System and method for direct transmitter self-calibration

Details System and method for direct transmitter self-calibration System and method for direct transmitter self-calibration

2002-10-11

2004-08-03

Vo, Don N (Department: 2631)

Pulse or digital communications

Transmitters

Antinoise or distortion

Reexamination Certificate

active

06771709

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The instant invention relates to calibration of quadrature (I/Q) modulators, and in particular to self-calibration of a direct transmitter used in digital communication system, as well as in radar and instrumentation fields.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Digital communication techniques are by now the emerging standard in almost all areas of telecommunication. Digital communication is often based on a special class of communication signals, sent by a transmitter and received by a receiver, using digital modulation techniques. These techniques make use of a class of signal modulators, which perform vector or quadrature modulation. A vector-modulated or quadrature-modulated signal is an amplitude and phase modulated signal that is modulated according to in-phase and quadrature phase components, which define a phase vector. In vector or quadrature modulation, two modulation input signals independently modulate the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components of a carrier signal. For proper operation, the I and Q channels of the modulator are ideally calibrated to be equal in gain, i.e. balanced, and 90° apart, i.e. in quadrature.
It is known that gain and phase imbalance between the I and Q channels in a vector or quadrature modulator degrade the overall communication link performance. Although compensation within a quadrature receiver for eliminating the performance degradation due to the phase imbalance is effective, the degradation due to the gain imbalance is not to be eliminated at the receiver in a straightforward manner. In addition, any DC offsets possibly cause a local oscillator (LO) signal to leak through the vector modulator, the LO being part of the vector modulator. In many cases, vector modulators designed to be fed I- and Q-signals with a given DC offset, for example 0.5 V. After fabrication of the vector modulator, the optimal DC offset optionally takes on values that are different from the designed values. For example, the optimal DC offset for the I-channel is 0.48V, whereas the optimal offset for the Q-channel is 0.52 V. Therefore, the expression “correcting for DC offset” has to be understood as “compensation for deviation from an optimal DC offset”.
The leakage as well as the gain and phase imbalance distort the transmitted signal, and make it difficult to meet a given spectrum mask requirement. Therefore, it is desirable to eliminate or minimize imbalances and deviations from optimum offsets at the transmitter. Preferably, a calibration process is used to achieve this task.
Given the importance of digital communication in today's media world, a plethora of studies have been devoted to estimating and correcting for errors in vector modulators, and improving performance of direct transmitters. Therefore, the instant invention will be better understood and highly appreciated, when viewed in the context of relevant prior art.
Tuthill and Cantoni (1999 IEEE Int'l Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. III, pp. 1621-1624) describe a method for compensation of the imperfections of reconstruction filters only. The proposed methodology is to adaptively control the digital channel filters to compensate for the reconstruction filter imperfections, such as departure from linear phase and from constant amplitude response, as well as gain and phase imbalance between I and Q filters. However, this methodology does not address the vector modulator imperfections.
Leyonhjelm and Faulkner (IEEE Trans. on Vehicular. Technology, Vol 44, No. 1, February 1995, pp. 95-102) address the use of a direct modulator for multiple channels. The phase and gain imbalances in transmit I and Q channels exhibit a frequency dependency, and thus require adjustment. The proposed technique is to add to each channel a lower side band (LSB) signal that will destructively add with the one generated. However, a channel has to be free, when the LSB signal to be inserted is determined, a frequency down conversion of the transmitted signal is also necessary.
Hilborn, Stapleton, and Cavers (IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol 43, No. 2, May 1994, pp. 223-233) propose a technique to compensate for both the quadrature modulator imperfections and the nonlinearities in power amplifiers. The technique to derive both quadrature modulator pre-distortion coefficients and amplifier linearizer coefficients is based on measuring the signal power in a channel adjacent to the desired one. It is shown that the power in the adjacent signal is approximately a quadratic function of the modulator and amplifier distortions. However, a pre-selection filter is needed at the output port to reject the transmitted signal and to look at an adjacent channel only. The technique works only when modulator and amplifier imperfections are small so that certain underlying approximations remain valid.
Cavers and Liao (IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 42, No. 4, November 1993, pp. 581-588.) propose a technique to compensate for direct modulator imperfections. A power detector is used to sample a modulator output signal, and by feeding the modulator with a known sequence of signals, coefficients for DC offset and gain and phase imbalance compensation are derived. This sequential technique adjusts first the DC offset and then the gain and phase imbalances. A series of tones with four different phases is used to derive the required gain and phase imbalance adjustment factors. A least-mean-square technique is used to average the coefficients obtained from several measurements, and to converge to a steady state. The adaptation and calibration is performed during non-transmission periods of time. In addition, the DC offset coefficients are calibrated by grounding the inputs of the vector modulator. In this case, measuring the output power of the modulator with a power detector is difficult, and the accuracy of the results is a function of sensitivity of a power detector and a dynamic range of a feedback system. Disadvantageously, it is necessary to make measurements with no signal fed to the vector modulator and thus requires a feedback loop (i.e. power detector and analog-to-digital converter) with high dynamic range operating during non-transmission periods of time.
Cavers and Liao (Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 19-22, 1991, pp. 578-583) propose a technique to be used at the receiver to compensate for both transmitter and receiver imperfections. A three-tap equalizer is used at the receiver in either a decision directed mode or reference aided mode. Although the authors claim that all the modulator imperfections are compensated, a modulator gain imbalance likely results in a signal-to-noise ratio degradation that is not likely recovered at the receiver. In addition, transmitter DC offset losses translate into local oscillator LO leakage which consumes transmit power inefficiently as opposed to power used for transmission of the desired signal. The quadrature signals are possibly recovered at the receiver even in the presence of modulator imperfections at a cost of a likely performance loss.
Cavers (IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 46, No. 3, August 1997, pp. 707-716) also derives pre-distortion coefficients from a solution of a set of linear equations. This technique is iterative, and usually uses two or more iterations to result in reasonable performance. The approximations made in solving the linear equations are only valid when errors are small. Further, the technique is computationally costly, and matrices are not likely to be well conditioned. Thus, a matrix inversion algorithm necessary is likely to be non trivial.
Ren and Wolff (1997 IEEE-MTT-S proceeding, Jun. 8-13, 1997, vol. 111, pp. 1691-1694) describe a technique to determine pre-distortion coefficients. The technique relies on demodulating the modulator's output signal and building a database of correction factors for each potential I and Q signal to be transmitted. However, this method relies on a transmitter signal demodulated in a feedback loop.
Yang, Vos and Cho (Proc. of IEEE Vehic

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

System and method for direct transmitter self-calibration does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method for direct transmitter self-calibration, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for direct transmitter self-calibration will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3339574