System and method for automated resource reduction analysis

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S002000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10042415

ABSTRACT:
A system and method that analyzes employee data and assists management with surplus determinations is used for automated resource reduction analysis. Areas within the organization are identified that include surplus resources. These areas are further identified to determine which skill groups have surplus skills. Skill groups can be broken down by level. A determination is made as to what decreases are desired for the identified skill groups and levels. Employees within the identified skill groups and levels are evaluated using common evaluation templates that set forth the expected skills employees should have for a given skill group and level. The evaluated employee records are sorted by the evaluations to determine the spectrum of skills within a particular skill group and level. The desired reduction percentage is then applied to the sorted records to identify surplus employees. These identified surplus employees are then reviewed using organizational surplus guidelines and applicable laws.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5909669 (1999-06-01), Havens
patent: 5926794 (1999-07-01), Fethe
patent: 6119097 (2000-09-01), Ibarra
patent: 6275812 (2001-08-01), Haq et al.
patent: 6524109 (2003-02-01), Lacy et al.
patent: 6618734 (2003-09-01), Williams et al.
patent: 6853975 (2005-02-01), Dirksen et al.
patent: 2002/0143496 (2002-10-01), Mactas et al.
patent: 2002/0184085 (2002-12-01), Lindia et al.
patent: 2002/0198766 (2002-12-01), Magrino et al.
patent: 2003/0004789 (2003-01-01), Calderaro et al.
patent: 2003/0004790 (2003-01-01), Calderaro et al.
patent: 2003/0120537 (2003-06-01), Desanti et al.
patent: WO 9526535 (1995-10-01), None
“Reduction in grade and removal based on unacceptable performance”, 5 CFR Part 431, Feb. 23, 1987.
“National Institute of Standards and Technology”, Alternative Personnel Management System, Federal Register, Oct. 21, 1997, v62, n203.
“Department of the Navy, Human Resources Implementation Guide” by Betty Welch, Department of the Navy Performance Management Programs, Oct. 1, 1997.
US Office of Personnel Management, Restructuring Information Handbook, Module 3, Reduction in Force, Jun. 1998 version.
“Are you really managing your corporate resources?” by Robert Skinner, Management Accounting, v80, n2, Aug. 1998.
“IT confidential” by John Soat, InformationWeek, Jul. 9, 2001.
“How to set up a Reduction in Force Program” by Knapp, Journal of Organizational Excellence, Autumn 2001.
“Overhaul of state civil service system is sent to Gov. Bush” by Dara Kam, South Florida Sun-Sentinel, May 5, 2001.
“India: HM's VRS targets 6 pc reduction in workforce”, Businessline, Jun. 8, 2001.
“Corporate Downsizing: The Effect of Implementation strategies on Firm Performance” by Robert Nixon, Doctor of Philosophy thesis at Texas A&M University, Dec. 1995.
DeWitt “The Structural Consequences of Downsizing”, Feb. 1993, Organization Science vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 30-40.
Steven et al “Strategic Downsizing, 1995”, 1999, Management Decision v37n7, pp. 1-30 Dialog file 15, Accession No. 02495035.
Davidson “Early Retirement Programs and Firm Performance”, Dec. 1996, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 970-984.
Band et al “Strategic downsizing” 1995, Management Decision v33n8 pp. 36-45, Dialog file 15, Accession No. 01095379.
Band et al., Strategic Downsizing, Management Decision, vol. 33, No. 8, 1995, pp. 36-45.
Applebaum et al., Strategic Downsizing: Critical Success Factors, Management Decision, vol. 37, No. 7, 1999, p. 535.
ANPAS System (11 pages), www.webarchive.org, Apr. 2001.
Blackwell, “Job performance would decide raise,” Richmond Times-Dispatch, May 7, 1997.
Campbell et al., “Self appraisal in performance evaluation: development versus evaluation,” The Academy of Management Review, Apr. 1998.
Aram et al., “An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict,” The Academy of Management Review, Apr. 1981.
Lam et al., “Total quality management and performance appraisal: an experimental study of process versus results and group versus individual approaches,” Jour. of Org. Behavior, Apr. 1999.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method for automated resource reduction analysis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method for automated resource reduction analysis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for automated resource reduction analysis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3791832

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.