System and method for performing web based in-view monitoring

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07970647

ABSTRACT:
Methods and apparatuses for performing dynamic Web-based market analysis are disclosed. A Web server presents a Web page including content to a user, via a browser located at the user's computer or workstation. The content in the Web page may be provided by third party entities that pay predetermined fees to have the Web server render their content in a Web page. While the user views the site, detailed user activities associated with the content, including in-view activities associated with viewable content in the Web page, are collected in a client side data store. After a trigger event occurs, such as the client side data store fills up, the collected data is sent back to the Web server where its is stored in a server side data store. An analytical program executed by the Web server retrieves the collected response data from the data store and performs market analysis on the collected response data. The analytical program produces results associated with the effectiveness of the content included the Web page. A middleware program, executing in the Web server, retrieves the result data and produces billing records, that may also include content effectiveness reports, and sends the billing records to respective third party entities that supplied the content for billing and marketing purposes.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4775935 (1988-10-01), Yourick
patent: 4870579 (1989-09-01), Hey
patent: 4992940 (1991-02-01), Dworkin
patent: 4996642 (1991-02-01), Hey
patent: 5091852 (1992-02-01), Tsuchida et al.
patent: 5201010 (1993-04-01), Deaton et al.
patent: 5311424 (1994-05-01), Mukherjee et al.
patent: 5353219 (1994-10-01), Mueller et al.
patent: 5383111 (1995-01-01), Homma et al.
patent: 5459306 (1995-10-01), Stein et al.
patent: 5515269 (1996-05-01), Willis et al.
patent: 5583763 (1996-12-01), Atcheson et al.
patent: 5668987 (1997-09-01), Schneider
patent: 5704017 (1997-12-01), Heckerman et al.
patent: 5724521 (1998-03-01), Dedrick
patent: 5749081 (1998-05-01), Whiteis
patent: 5768142 (1998-06-01), Jacobs
patent: 5774868 (1998-06-01), Cragun et al.
patent: 5790426 (1998-08-01), Robinson
patent: 5794209 (1998-08-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 5825651 (1998-10-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 5835087 (1998-11-01), Herz et al.
patent: 5842199 (1998-11-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5867799 (1999-02-01), Lang et al.
patent: 5872850 (1999-02-01), Klein et al.
patent: 5878384 (1999-03-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5884282 (1999-03-01), Robinson
patent: 5893909 (1999-04-01), Nomura et al.
patent: 5918014 (1999-06-01), Robinson
patent: 5933811 (1999-08-01), Angles et al.
patent: 5948061 (1999-09-01), Merriman et al.
patent: 5949419 (1999-09-01), Domine et al.
patent: 5974396 (1999-10-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 6006218 (1999-12-01), Breese et al.
patent: 6006225 (1999-12-01), Bowman et al.
patent: 6016475 (2000-01-01), Miller et al.
patent: 6018738 (2000-01-01), Breese et al.
patent: 6018748 (2000-01-01), Smith
patent: 6038598 (2000-03-01), Danneels
patent: 6041311 (2000-03-01), Chislenko et al.
patent: 6049777 (2000-04-01), Sheena et al.
patent: 6064980 (2000-05-01), Jacobi et al.
patent: 6085229 (2000-07-01), Newman et al.
patent: 6092049 (2000-07-01), Chislenko et al.
patent: 6108493 (2000-08-01), Miller et al.
patent: 6108637 (2000-08-01), Blumenau
patent: 6112186 (2000-08-01), Bergh et al.
patent: 6119101 (2000-09-01), Peckover
patent: 6226656 (2001-05-01), Zawadzki et al.
patent: 6266649 (2001-07-01), Linden et al.
patent: 6285987 (2001-09-01), Roth et al.
patent: 6286043 (2001-09-01), Cuomo et al.
patent: 6317722 (2001-11-01), Jacobi et al.
patent: 6317782 (2001-11-01), Himmel et al.
patent: 6321179 (2001-11-01), Glance et al.
patent: 6321221 (2001-11-01), Bieganski
patent: 6334127 (2001-12-01), Bieganski et al.
patent: 6356889 (2002-03-01), Lohman et al.
patent: 6401075 (2002-06-01), Mason et al.
patent: 6412012 (2002-06-01), Bieganski et al.
patent: 6415368 (2002-07-01), Glance et al.
