System and method for evaluating information aggregates by...

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S793000, C706S050000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07065532

ABSTRACT:
System and method for evaluating an information aggregate by analyzing categories into which each document of the aggregate is placed. A metrics database stores for each document indicia including associated categories. A query engine is responsive to a user request and the metrics database for aggregating documents having same, unique attributes in an information aggregate and identifying categories associated with documents comprising the information aggregate; and a visualization engine visualizes the category or set of categories, such as by list or distribution frequency, and changes in time over conceptual or physical space.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4908761 (1990-03-01), Tai
patent: 5371673 (1994-12-01), Fan
patent: 5745113 (1998-04-01), Jordan et al.
patent: 5933818 (1999-08-01), Kasravi et al.
patent: 6006223 (1999-12-01), Agrawa et al.
patent: 6018734 (2000-01-01), Zhang et al.
patent: 6070143 (2000-05-01), Barney et al.
patent: 6112201 (2000-08-01), Wical
patent: 6115709 (2000-09-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6115718 (2000-09-01), Huberman et al.
patent: 6138128 (2000-10-01), Perkowitz et al.
patent: 6148294 (2000-11-01), Beyda et al.
patent: 6154739 (2000-11-01), Wrobel
patent: 6177932 (2001-01-01), Galdes et al.
patent: 6182067 (2001-01-01), Presnell et al.
patent: 6195657 (2001-02-01), Rucker et al.
patent: 6199067 (2001-03-01), Geller
patent: 6212494 (2001-04-01), Boguraev
patent: 6216098 (2001-04-01), Clancy et al.
patent: 6233583 (2001-05-01), Hoth
patent: 6249779 (2001-06-01), Hitt
patent: 6266649 (2001-07-01), Linden et al.
patent: 6275820 (2001-08-01), Navin-Chandra et al.
patent: 6297824 (2001-10-01), Hearst et al.
patent: 6334127 (2001-12-01), Bieganski et al.
patent: 6363174 (2002-03-01), Lu
patent: 6460034 (2002-10-01), Wical
patent: 6499034 (2002-12-01), Mackinlay
patent: 6553359 (2003-04-01), Schwenkreis
patent: 6640229 (2003-10-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6711522 (2004-03-01), Shirai et al.
patent: 6728695 (2004-04-01), Pathria et al.
patent: 6728702 (2004-04-01), Subramaniam et al.
patent: 6763354 (2004-07-01), Hosken
patent: 6826572 (2004-11-01), Colace et al.
patent: 6826575 (2004-11-01), Waclawski
patent: 2002/0035593 (2002-03-01), Salim et al.
patent: 2002/0099679 (2002-07-01), Usitalo et al.
patent: 2002/0138590 (2002-09-01), Beams et al.
patent: 2003/0028564 (2003-02-01), Sanfilippo
patent: 2003/0120974 (2003-06-01), Adams et al.
patent: 2003/0126136 (2003-07-01), Omoigui
patent: 2003/0154196 (2003-08-01), Goodwin et al.
patent: 2003/0172357 (2003-09-01), Kao et al.
patent: 2003/0212490 (2003-11-01), Mitchell et al.
patent: 2004/0049514 (2004-03-01), Burkov
patent: 2004/0078750 (2004-04-01), Frank
patent: 2004/0186824 (2004-09-01), Delic et al.
patent: 2004/0220894 (2004-11-01), Soluk et al.
patent: 2005/0004823 (2005-01-01), Hnatio
patent: 2005/0004891 (2005-01-01), Mahoney et al.
patent: 2005/0165766 (2005-07-01), Szabo
patent: 1401181 (2004-03-01), None
patent: 2366877 (2002-03-01), None
patent: 2001119403 (2001-04-01), None
patent: WO 97/38378 (1997-10-01), None
patent: WO 0137162 (2001-05-01), None
patent: WO0201455 (2002-02-01), None
patent: WO 2005008536 (2005-01-01), None
Jonathon D Levy, “measuring and maximizing results through elearning”,Oct. 2001, 7 pages.
Sushmita Mitra et al “data mining in soft computing framework: a survey”, IEEE transactions on neural networks, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 3-14.
Michele Lanza et al. “understanding software envolution using a flexible query engine”, submitted ito the formal foundatins of software evolution workshop of CSMR 2001, pp. 1-5.
William W Cohen et al. “a comparision of string distrance metrics for name-matching asks”, 2003 american association for artificial intelligence, 6 pages.
Chaomei chen et al. “visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure”, IEEE Mar. 2001, pp. 65-71.
Alea M Fairchild, “Knowledge management metrics via balanced scorecard methodology”, proceedings of the 35th annual hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2002 IEEE, , 8 pages.
