System and method for improved synchronization between a...

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer conferencing – Demand based messaging

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C379S088220, C707S793000, C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07899872

ABSTRACT:
A system and method for improved client and server communications, more particularly, an improved protocol that may be used for communication between a client and a server, such as in an email environment. Many features are provided for improved communications. An email server may provide the best message body available for an email message, may transfer an entire data object if requested property or properties are not well defined within the data object, may provide progress data for use in tracking download progress, and may send error information for a data object having an error. Email changes may be optimized at an email server component, even if the email changes occurred at another email server component. An email server may maintain a table of changes that occur to folders at an associated data store, and may notify a subscribed email client component of changes that occur in the table.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5537551 (1996-07-01), Denenberg et al.
patent: 5694561 (1997-12-01), Malamud et al.
patent: 5923846 (1999-07-01), Gage et al.
patent: 6073137 (2000-06-01), Brown et al.
patent: 6134582 (2000-10-01), Kennedy
patent: 6151643 (2000-11-01), Cheng et al.
patent: 6167402 (2000-12-01), Yeager
patent: 6233318 (2001-05-01), Picard et al.
patent: 6324544 (2001-11-01), Alam et al.
patent: 6324587 (2001-11-01), Trenbeath et al.
patent: 6377978 (2002-04-01), Nguyen
patent: 6449634 (2002-09-01), Capiel
patent: 6529685 (2003-03-01), Ottesen et al.
patent: 6629130 (2003-09-01), Mertama et al.
patent: 6639687 (2003-10-01), Neilsen
patent: 6684088 (2004-01-01), Halahmi
patent: 6868143 (2005-03-01), Menon et al.
patent: 6917965 (2005-07-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 6934734 (2005-08-01), Lakhdhir
patent: 7043548 (2006-05-01), Bouet
patent: 7366760 (2008-04-01), Warren et al.
patent: 7386590 (2008-06-01), Warren et al.
patent: 2001/0005864 (2001-06-01), Mousseau et al.
patent: 2001/0054115 (2001-12-01), Ferguson et al.
patent: 2002/0010746 (2002-01-01), Jilk, Jr. et al.
patent: 2002/0093923 (2002-07-01), Bouet
patent: 2002/0138581 (2002-09-01), MacIntosh et al.
patent: 2002/0140989 (2002-10-01), Shinchi et al.
patent: 2002/0184224 (2002-12-01), Haff et al.
patent: 2002/0188683 (2002-12-01), Lytle et al.
patent: 2002/0188689 (2002-12-01), Chung
patent: 2003/0177171 (2003-09-01), Brown et al.
patent: 2003/0229644 (2003-12-01), Natarajan et al.
patent: 2003/0231207 (2003-12-01), Huang
patent: 2004/0068544 (2004-04-01), Malik et al.
patent: 2008/0126496 (2008-05-01), Warren et al.
patent: 2329891 (2002-06-01), None
patent: 0 924 921 (1999-06-01), None
patent: 0 981 231 (2000-02-01), None
patent: 1 178 661 (2002-02-01), None
patent: 1291770 (2003-03-01), None
patent: 63-205747 (1988-08-01), None
patent: 10-243461 (1998-09-01), None
patent: 11-68987 (1999-03-01), None
patent: 2000-215122 (2000-08-01), None
patent: 2001-197247 (2001-07-01), None
patent: 2001-339422 (2001-12-01), None
patent: 2002-517947 (2002-06-01), None
patent: 2002-208959 (2002-07-01), None
patent: 2002-359649 (2002-12-01), None
patent: 2 095 857 (1997-11-01), None
patent: WO 93/25962 (1993-12-01), None
patent: 9413086 (1994-06-01), None
patent: WO 99/57619 (1999-11-01), None
patent: WO 00/11585 (2000-03-01), None
patent: 0057612 (2000-09-01), None
patent: WO 01/27774 (2001-04-01), None
patent: 0178319 (2001-10-01), None
patent: 0221749 (2002-03-01), None
patent: WO 02/28038 (2002-04-01), None
patent: WO 02/084520 (2002-10-01), None
Nieplocha et al., “Armci: A Portable Remote Memory Copy Library for Distributed Array Libraries and Compiler Run-Time Systems,” pp. 533-546, Apr. 1999.
Satyanarayanan et al., “In the RPC2 Reference Guide and Manual,” Chapter 4, pp. 37-62, Carnegie Mellon University, May 2002, USA.
Bisdikian, “Performance Analysis of Single-Stage, Output Buffer Packet Switches with Independent Batch Arrivals,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 627-652, 1995.
Crispin, “Internet Message Acess Protocol,” Version 4, Rev 1, pp. 1-71, Dec. 1996.
Myers et al., “Post Office Protocol,” Version 3, pp. 1-23, May 1996.
European Search Report, Apr. 2004.
“imapd.dist.in” Double Precision, Inc., 6 pages (Jun. 12, 2002).
Birrell et al., “Implementing Remote Procedure Calls,”ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 39-59 (Feb. 1984).
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/367,161.
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/367,273.
Goldsmith et al., “A Mail-Safe Transformation Format of Unicode,” pp. 1-14 (May 1997).
Honeycutt, “Using the Internet,” 3 pages (1997) (with English Translation).
Melnikov, “Synchronization Operations for Disconnected IMAP4 Clients,” 20 pages (Aug. 2002).
Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/673,273.
Office Action mailed Apr. 20, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,972.
Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/367,161.
Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/367,273.
Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/367,161.
Office Action mailed Oct. 27, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,972.
Srinivasan, “RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2,” 19 pages (Aug. 1995).
Sioda, Shinji, “Learning Protocols and Formats (Tenth Installment), MIME for Exchanging Information Other Than Characters by Using Email,” Nikkei Internet Technology, No. 25, pp. 130-140, Jul. 22, 1999.
European Examination Report dated Dec. 30, 2008 in 03029810.3-1238.
Response to the European Examination Report in 03029810.3-1238, Apr. 27, 2009.
Response to the Chinese Second Office Action in 200310123925.7, Oct. 21, 2008.
Chinese Second Office Action in 200310123925.7, Jun. 6, 2008.
Chinese First Office Action in 20030123925.7, Nov. 16, 2007.
Japanese First Office Action in 2004-000704, Jul. 10, 2009.
Japanese Second Office Action in 2004-000704, Jan. 15, 2010.
Japanese Final Office Action in 2004-000704, May 25, 2010.
Japanese Decision to Decline Amendment in 2004-000704, May 25, 2010.
Polish First Office Action in 364200/DP, Nov. 23, 2009.
Polish Second Office Action in 364200/DP, Apr. 14, 2010.
Malaysian Office Action in PI 20034774, Aug. 3, 2007.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method for improved synchronization between a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method for improved synchronization between a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for improved synchronization between a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2718307

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.