patent: 6438579 (2002-08-01), Hosken
patent: 6442529 (2002-08-01), Krishan et al.
patent: 6460036 (2002-10-01), Herz
patent: 6643696 (2003-11-01), Davis et al.
patent: 2002/0010757 (2002-01-01), Granik et al.
patent: 2002/0019774 (2002-02-01), Kanter
patent: 2002/0032608 (2002-03-01), Kanter
patent: 0 265 083 (1988-04-01), None
patent: 0 643 359 (1995-03-01), None
patent: 0 751 471 (1997-01-01), None
patent: 0 827 063 (1998-03-01), None
patent: 2 336 925 (1999-11-01), None
patent: 1-169605 (1989-07-01), None
patent: WO 97/26729 (1997-07-01), None
patent: WO 98/02835 (1998-01-01), None
patent: WO 98/33135 (1998-07-01), None
patent: WO 99/13423 (1999-03-01), None
patent: WO 00/68851 (2000-11-01), None
Appeal 2008-3794, Ex parte Arthur Koeppel and Jonathan Turner, Decided Nov. 24, 2008, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Decision in U.S. Appl. No. 09/660,495, (14 pages).
Aronson, Brad and Zeff, Robbin, “Advertising on the Internet,” Online, http://library.books24x7.com, visited May 16, 2002, Copyright 1999, Chapters 3 and 6.
Matthias Jarke et al., “Query Optimization in Database Systems,” Computing Surveys, vol. 16, No. 2, Jun. 1984, pp. 111-152.
Gerard Salton et al., “Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 24, No. 5, Jan. 1988, pp. 513-523.
John A. Swets, “Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems,” Articles, Science, vol. 240, Jun. 3, 1988, pp. 1285-1293.
Nicholas J. Belkin et al., “Information Filtering and Information Retrieval: Two Sides of the Same Coin?,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, No. 12, Dec. 1992, pp. 29-38.
Earl Cox, “How a Machine Reasons: Part 8,” Al Expert, vol. 8, No. 3, Mar. 1993, pp. 13-14.
David A. Maltz, “Distributing Information for Collaborative Filtering on a Usenet Net News,” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1994, pp. 1-78.
Pattie Maes, “Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, No. 7, Jul. 1994, pp. 31-40 and 146.
M.W. Berry et al., “Using Linear Algebra for Intelligent Information Retrieval,” Department of Computer Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, Information Science Research Group, Bellcore, Morristown, NJ, Dec. 1994, pp. 1-24.
Paul Resnick et al., “GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews,” CSCW, 1994, pp. 175-186.
Upendra Shardanand et al., “Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating ‘Word of Mouth’,” Chi '95 Conference Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 7-11, 1995, pp. 210-217.
Pat Langley et al., Applications of Machine Learning and Rule Induction,: Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, No. 11, Nov. 1995, pp. 54-64.
Curtis H.K. Tsang et al., “An Object Oriented Intelligent Tourist Advisor System,” Proc. 1996 Australian New Zealand Conf. on Intelligent Information Systems, Adelaide, Australia, Nov. 18-20, 1996), pp. 1-4.
Net Perceptions, Inc., White Paper, “Building Customer Loyalty and High-Yield Relationships Through GroupLens™,” http://www.netperceptions.com/whitepaper.html, (Visited Nov. 22, 1996), pp. 1-9.
Paul Resnick et al., “Recommender Systems,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 56-58.
Loren Terveen et al., “Phoaks: A System for Sharing Recommendations,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 59-62.
Henry Kautz et al., “Referral Web: Combing Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 63-65.
Mark Balabanović et al., “Fab: Content-Based, Collaborative Recommendation,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 66-72.
James Rucker et al., “Siteseer: Personalized Navigation for the Web,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 73-76.
Joseph A. Konstan et al., “GroupLens: Applying Collaborative Filtering to U

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method for performing web based in-view monitoring does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method for performing web based in-view monitoring, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for performing web based in-view monitoring will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2714064

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.