Andreas Henrich et al. “applying the IRstram retrieval engine for structured documents to INEX”, no date, 6 pages.
Sara Irina Fabrikant, “dealing with the distance-similarity metaphor for knowledge discovery and visualization of very large databases”, white paper: ucgis kddlgeovis workshop, reston, va, Nov. 2003 pp. 1-3.
Dave mattox et al. “enterprise expert and knowledge discovery”,proceedings of 8th international conference on Human computer ineraction and special session on intelligent tutoring and learning environments, vol. 2, Aug. 1999, pp. 1-11.
R.Mack et al. “Knowledge portals and the emerging digital knowlede workplace”,IBM systems Journal, vol. 40, No. 4, 2001, pp. 925-955.
Xavier Polanco et al. “Information visualization”, State of the art part C: WP9, EICSTES Project-IST-1999, Jan. 2002, 69 pages.
Todd peachey et al. “Knowledge management and the leading IS Journals: An analysis of trends and gaps in published research”, IEEE 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International conference on system sciences-2005, pp. 1-10.
Giordano Adami et al. “Bootstrapping for hierarchical document classification”, proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information and knowledge management, Knowledge manaement session 4, 2003, pp. 295-302.
Yihwa I.Liou “Knowledge acquisition: issues, techniques and methodology”, ACM SIGMIS database, vol. 23, issue 1, 1992, pp. 59-64.
Brouillette, S. M. and J. P. Lavelle.A Methodology for Mapping and Analyzing Community Social Services as a System.Norcross, 6th Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings. Miami Beach, May 17-18, 1997. Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA, 1997. 662-667.
Sack, W.Diagrams of Social Cohesion. Association for Computational Linguistics, U of Maryland. MIT Media Laboratory, Jun. 1999. 3 plus 8 pages.
Kautz, H., B. Selman, M. Shah..Referral Web: Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 1997, 1-4 pages.
Schwartz, M. F., D. C. M. Wood.Discovering shared interests using graph analysis. Communications of the ACM, v. 36 n. Aug. 8, 1993. 78-89.
Wellman, B.For a social network analysis of computer networks: a sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community. Proceedings of the 1996 conference on ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS. 1-11.
Qureshi, S.Supporting electronic groupprocesses: a social perspective. Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Supporting teams, groups, and learning inside the IS function. ACM Press. 24-34.
Ackerman, M.S., B. Starr.Social activity indicators: interface components for CSCW systems. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on User Interface and Software Technology. ACM Press. 159-168.
Garton, L., C. Haythornthwaite, B. Wellman.Studying on-line social networksin Doing Internet Research, edited by Steve Jones, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999, Chapter 4 pp. 75-105.
Srivastava, Jaidepp, Robert Cooley, Mukund Deshpande, Pang-Ning Tan.Web Usage Mining: Discovery and Applications of Usage Patterns from Web Data. SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 1, Issue 2. Jan. 2000. 12-23.
Wang, Y.Web Mining and Knowledge Discovery of Usage Patterns. CS748T Project (Part I) Feb. 2000, 25 pages.
Sack, W.Conversation Map: a content-based Usenet newsgroup browser. Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM Press. 233-240.
Kaugers, K.Integrated multi scale text retrieval visualization. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Proceedings o fthe Conference on CHI 98 Summary: Human Factors in Computing Systems, ISBN: 1-58113-028-7 ACM Digital Library, 1998. 307-308.
Feldman, R.Mining unstructured data. Tutorial notes for ACK SIGKDD 1999. ACM Press. 182-236.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method for evaluating information aggregates by... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method for evaluating information aggregates by..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for evaluating information aggregates by... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3693334

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.