Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Finance
Reexamination Certificate
2000-08-15
2003-11-11
Millin, Vincent (Department: 3624)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Finance
C705S039000, C705S044000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06647376
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system and method for Point-Of-Sale (POS) check authorization. In addition, this system and method provides a merchant, who accepts a check as payment for goods and services, up-to-date customer demand deposit account (DDA) information to assist him in making the decision whether or not to accept the check.
2. Description of the Related Art
Checks have maintained a relatively constant volume for completing point of sale transactions. However, competing forms of payment, such as credit cards and debit (ATM) cards have siphoned off some of the most credit-worthy customers. Because of this development, the check writing population includes a higher percentage of less credit-worthy customers, making checks increasingly risky for merchants to accept. Consequently, check nonpayment, namely, when a legitimate check is drawn on an account that does not contain sufficient funds, has become more common. Losses related to nonpayment are projected to reach $95 Billion by the year 2005. Also of concern is check fraud, that is, when a check is altered, counterfeited, forged, or drawn on a closed account. Losses to financial institutions relating to check fraud have been estimated to be as high as $1.34 Billion. Merchants, rather than financial institutions, absorb the majority, well over 90%, of such losses.
Systems currently exist that provide some security for merchants wishing to accept checks as payment. For example, service providers such as Equifax, Telecheck and NPC maintain databases of customer and account information and offer check authorization services. Two general types of services are offered. These are check verification and check guarantee.
With a check verification service, when a merchant receives a check, he passes it through a check reader that transmits identifying information to the company providing verification services. The company uses a variety of tools to evaluate the risk of accepting the check and then transmits an accept or deny decision back to the merchant at the point of sale. The merchant still must make the decision whether or not he will accept the check. If a check is subsequently returned, the merchant can either try to collect it himself, or engage the collection arm of the verification company, generally for an additional fee. Such verification companies generally charge between $0.02 and $0.20 per check, or a flat monthly fee, for verification services. Verification is typically used by merchants with a high volume of low valued checks, such as grocery stores.
With a check guarantee service, as with check verification, the merchant passes the consumer's check through a reader that transmits identifying information to the guarantee firm. Again, the firm evaluates the risk of the check and then transmits an accept or deny decision back to the merchant at the point of sale. However, with check guarantee, if an approved check is subsequently returned, the guarantee firm must reimburse the merchant for the full amount of the check. The guarantee firm would then take over responsibility for collection. The fee for guarantee services is typically 0.4% to 5% of the check's value. Guarantee services are usually used by merchants who receive a low volume of high value checks, such as jewelry stores.
Merchants authorize checks using magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) reading devices linked to POS systems. Authorization is made over communication networks by the service provider vetting check information against experiential data bases.
FIG. 12
shows the steps necessary to complete an authorized check transaction using prior art check authorization techniques.
As shown there, the transaction is initiated by a tender of the check at the point of sale. The authorization request consists of capturing the data on the check and sending the transaction request to the service provider, or acquirer. In making the authorization decision, the service provider vets the check information using resident databases and approves or declines the check. The decision is transmitted to the merchant. Thereafter, the transaction is completed after the merchant allows the purchase if the check is approved. Settlement is achieved by the merchant delivering the check to his bank. His bank processes the check in the normal manner, eventually presenting the check to the payor bank for payment. If the check is not good, and a check guarantee service was used by the merchant, the merchant delivers the dishonored check to the service provider.
Check authorization service providers make use of a multiplicity of information sources in making the authorization decision. Positive file databases are proprietary experiential databases that keep records of accounts that have passed good checks in the past. The databases are built through the experience gained by authorizers as they verify or guarantee the checks of their client base. As a result, the greater the volume of checks processed, the stronger the experiential database is likely to be.
Negative file databases are proprietary experiential databases of known “bad check” offenders. Like the positive file databases, negative files are built through the experience gained by authorizers as they verify or guarantee the checks of their client base. Again, the greater the volume of checks processed, the stronger the experiential database is likely to be.
DDA status information is used to a limited extent by some check authorization service providers. This information is stored in databases external to the service providers and is maintained and updated by participating financial institutions. The positive files indicate which accounts may present problems by tagging them with cautionary codes, such as closed, closed-for-cause, NSF (non-sufficient funds), new account, and the like. However, the current services offered by providers possess limited DDA population coverage and incomplete information. Since only banks can access DDA information in real-time, the DDA information in the possession of authorization providers may not be up to date.
Check authorization service providers also use risk management systems and proprietary risk assessment tools developed internally by such firms. These are used to assess the risk of a given transaction based upon numerous variables including the results returned by negative file, positive file, and DDA status databases.
Systems have been proposed that eliminate the need for checks altogether. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,802 (Ohmae et al.) describes a central processing system having stored data relating to accounts of users. The purchase is approved or disapproved on the basis of the information stored on the computer, and the account is debited taking into account a period of indulgence from the date of the transaction.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,988 (Hills et al.) is directed to a point-of-sale system that reads customer information, for example from the customer's check, credit card or through manual input, and subsequently, by means of an automated clearing house (ACH) network transaction, debits the customer's account for the amount of the goods and services provided and credits the merchant's account for the same amount. The system includes hardware to read customer information to verify that the customer has an appropriate balance to conduct the transaction from a central computer system holding information relating to various customers' credit-worthiness. The transaction information is stored at the central computer for subsequent reconciliation via the ACH network, if the transaction is approved.
The systems discussed above have several drawbacks. First, those that rely on information stored in central databases by their very nature do not provide access to up-to-the-minute status regarding the customer's account. A merchant who relies on such a system runs the risk that the customer, while generally credit-worthy, currently has insufficient funds in his account.
Moreover
Farrar Henry C.
Hicks John H.
Fitzpatrick ,Cella, Harper & Scinto
Kyle Charles R.
Millin Vincent
LandOfFree
System and method for point-of-sale check authorization does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System and method for point-of-sale check authorization, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for point-of-sale check authorization will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3131003