System and method for determining the desirability of video...

Interactive video distribution systems – Operator interface – To facilitate tuning or selection of video signal

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C725S042000, C725S032000, C725S035000, C725S037000, C725S044000, C725S045000, C709S217000, C709S218000, C709S219000, C711S129000, C711S133000, C711S134000, C711S135000, C711S136000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06973665

ABSTRACT:
The desirability of programming events may be determined using metadata for programming events that includes goodness of fit scores associated with categories of a classification hierarchy one or more of descriptive data and keyword data. The programming events are ranked in accordance with the viewing preferences of viewers as expressed in one or more viewer profiles. The viewer profiles may each include preference scores associated with categories of the classification hierarchy and may also include one or more keywords. Ranking is performed through category matching and keyword matching using the contents of the metadata and the viewer profiles. The viewer profile keywords may be qualified keywords that are associated with specific categories of the classification hierarchy. The ranking may be performed such that qualified keyword matches generally rank higher than keyword matches, and keyword matches generally rank higher than category matches. In alternative embodiments, scores may be calculated such that the ranges of scores for qualified keyword matches, keyword matches and category matches are overlapping but are generally ordered as previously described. Related embodiments may pertain to systems that implement such methods. Program rankings may be used to generate an alert schedule for providing alerts to viewers regarding programming events.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4908707 (1990-03-01), Kinghorn
patent: 4996642 (1991-02-01), Hey
patent: 5223924 (1993-06-01), Strubbe
patent: 5390027 (1995-02-01), Henmi et al.
patent: 5410344 (1995-04-01), Graves et al.
patent: 5434678 (1995-07-01), Abecassis
patent: 5444499 (1995-08-01), Saitoh
patent: 5534911 (1996-07-01), Levitan
patent: 5552833 (1996-09-01), Henmi et al.
patent: 5585865 (1996-12-01), Amano et al.
patent: 5619247 (1997-04-01), Russo
patent: 5737734 (1998-04-01), Schultz
patent: 5758259 (1998-05-01), Lawler
patent: 5767893 (1998-06-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5801747 (1998-09-01), Bedard
patent: 5845279 (1998-12-01), Garofalakis et al.
patent: 5848396 (1998-12-01), Gerace
patent: 5872588 (1999-02-01), Aras et al.
patent: 5878222 (1999-03-01), Harrison
patent: 5924090 (1999-07-01), Krellenstein
patent: 5943670 (1999-08-01), Prager
patent: 5945988 (1999-08-01), Williams et al.
patent: 5973683 (1999-10-01), Cragun et al.
patent: 6003027 (1999-12-01), Prager
patent: 6005631 (1999-12-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 6011895 (2000-01-01), Abecassis
patent: 6029176 (2000-02-01), Cannon
patent: 6088717 (2000-07-01), Reed et al.
patent: 6088722 (2000-07-01), Herz et al.
patent: 6133912 (2000-10-01), Montero
patent: 6138147 (2000-10-01), Weaver et al.
patent: 6144964 (2000-11-01), Breese et al.
patent: 6157413 (2000-12-01), Hanafee et al.
patent: 6177931 (2001-01-01), Alexander et al.
patent: 6178419 (2001-01-01), Legh-Smith et al.
patent: 6208988 (2001-03-01), Schultz
patent: 6236395 (2001-05-01), Sezan et al.
patent: 6240421 (2001-05-01), Stolarz
patent: 6295092 (2001-09-01), Hullinger et al.
patent: 6298344 (2001-10-01), Inaba et al.
patent: 6311194 (2001-10-01), Sheth et al.
patent: 6327590 (2001-12-01), Chidlovskii et al.
patent: 6338043 (2002-01-01), Miller
patent: 6353929 (2002-03-01), Houston
patent: 6388715 (2002-05-01), Eggen et al.
patent: 6389467 (2002-05-01), Eyal
patent: 6411992 (2002-06-01), Srinivasan et al.
patent: 6425128 (2002-07-01), Krapf et al.
patent: 6457010 (2002-09-01), Eldering et al.
patent: 6460034 (2002-10-01), Wical
patent: 6463428 (2002-10-01), Lee et al.
patent: 6463585 (2002-10-01), Hendricks et al.
patent: 6546388 (2003-04-01), Edlund et al.
patent: 6560678 (2003-05-01), Weissman et al.
patent: 6567980 (2003-05-01), Jain et al.
patent: 6614987 (2003-09-01), Ismail et al.
patent: 6637029 (2003-10-01), Maissel et al.
patent: 2002/0095676 (2002-07-01), Knee et al.
patent: 2002/0120925 (2002-08-01), Logan
patent: 0774868 (1997-05-01), None
patent: 2000175141 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 99/29108 (1999-06-01), None
patent: WO 01/7359 (2001-10-01), None
European Search Report dated Apr. 7, 2005—European Application No.: 02791233.6.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method for determining the desirability of video... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method for determining the desirability of video..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for determining the desirability of video... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3490391

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.