Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive
Reexamination Certificate
2005-07-05
2005-07-05
Hafiz, Tariq R. (Department: 3623)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Discount or incentive
C705S007380
Reexamination Certificate
active
06915269
ABSTRACT:
Techniques for evaluating the closeness of fit between various parties and counterparties utilizing bilateral and multilateral decision-making are disclosed. For each party, questions intended to reveal the preferences of the party are presented to the party and/or a co-evaluator for the party, and a preference profile is derived for the party based upon the responses to the questions. For each counterparty, questions intended to reveal the preferences of the counterparty are presented to the counterparty and/or a co-evaluator for the counterparty, and a preference profile is derived for the counterparty. The preference profiles of the parties and counterparties are analyzed to determine, for each potential pairing of party and counterparty, those providing a relatively close fit.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5072385 (1991-12-01), Rebeillard et al.
patent: 5124911 (1992-06-01), Sack
patent: 5884270 (1999-03-01), Walker et al.
patent: 5978768 (1999-11-01), McGovern et al.
patent: 6272467 (2001-08-01), Durand et al.
patent: 6289340 (2001-09-01), Puram et al.
Singh, Man Jit and Sam Kingsley. “Matching Candidates with Job Openings Using Web-based Adaptive Conjoint Analysis”. Sawtooth Software, Inc. Conference. Feb. 2-5, 1999, San Diego, CA.
CarreerMosaic.com from web.archive.org “Wayback Machine”. pp. 1-16, Archived Apr. 27, 1997.
www.onlineinsight.com/precision.solutions/choice.shtml “Precision Choice, the Ideal “Salesperson” Brought to the Internet,” 3 pages.
Philippe Cattin & Dick R. Wittink, “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 46 (Summer 1982), pp. 44-53.
http://www.uni-mainz.debohlp/cld.html “The Conjoint Literature Database,” 33 pages.
http://mijuno.larc.nasa.gov/dfc/ppt/cja.html “Conjoint Analysis from the Perspective of Competitive Advantage” by Edwin B. Dean, 2 pages.
http://mijuno.larc.nasa.gov/dfc/ppt/cjaB.html “Conjoint Analysis Bibliography,” 2 pages.
http://dssresearch.com/library/conjoint/conjoint.htm “A Review of Conjoint Analysis,” 8 pages.
http://www.marketstrategies.com/itmethod/conjoint/htm “Conjoint Analysis,” 2 pages.
http://www.marketstrategies.com/itmethod/conjoint.htm “Hypothetical Scenario,” 3 pages.
Dick R. Wittink & Philippe Cattin, “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 53 (Jul. 1989), pp. 91-96.
http://www.surveysite.com/docs/conjoint-intropage.html and www.surveysite.com/tutorconjoint4.html, “Conjoint Analysis” and “Conjoint Analysis Tutorial,” 8 pages total.
http://library.northernlight.com/AC19980501080019698.html?cb=O&sc=O#doc “How to redesign your organization to match customer needs” by Ken Toombs and George Bailey, from Planning Review, Mar. 4, 1995, 5 pages.
http://library.northernlight.com/ZZ19980114050097922.html?cb=O&sc=O#doc “Perfect union” by Steven H. Cohen from Markering Research, Spring 1997, 7 pages.
http:/www.prometrics.com/REFERENC/CONJOINT.html “ProMetrics; Our Services; Conjoint Analysis,” 2 pages.
“Modeling Preference in Conjoint Measurement” by Paul F. Hase; presented at the Sawtooth Software Conference: “Doing What We Couldn't Do Before,” Jan. 28-30, 1991, Sun Valley, Idaho, pp. 207-224.
http://www.cnjnt.futurestep.com/cgi-bin-us/acqnet.pl “Desired Job Characteristics,” 9 pages.
http://www.laicompaass.com/hub.asp7candidateid=643741429, “LAI Compass; Analysis (Personal Style, Typical Activity, Activity Appeal Preferred Culture),” 27 pages.
www.themeetingpoint.com “The Meeting Point,” 1 page.
http://hotbot.lycos.com/?MT=dating+service+statistical&SQ=1&TR=25688&BT=Search results for “dating service statistical,” 1 page.
Q.E.D. Software, Inc., “Choice AnalysisSMSimulation Model—User's Guide,” Version 2.1, Dec., 1999.
“Conjoint Analysis,” published by Hase/Schannen Research Associates, Inc., 231 Clarksville Rd., P.O. Box 2061, Princeton, New Jersey; believed to be from presentations dating from the late 1980's and 1990's, 8 pages.
“Conjoint (Tradeoff) Analysis: Why We Use It, How It Works, and How The Results Can Be Analyzed,” published by Hase/Schannen Research Associates, Inc., of Princeton, New Jersey, 38 pages.
“Choice AnalysisSM—A Method for Optimizing Strategies and for Identifying New Product Opportunities,” published by Hase/Schannen Research Associates, Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey, 23 pages.
“New Techniques for Measuring Consumers' Judgments of Products and Services” by Paul E. Green aned Yoram Wind, a Working Paper from Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Sep., 1974, 31 pages.
“New Way to Measure Consumers' Judgments” by Paul E. Green and Yoram Wind, Harvard Business Review, Jul., 1975.
Gralle, Pl, “How E-Mail Works,” How the Internet Works, Ziff-Davis Press, 1996, pp. 44-49.
Mintz Steven J.
Shapiro Eileen C.
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP
DecisionSorter LLC
Hafiz Tariq R.
Stimpak Johnna
LandOfFree
System and method for facilitating bilateral and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System and method for facilitating bilateral and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for facilitating bilateral and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3374560