System and method of assortment, space, and price...

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Operations research or analysis

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S007370

Reexamination Certificate

active

08032406

ABSTRACT:
A computer-implemented method involves modeling of product decisions in a retail store. The product decision variables are profit, assortment, placement, promotion, and inventory. Various rules and constraints such as facing elasticity, shelf replenishment costs, shelf space, carrying costs, facing capacity, slotting fees, and cannibalization are defined for multiple product decision variables. An objective function utilizes the rules and constraints for the multiple product decision variables. The objective function model is resolved by uses nested loops to solve for a first variable, and then using the first variable to solve for a second variable. Each decision variable in the objective function is controllable by externally determined multipliers. The objective function simultaneously models each of the multiple product decision variables by iteratively resolving the objective function into values which optimize sales, revenue, and profit for the retail store. The model is output in graphic format.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5953707 (1999-09-01), Huang et al.
patent: 6078900 (2000-06-01), Ettl et al.
patent: 6308162 (2001-10-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6341269 (2002-01-01), Dulaney et al.
patent: 7092896 (2006-08-01), Delurgio et al.
patent: 7379890 (2008-05-01), Myr et al.
patent: 7451065 (2008-11-01), Pednault et al.
patent: 2002/0035537 (2002-03-01), Waller et al.
patent: 2002/0072956 (2002-06-01), Willems et al.
patent: 2002/0169657 (2002-11-01), Singh et al.
patent: 2003/0055710 (2003-03-01), Burk et al.
patent: 2003/0069780 (2003-04-01), Hailwood et al.
patent: 2003/0200129 (2003-10-01), Klaubauf et al.
patent: 2004/0064351 (2004-04-01), Mikurak
patent: 2004/0236639 (2004-11-01), Candadai et al.
patent: 2005/0044274 (2005-02-01), Deming et al.
patent: 2006/0149634 (2006-07-01), Pelegrin et al.
patent: 2007/0208608 (2007-09-01), Amerasinghe et al.
Alain Bultez et al (“Asymmetric Cannibalism in Retail Assortments,” Journal of Retailing, Summer 1989).
Borin, Norm et al, “Category management models: Where do we go from here?” American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings. Chicago: 2002. vol. 13 p. 151.
Fred S. Zufryden. “A Dynamic Programming Approach for Product Selection and Supermarket Shelf-Space Allocation” The Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 37, No. 4 (Apr. 1986), pp. 413-422.
Alain Bultez et al (“Asymmetric Cannibalism in Retail Assortments,” Journal of Retailing, Summer 1989).
Borin et al. “A model for dtermining retail product category assortment and shelf space allocation”., Decision Science 25 (1994) 359.
Desmet et al., “Estimation of product category sales responsiveness to allocated shelf space”., International Journal of Research in Marketing 15 (1998); pp. 443-457.
Borin et al., “A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf space allocation”., Decision Science 25 (1994) 359.
Corstjens et al., “A model for optimizing retail space allocation”., Management Science, vol. 27, No. 7; Jul. 1981, pp. 822-833.
Urban, Timothy L. “An inventory—Theoretic Approach to product assortment and shelf-space allocation”., Journal of Retaining, 74:1 (1998); pp. 15-35.
Bultez et al., “Asymmetric cannibalism in retail assortments” Journal of Retailing: Summer 1989; 65, 2; pp. 153-192.
Irion et al., A piecewise Linearization framework for retail shelf space management model. Technical report, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB—FILE/2004/10/967.pdf.
“Non-Final Office Action” mailed Jun. 10, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/468,266, entitled “System and Method of Modeling and Optimizing Product Parameters from Hierarchical Structure”, filed Aug. 29, 2006, 18pgs.
“Final Office Action” mailed Dec. 20, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/468,266, entitled “System and Method of Modeling and Optimizing Product Parameters from Hierarchical Structure”, filed Aug. 29, 2006, 18pgs.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method of assortment, space, and price... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method of assortment, space, and price..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method of assortment, space, and price... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4281255

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.