Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Computer graphic processing system – Plural graphics processors
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-23
2003-11-11
Bella, Matthew C. (Department: 2676)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Computer graphic processing system
Plural graphics processors
C345S505000, C712S016000, C712S040000, C713S400000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06646645
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a system and method for synchronization of video display outputs from multiple PC graphics subsystems. More specifically, a system and method for synchronization of video raster display outputs from multiple PC graphics subsystems to facilitate synchronized output onto multiple displays are disclosed.
2. Description of Related Art
Recent advances in commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) graphics technology have brought low cost, high performance two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) graphics subsystems into the personal computer (PC) marketplace. As a result, COTS graphics technology is increasingly used in the professional market to replace very expensive custom hardware. However, such graphics subsystems typically do not have methods for synchronizing raster outputs to allow synchronized output onto multiple displays.
FIG. 1
is a block diagram illustration an exemplary conventional PC graphics subsystem
20
that can be utilized for 2D, windowed 2D, and/or 3D imagery. The PC graphics subsystem
20
typically includes a graphics processor
22
interfacing with a PC motherboard
26
containing a host processor
24
via a host interface
28
such as a personal computer bus, e.g., peripheral component interconnection (PCI) or a video card, e.g., accelerated graphics port (AGP). The graphics processor
22
also interfaces with a reference clock
30
, a memory
32
, and a video connector
34
. The video connector
34
generally includes a red, green and blue (RGB) analog video interface
36
, a horizontal and vertical sync (VSYNC, HSYNC) interface
38
where the syncs may be composite or encoded into the green output, and/or a Digital Visual Interface (DVI)
40
for serial bit stream format. DVI is described in, for example, “Digital Visual Interface, Revision 1.0”, Digital Display Working Group, Apr. 2, 1999. The video timing typically conforms to the VESA standard. VESA is described in, for example, “VESA Video Signal Standard (VSIS),” Version 1, Rev. 1.0, Video Electronics Standards Association, Nov. 5, 1997. However, it is noted various other suitable standards are often available and may be utilized.
The timing of the video raster is defined by the vertical and horizontal syncs derived from an internal dot clock, i.e., a clock running at pixel rate or a multiple thereof. The internal dot clock is generally derived from a reference oscillator circuit running at a particular frequency, typically 14.318 MHz. It is noted that although any other suitable frequency may be used, the 14.318 MHz frequency is often used on PC graphics subsystems as crystal oscillators as this frequency is readily available.
In a multiple display system, multiple PC graphics subsystems may be housed in one chassis or PC or in multiple chassis or PCs with each chassis or PC housing one or more PC graphics subsystems. Because each graphics processor is running off of its own reference oscillator or clock, if each graphics processor is set up to have the same video format, i.e., horizontal and vertical rates, the raster output from each graphics processor will drift with respect to the raster outputs from the other graphics processors over time. Such drift is caused by the frequency output tolerance of the oscillator producing a dynamic phase drift in the relative graphics processor sync outputs. The phase difference and phase drifting result in a number of adverse side effects such as inter-monitor interference, image tearing in real time rendering, performance degradation in real time rendering and/or problems when overlaying or mixing of outputs. Each of these side effects is described in more detail below.
Inter-monitor interference often results when outputs from multiple PC graphics subsystem are connected to monitors that are in close vicinity to each other such that the monitors' magnetic coils interfere with each other. Inter-monitor interference is generally not noticeable when each monitor is displaying a raster at the same frequency and phase. However, when a phase shift exists between two adjacent monitors, a visible inter-monitor interference will often be present, manifesting itself as a vertically moving pattern. Phase drift causes the vertically moving pattern to scan the image up or down at a frequency equal to the difference between the vertical raster frequency of one monitor and that of the other monitor. The rate of movement can be a number of raster lines per second. The vertically moving pattern often manifests itself as a horizontal shift or image darkening/lightening of a number of lines.
Image tearing in real time rendering is another side effect resulting from the phase difference and phase drifting described above. In particular, when a PC graphics subsystem is used for real time (often 3D) imagery, each new image is rendered into an invisible buffer while the current image remains fixed in the visible buffer. When the rendering of the current image is complete, a buffer swap occurs on the next vertical retrace where the invisible buffer is rendered visible and the visible buffer becomes invisible. The display is thus updated every frame or every integer number of frames. When the outputs from multiple PC graphics subsystems are employed to present a wider field of view of the imagery, the rasters should be aligned to prevent image tearing at the join between the monitors. If the rasters are not aligned, one monitor could be scanning the previous image while an adjacent monitor is scanning the latest. Thus, any rendered moving object that spans the two adjacent monitors may appear disjointed or torn because the moving object appears to be in different positions on the respective displays.
Frame rate performance degradation in real time rendering is yet another side effect resulting from the phase difference and phase drifting described above. In systems with multiple PC graphics subsystems that are buffer swap synchronized but do not have rasters synchronized, frame rate performance can suffer and become erratic. The poor and/or erratic frame rate performance is caused by the dependency of the channels to be synchronized at the point of issuing the buffer swap command and the fact that the buffer swap command is not actually executed until the following video vertical blanking period that occurs at any time between 0 and the video refresh period. During the video refresh period, no rendering occurs as the buffer that is to be rendered is still being used for display output. Thus, the frame rate may suffer by up to one video refresh period.
As an example, a system with a 60 Hz video refresh rate is loaded such that rendering takes less than {fraction (1/60)} of a second. When the video outputs are in phase, i.e., the rasters are synchronized, the optimum 60 Hz performance is achieved. In contrast, when the video outputs are out of phase, i.e., the rasters are not synchronized, performance will often drop to 30 Hz as the video outputs will tend to move in and out of phase with each other over time. As the animation rate changes from 30 Hz to 60 Hz and back again, jerks and glitches will typically be very noticeable on the video output.
The final side effect noted above resulting from the phase difference and phase drifting is overlaying or mixing of outputs. When outputs from multiple PC graphics subsystems are mixed and the rasters are not synchronized, large FIFOs would be required to pixel-align the imagery prior to the mixing of outputs. In addition, if the buffer swaps are not synchronized, image tearing as described above will also appear.
Moreover, even if phase drifting were not present, i.e. if the PC graphics subsystems were outputting the raster at the same frequency, the phases of each of the PC graphics subsystems would need to be aligned within a line or so to guarantee that all of the above adverse side effects are not apparent to the end user.
Thus, what is needed is a system and method for synchronization of video raster display outputs from multiple PC gra
Simmonds Alan C.
Slade Paul M.
Bella Matthew C.
Kuo Jung-hua
Monestime Mackly
Quantum3D, Inc.
LandOfFree
System and method for synchronization of video display... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System and method for synchronization of video display..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for synchronization of video display... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3147129