System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Finance

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S014270, C705S038000, C705S026640, C705S03600T, C283S067000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07467111

ABSTRACT:
The present invention implements an auction in which multiple types of goods may be auctioned in a dynamic process. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is a system and method for a computer implemented dynamic multi-unit auction in which the price paid or received by bidders tends to be independent of their own bids, in which participants may be provided with information concerning their competitors' bids as the auction progresses, and in which the confidentiality of high values may be maintained. Participants' quantities bid at a given time may be restricted to be less than or equal to the quantities bid at an earlier time. These features provide the advantage of improving economic efficiency of the auction design over the prior art.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3581072 (1971-05-01), Nymeyer
patent: 4789928 (1988-12-01), Fujisaki
patent: 5077665 (1991-12-01), Silverman et al.
patent: 5136501 (1992-08-01), Silverman et al.
patent: 5235680 (1993-08-01), Bijnagte
patent: 5283731 (1994-02-01), Lalonde et al.
patent: 5394324 (1995-02-01), Clearwater
patent: 5664115 (1997-09-01), Fraser
patent: 5689652 (1997-11-01), Lupien et al.
patent: 5727165 (1998-03-01), Ordish et al.
patent: 5835896 (1998-11-01), Fisher et al.
patent: 6047264 (2000-04-01), Fisher et al.
patent: 6243691 (2001-06-01), Fisher et al.
patent: 6272473 (2001-08-01), Sandholm
patent: 6415270 (2002-07-01), Rackson et al.
patent: 6449601 (2002-09-01), Friedland et al.
patent: 2001/0027431 (2001-10-01), Rupp et al.
patent: 2002/0026400 (2002-02-01), Narayan et al.
patent: 2005/0187859 (2005-08-01), Growney et al.
Martin Bichler (“An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions”; Department of Information Systems, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Augasse 2-6, A-1090 Austria; Decision Support Systems 29 (2000) 249-268; Accepted Apr. 3, 2000).
Bronfman et al. “An experimental examination of the Walrasian tatonnement mechanish” Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 27, No. 4 (winter 1996), pp. 681-699.
Rothkopf et al. “Computationally Managable Combinational Auctions”, Management Science, vol. 44, No. 8 (Aug. 1998) pp. 1131-1147.
L. M. Ausubel, “An Efficient Ascending-Bid Auction for Multiple Objects,” Working Paper 97-06, University of Maryland, Jun. 1997.
Charles River Associates and Market Design Inc., “Auction Design Enhancements for Non-Combinatorial Auctions,” Report to the Federal Communications Commission, Sep. 1997.
P. Cramton, A. Parece and R. Wilson, (Cramton 1) “Auction Design for Standard Offer Service,” mimeo, Charles River Associates and Market Design Inc., Sep. 1997.
P. Cramton, A. Parece and R. Wilson, (Cramton 2) “Rules for Standard Offer Service Auction,” mimeo, Charles River Associates and Market Design Inc., Aug. 1997.
Federal Communications Commission, “Bidder Information Package for FCC Entrepreneurs' Auction of Broadband PCS Basic Trading Area Licenses, Frequency Block C, Scheduled for Aug. 2, 1995,” pp. 1-108.
K. A. McCabe, S. J. Rassenti and V. L. Smith, “Auction Institutional Design: Theory and Behavior of Simultaneous Multiple-Unit Generalizations of the Dutch and English Auctions.” American Economic Review, Dec. 1990, 80(5): 1276-1283.
F. M. Menezes, Four Essays on Auction Theory, University of Illinois doctoral dissertation, Feb. 1993.
U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Joint Report on the Government Securities Market, Washington, D.C. : U.S.G.P.O., Jan. 1992.
Topkis, Donald (1979), “Minimizing a Submodular Function on a Lattice,” Operations Research 28, 358-368.
W. Vickrey, “Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders,” Journal of Finance, Mar. 1961, 16(1): 8-37.
R. Wilson, “Activity Rules for a Power Exchange,” Report to the California Trust for Power Industry Restructuring, Feb. 1997.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4046765

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.