Data processing: presentation processing of document – operator i – Presentation processing of document – Annotation control
Reexamination Certificate
2011-03-08
2011-03-08
Hutton, Doug (Department: 2176)
Data processing: presentation processing of document, operator i
Presentation processing of document
Annotation control
C715S751000, C717S100000, C717S101000, C705S300000, C705S301000, C707S608000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07904802
ABSTRACT:
A method and system for efficient code review performed during the software development. The method and system include storing information about a plurality of authors and reviewers; detecting code to be reviewed by analyzing a code repository with respect to recent code modifications; creating a code review invitation according to the stored information about a plurality of authors and reviewers; distributing the code review invitation to a respective reviewer; recording comments for review code from the respective reviewer; measuring coverage of the reviewed code; applying metrics to the code review invitations and the comments; measuring code review characteristics based on the applied metrics.
REFERENCES:
patent: 7386831 (2008-06-01), Flanagan
patent: 7596778 (2009-09-01), Kolawa et al.
patent: 2001/0010329 (2001-08-01), Ohashi
patent: 2003/0131313 (2003-07-01), Flanagan
patent: 2004/0085354 (2004-05-01), Massand
patent: 2005/0050521 (2005-03-01), Chang
patent: 2005/0114841 (2005-05-01), Moskowitz et al.
patent: 2005/0120127 (2005-06-01), Bradley et al.
patent: 2005/0188214 (2005-08-01), Worley et al.
patent: 2006/0026502 (2006-02-01), Dutta
patent: 2006/0059453 (2006-03-01), Kuck et al.
patent: 2007/0011659 (2007-01-01), Venolia
patent: 2008/0034275 (2008-02-01), Edd et al.
patent: 2009/0044178 (2009-02-01), Aridor et al.
patent: 2010/0144380 (2010-06-01), Washburn
Johnson, Philip, “An Instrumented Approach to Improving Software Quality through Formal Technical Review”, 1994, pp. 113-122.
Johnson, Philip and Danu Tjahjono, “Improving Software Quality through Computer Supported Collaborative Review”, 1993, pp. 61-76.
Augustin, Larry, et al. “Accellerating Software Development through Collaboration”, May 19-25, 2002, pp. 559-563.
Baker, Richard, “Code Reviews Enhance Software Quality”, pp. 570-571, 1997.
John Gintell, John Arnold, Michael Houde, Jacek Kruszelnicki, Roland McKenney and Gérard Memmi; “Scrutiny: A collaborative inspection and review system”; Software Engineering—ESEC '93; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993, vol. 717/1993, 344-360.
Kolawa Adam K.
Kucharski Marek
Christie, Parker & Hales, LLP
Hutton Doug
Parasoft Corporation
Smith Benjamin J
LandOfFree
System and method for software code review does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System and method for software code review, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for software code review will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2624785