System and method of exploiting prosodic features for dialog...

Data processing: speech signal processing – linguistics – language – Speech signal processing – For storage or transmission

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C704S230000, C704S240000, C704S255000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07996214

ABSTRACT:
Disclosed are a system and method for exploiting information in an utterance for dialog act tagging. An exemplary method includes receiving a user utterance, computing at periodic intervals at least one parameter in the user utterance, quantizing the at least one parameter at each periodic interval, approximating conditional probabilities using an n-gram over a sliding window over the periodic intervals and tagging the utterance as a dialog act based on the approximated conditional probabilities.

REFERENCES:
patent: 7265691 (2007-09-01), Tomic
patent: 7529667 (2009-05-01), Gorin et al.
patent: 7542903 (2009-06-01), Azara et al.
patent: 7716056 (2010-05-01), Weng et al.
patent: 7783473 (2010-08-01), Bangalore et al.
patent: 7853451 (2010-12-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 2006/0129393 (2006-06-01), Oh et al.
patent: 2007/0033004 (2007-02-01), Bangalore et al.
patent: 2008/0162111 (2008-07-01), Bangalore et al.
patent: 2008/0162117 (2008-07-01), Bangalore et al.
patent: 2010/0082326 (2010-04-01), Bangalore et al.
patent: 2010/0131260 (2010-05-01), Bangalore et al.
Rangarajan et al., “Acoustic-Syntactic Maximum Entropy Model for Automatic Prosody Labeling”, IEEE Spoken Lanugage Technology Workshop, Dec. 10-13, 2006, pp. 74 to 77.
Venkataraman et al., “Training a prosody-based dialog act tagger from unlabeled data”, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. ICASSP '03, vol. 1, pp. 1-272 to 1-275.
Stolcke et al., “Dialogue Act Modeling for Automatic Tagging and Recognition of Conversational Speech”, 2000, Computational Linguistics, vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 340 to 373.
Zimmerman et al., “A based joint segmentation and classification of dialog acts in multiparty meetings”, 2005 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Nov. 27, 2005, pp. 215 to 219.
Yoshimura et al., “Pitch pattern clustering of user utterances in human-machine dialog”, Proc. Of IC-SLP, vol. 2, pp. 837-840, 1996.
Mast et al., “Dialog act classification with the help of prosody”, in Proceedings of ICSLP, pp. 1732-1735, 1996.
Ries, K., “IMM and neural network based speech act detention”, in Proc. Of ICASSP, vol. 1, pp. 497-500, Mar. 1999.
Stolcke, et al. “Dialog act modeling for conversational speech,” inApplying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing. Papers from the 1998 AAAI Spring Symposium. Technical Report SS-98-01(J. Chu-Carroll and N. Green, eds.), (Stanford, CA), pp. 98-105, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, Mar. 1998.
Jurafsky, et al., “Automatic detection of discourse structure for speech recognition and understanding,” inProceedings of ASRU, (Santa Barbara, CA), pp. 88-95, Dec. 1997.
Shriberg, et al., “Can prosody aid the automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech?,”Language and Speech, vol. 41, No. 3-4, pp. 439-487, 1998.
Jurafsky, et al. “Lexical, prosodic, and syntactic cues for dialog acts,” inProc. ACL/COLING Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, (Montreal, Canada), pp. 114-120, Aug. 1998.
Venkataraman, et al. “Automatic dialog act labeling with minimal supervision,” inProc. 9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, (Melbourne), Dec. 2002.
Black et al., “Predicting the intonation of discourse segments from examples in dialogue speech,” inProceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, May 1995.
Taylor et al., “Intonation and dialogue context as constraints for speech recognition,”Language and Speech, vol. 41, No. 34, pp. 493-12, 2000.
Lavie, et al., “Dialogue processing in a conversational speech translation system,” inProc. Of ICSLP, pp. 554-557, Oct 1996.
Reithinger et al., “Predicting dialogue acts for a speech-to-speech translation system,” inProc. of ICSLP, vol. 2, pp. 654-657, Oct 1996.
Fernandez et al., “Dialog act classification from prosodic features using support vector machines,” inProceedings of Speech Prosody, pp. 291-294, 2002.
Mrozinski, et al., “Automatic sentence segmentation of speech for automatic summarization,” inProceedings of ICASSP. May 14-19, 2006.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method of exploiting prosodic features for dialog... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method of exploiting prosodic features for dialog..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method of exploiting prosodic features for dialog... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2760525

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.