Moreover, filtering techniques are often ineffective against robotic delivery programs that send out thousands of junk e-mail messages and create nonexistent source addresses to prevent detection. The cost of monitoring robotic delivery programs is usually high.
Although functionality exists in the prior art to allow recipients to complain about unsolicited e-mail, the process can be burdensome and time-consuming for the user. In addition, to date there has been little functionality to monitor complaints against particular sources and to effectively curtail the sending of unsolicited e-mails from these sources based on this monitoring function.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system and method to control sending of unsolicited communications over a network. The system may define a SPAM inhibiting tool for users engaged in transactions over a network such as the Internet. Users of an on-line service, for example an on-line commerce service, who are interested in a non-transactional communication (e.g., a communication wherein the sending user is not engaged in a bidding transaction with a recipient user) with another user are provided with a proprietary contact form that allows them to contact other users without the sender viewing the e-mail address of the would-be recipient. This form appears only in cases where a user is contacting another and where the intended recipient is not involved in an active transaction (e.g., already bid on an item listed by the intended recipient) or a closed-successful transaction with the sender. In cases where an active transaction is involved, a seller may view all bidder e-mail addresses and bidders may view the seller's e-mail address.
In another aspect of the present invention, a network link is provided that allows recipients of forwarded messages to tag an incident as SPAM and to provide senders with feedback. For instance, users who click on the link receive a confirmation prompt advising them of the SPAM policy, what reporting of the incident means to the recipient and the sender, and the ability to classify the reason for the complaint. In a further aspect of the present invention, the system monitors the number of SPAM complaints received by a user and triggers events (e.g., inability to use the on-line services, warning flags, suspension flags, etc.) based on thresholds and displays for a user complaint level.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3573747 (1971-04-01), Adams et al.
patent: 3581072 (1971-05-01), Nymayer
patent: 4412287 (1983-10-01), Braddock, III
patent: 4674044 (1987-06-01), Kalmus et al.
patent: 4677552 (1987-06-01), Sibley, Jr.
patent: 4789928 (1988-12-01), Fujisaki
patent: 4799156 (1989-01-01), Shavit et al.
patent: 4823265 (1989-04-01), Nelson
patent: 4864516 (1989-09-01), Gathier et al.
patent: 4903201 (1990-02-01), Wagner
patent: 5063507 (1991-11-01), Lindsey et al.
patent: 5077665 (1991-12-01), Sliverman et al.
patent: 5101353 (1992-03-01), Lupien et al.
patent: 5136501 (1992-08-01), Silverman et al.
patent: 5168446 (1992-12-01), Wiseman
patent: 5205200 (1993-04-01), Wright
patent: 5243515 (1993-09-01), Lee
patent: 5258908 (1993-11-01), Hartheimer et al.
patent: 5280422 (1994-01-01), Moe et al.
patent: 5297031 (1994-03-01), Gutterman et al.
patent: 5297032 (1994-03-01), Trojan et al.
patent: 5305200 (1994-04-01), Hartheimer et al.
patent: 5325297 (1994-06-01), Bird et al.
patent: 5329589 (1994-07-01), Fraser et al.
patent: 5375055 (1994-12-01), Togher et al.
patent: 5394324 (1995-02-01), Clearwater
patent: 5426281 (1995-06-01), Abecassis
patent: 5485510 (1996-01-01), Colbert
patent: 5553145 (1996-09-01), Micali
patent: 5557728 (1996-09-01), Garrett et al.
patent: 5596994 (1997-01-01), Bro
patent: 5598557 (1997-01-01), Doner et al.
patent: 5640569 (1997-06-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5657389 (1997-08-01), Houvener
patent: 5664115 (1997-09-01), Fraser
patent: 5689652 (1997-11-01), Lupien et al.
patent: 5694546 (1997-12-01), Reisman
patent: 5706457 (1998-01-01), Dwyer et al.
patent: 5710889 (1998-01-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5715314 (1998-02-01), Payne et al.
patent: 5715402 (1998-02-01), Popolo
patent: 5717989 (1998-02-01), Tozzoli et al.
patent: 5722418 (1998-03-01), Bro
patent: 5727165 (1998-03-01), Ordish et al.
patent: 5771291 (1998-06-01), Newton et al.
patent: 5771380 (1998-06-01), Tanaka et al.
patent: 5794219 (1998-08-01), Brown
patent: 5799285 (1998-08-01), Klingman
patent: 5803500 (1998-09-01), Mossberg
patent: 5818914 (1998-10-01), Fujisaki
patent: 5826244 (1998-10-01), Huberman
patent: 5835896 (1998-11-01), Fisher et al.
patent: 5845265 (1998-12-01), Woolston
patent: 5845266 (1998-12-01), Lupien et al.
patent: 5850442 (1998-12-01), Muftic
patent: 5872848 (1999-02-01), Romney et al.
patent: 5873069 (1999-02-01), Reuhl et al.
patent: 5884056 (1999-03-01), Steele
patent: 5890138 (1999-03-01), Godin et al.
patent: 5905974 (1999-05-01), Fraser et al.
patent: 5905975 (1999-05-01), Aussubel
patent: 5922074 (1999-07-01), Richard et al.
patent: 5924072 (1999-07-01), Havens
patent: 5926794 (1999-07-01), Fethe
patent: 5974412 (1999-10-01), Hazlehurst et al.
patent: 5991739 (1999-11-01), Cupps et al.
patent: 6035402 (2000-03-01), Vaeth et al.
patent: 6044363 (2000-03-01), Mori et al.
patent: 6055518 (2000-04-01), Franklin et al.
patent: 6058417 (2000-05-01), Hess et al.
patent: 6073117 (2000-06-01), Oyanagi et al.
patent: 6085176 (2000-07-01), Woolston
patent: 6104815 (2000-08-01), Alcorn et al.
patent: 6202051 (2001-03-01), Woolston
patent: 6230188 (2001-05-01), Marcus
patent: 2253543 (1997-03-01), None
patent: 2658635 (1991-02-01), None
patent: 9300266 (1993-02-01), None
patent: WO 92/15174 (1992-02-01), None
patent: WO95/17711 (1995-06-01), None
patent: WO 96/34356 (1996-04-01), None
patent: WO 97/37315 (1997-03-01), None
patent: WO99/63461 (1999-12-01), None
Malone, T.W.; Yates, J; et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”,Communication—of the ACM, Jun. 1987, pp. 484-497, vol. 30, No. 6.
Warbelow, A; Kokuryo, J, “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System”.Harvard Business School Case/Study, Jul. 1989, pp. 1-15, HBVR# 9-190-001, USA.
“Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”,IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1995, pp. 83-84, vol. 38, No. 1.
NEO, B.S, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore”,Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Dec. 1992,
Holmquest Hilary
Morin Noel
eBay Inc.
Harrell Robert B
LandOfFree
System and method to control sending of unsolicited... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System and method to control sending of unsolicited..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method to control sending of unsolicited... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3346852