Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Computer graphics processing – Shape generating
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-04
2001-11-20
Brier, Jeffery (Department: 2672)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Computer graphics processing
Shape generating
C345S440000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06320586
ABSTRACT:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
depicts a computer system in which the present invention can be implemented.
FIG. 2
is a block diagram illustrating a software subsystem for controlling the operation of the computer system of FIG.
1
.
FIG. 3
depicts a block a diagram of the present invention.
FIG. 4
depicts a flowchart showing the operation of the present invention.
FIG. 5
illustrates the components of the split pie object with its variables and methods.
FIG. 6
is a sample table of data to which the present invention could be applied.
FIG. 7
is a flowchart depicting the generation of the split pie chart.
FIG. 8
is an illustration of a split pie chart of the present invention.
FIG. 9
is a sample table with three sets of sales figures.
FIG. 10
is a flowchart depicting the additional calculation which occurs when constructing a split pie chart with more than two sets of data points.
FIG. 11
is an example of a pie chart split three ways.
FIG. 12
depicts a pie chart of the present invention with the geographic variable feature included.
FIG. 13
depicts a flowchart of the process of generating a pie chart of with the inclusive geographic variable.
FIG. 14
is a flowchart depicting the additional calculation performed to generate a split pie chart with the third dimension of width.
FIG. 15
depicts the split pie chart with a third dimension.
FIG. 16
depicts a split pie chart where each wedge has its own width.
FIG. 17
depicts a flowchart showing the generation of a split pie chart taking into account Stevens' law.
FIG. 18
depicts the present invention with tick marks placed around the circumference of the split pie chart.
FIG. 19
depicts the present invention with the tick marks placed around the circumference of the larger split in a circle.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the computer processing field, it is common to store data in a commercial database system and to retrieve such data using a computer system. It is also common to display such information in a variety of ways, each of which is suited for displaying a particular type or quantity of data. Many options are available for presenting data, especially with the advent of word processors, spreadsheets, and graphics software programs for creating tables and graphs.
In order to communicate information decisions effectively to users, designers need to understand the tasks in which readers engage when they look at displays. Because the user's tasks require certain sensory, perceptual and cognitive operations, one has to consider what type of information the user is trying to ascertain in reading the graph. For example, a well-designed line graph makes it easier to discern the slopes of lines, whereas, if the user's goal is to determine actual values at certain points, differentiating slopes is of little value.
There are various factors in making a decision about how to present data. The first factor concerns the amount of data being presented. When presenting a small amount of data, authors should weigh the communicative benefits of tabular or graphical presentation against the reader's cognitive costs. Generally, in this case, tabular presentation is preferred. However, with a large amount of data, the reader's use of the data, especially the degree of precision the reader is likely to need, becomes important. If relations are more important than precise values, then the data would probably be best displayed in a graph. Furthermore, readers with a general interest in a topic but no specific interest, may examine a graph to get the main idea. In contrast, readers who have done extensive work on a topic may examine the data in detail.
Finally, one must then choose the type of graph to present the information. This decision depends on both the characteristics of on the readers and of independent and dependent variables. Generally, common graphs with which all readers are likely to have experience are used: line graphs, bar graphs, pie charts, and scatter plots. The choice of graph type depends on the readers' informational needs. Either a line graph or a bar graph is used if readers need to determine relative or absolute amounts. A line graph is used if readers need to determine the rate of increase of the dependent (criterion) variable as a function of changes in the independent (predictor) variable. A bar graph is used if readers need to determine the difference between the means of the dependent variable across different levels of the independent variable. A pie chart is used if readers need to determine proportions but not absolute amounts.
Another important factor in the design of visual displays is the general relation between physical amount and perceived amount as a power function: perceived amount=a(physical amount)
b
, known as Stevens' law. When the exponent b=1.0, the increase in perceived amount corresponds to the increase in the physical amount; when b<1.0, the perceived amount increases more rapidly than the physical amount. Because the physical dimensions that display simple linear data extending in either vertical height or horizontal length produce Stevens' law exponents of 1.0, a reader's perception of the bar graphs and line graphs will accurately correspond to the physical distances shown in the graph. In contrast, the physical dimensions of the area of a rectangle or a circle and the volume of a cube typically produce exponents in Stevens' law of less than 1.0, resulting in an incorrect estimation of the size of indicators. Use of the lightness of shades of gray typically produces an exponent in Stevens' law of greater than 1.0.
As per the foregoing, it has always been a goal of the prior art to improve methods of displaying data in a graphically appealing format in order to allow a user to easily ascertain information by viewing the visual display. There is a need in the prior art for a method of displaying data such that relative amounts of data can be clearly visualized with an element of comparison included.
It is an object of the present invention to transmit as much information to the user in an organized manner such that the ease with which the user can view and understand the information is maximized.
It is an object of the present invention to display data such that a user can not only ascertain relative amounts within a set of data but also the relativity between multiple sets of data.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a means to compare two sets of data corresponding to the same real world parameters with one variable change, such as time period.
It is a further object of the present invention to place this comparative graphic display on a graphic image of a map to add the further variable of geographic location.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a system and method for the visual display of data in an interactive split pie chart. The pie chart can display multiple sets of dependent variables in relation to at least two other variables, such as time and place. In a preferred embodiment, the split pie chart is split into two sections each corresponding to a different time period, however, any number of sections can be used as is graphically feasible. Each section is divided into wedges corresponding to different variables and their values in the two different time periods. The sizes of the sections are adjusted to demonstrate the relative sizes of the sum total of the two sets of data. Finally, the chart itself is geographically placed on a graphic image of a map. The computer system of the present invention interfaces with a data storage mechanism where the values for the different variables are stored. The user customizes the variables of the pie chart by inputting specific requests into a user interface. The user interface then in turn submits a query to the data storage mechanism for data retrieval. The data storage mechanism returns the values to be used as inputs for the visual display system for the creation of the interactive split pie chart.
REF
Elliott Keith
Good Michael
Plattner Hasso
Wilson, III John M.
Brier Jeffery
Finnegan, Henderson Farabow, Garrett and Dunner L.L.P.
Good-Johnson Motilewa
SAP Aktiengesellschaft
LandOfFree
System an method for the visual display of data in an... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System an method for the visual display of data in an..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System an method for the visual display of data in an... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2582251