Synchronizing signal separating apparatus and method

Details Synchronizing signal separating apparatus and method Synchronizing signal separating apparatus and method

2008-07-01

2008-07-01

Yenke, Brian P. (Department: 2622)

Television

Synchronization

Sync separation

C348S521000, C348S524000, C348S529000, C348S530000, C348S531000, C348S086000, C375S140000, C307S328000, C358S461000, C358S461000, C358S461000, C358S461000, C358S461000

Reissue Patent

active

RE040411

ABSTRACT:
This invention is a method and apparatus for identifying and separating the synchronizing signal component of video like signals by identifying or detecting the arrangement or sequence of the known occurances of events or patterns of the sync. The invention also provides for establishing data slicing references in response to the levels of known portions of the sync component.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3569844 (1971-03-01), Lynn
patent: 3706847 (1972-12-01), Smeulers
patent: 3819859 (1974-06-01), Borsuk et al.
patent: 4097896 (1978-06-01), Avery
patent: 4115811 (1978-09-01), Goff
patent: 4233629 (1980-11-01), Dayton
patent: 4298890 (1981-11-01), Lai et al.
patent: 4305091 (1981-12-01), Cooper
patent: 4313135 (1982-01-01), Cooper
patent: 4385319 (1983-05-01), Hasegawa
patent: 4498141 (1985-02-01), Cooper
patent: 4520393 (1985-05-01), Zwijsen et al.
patent: 4532541 (1985-07-01), Cooper
patent: 4573070 (1986-02-01), Cooper
patent: 4665431 (1987-05-01), Cooper
patent: 4680633 (1987-07-01), Gerdes
patent: 4703355 (1987-10-01), Cooper
patent: 4812907 (1989-03-01), Hathaway et al.
patent: 4816830 (1989-03-01), Cooper
patent: 4829257 (1989-05-01), Cooper
patent: 4866543 (1989-09-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 4868428 (1989-09-01), Cooper
patent: 4872070 (1989-10-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 4882624 (1989-11-01), Sumiyoshi
patent: RE33535 (1991-02-01), Cooper
patent: 5012340 (1991-04-01), Kirschenstein
patent: 5097218 (1992-03-01), Cooper
patent: 5202761 (1993-04-01), Cooper
patent: 5260790 (1993-11-01), Takayama
patent: 5424780 (1995-06-01), Cooper
patent: 5432559 (1995-07-01), Bruins et al.
patent: 5459524 (1995-10-01), Cooper
patent: 5486869 (1996-01-01), Cooper
patent: 5530483 (1996-06-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 5543743 (1996-08-01), Cooper
patent: 5548236 (1996-08-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 5550594 (1996-08-01), Cooper
patent: 5572261 (1996-11-01), Cooper
patent: 5592508 (1997-01-01), Cooper
patent: 5635725 (1997-06-01), Cooper
patent: 5675277 (1997-10-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 5675388 (1997-10-01), Cooper
patent: 5751368 (1998-05-01), Cooper
patent: 5754250 (1998-05-01), Cooper
patent: 5793053 (1998-08-01), Cooper
patent: 5834747 (1998-11-01), Cooper
patent: 5874910 (1999-02-01), Cooper
patent: 5920842 (1999-07-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 5946049 (1999-08-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 5949087 (1999-09-01), Cooper
patent: 5996906 (1999-12-01), Cooper
patent: 6078038 (2000-06-01), Cooper
patent: 6098046 (2000-08-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 6141057 (2000-10-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 6191407 (2001-02-01), Cooper
patent: 6308890 (2001-10-01), Cooper
patent: 6330033 (2001-12-01), Cooper
patent: 6351281 (2002-02-01), Cooper
patent: 6392707 (2002-05-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 6421636 (2002-07-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 6469741 (2002-10-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 6529637 (2003-03-01), Cooper
patent: 1143241 (1969-02-01), None
patent: 2200011 (1987-12-01), None
patent: 57-97274 (1982-06-01), None
patent: 58-178669 (1983-10-01), None
patent: 58-186270 (1983-10-01), None
Compiation re: Element c) of Claim 33 of U.S. Patent No. 5,754,250 (1 page).
Document entitled “Validity '869 Patent” (26 pages).
Document entitled “Validity '250 Patent” (32 pages).
Technology Licensing Corporationv.Gennum Corporation, E-Filed May 4, 2007, Document No. 925, Case No. C 01-04204 RS, “Opinion and Order”, Honorable Richard Seeborg—Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, pp. 1-43.
Technology Licensing Corporationv.Gennum Corporation, E-Filed Jun. 1, 2007, Document No. 931, Case No. C 01-4204 RS, “Judgment”, Honorable Richard Seeborg—Judge, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, pp. 1-3.
Technology Licensing Corporationv.Gennum Corporation, E-Filed Jun. 1, 2007, Document No. 930, Case No. C 01-4204 RS, “Order re Entry of Final Judgment”, Honorable Richard Seeborg—Judge, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, pp. 1-3.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Trial Day 1, Oct. 16, 2006, Case No. C-01-4204 RS, Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States Magistrate Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, vol. 1, pp. 1-241.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Oct. 17, 2006, Morning Session, Case No. C-01-4204 RS, Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States Magistrate Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, vol. 2, pp. 242-355.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Oct. 17, 2006, PM Session, Case No. C-01-4204 RS, Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States Magistrate Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, vol. 2, pp. 356-454.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Oct. 18, 2006 Case No. C-01-4204 RS, Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States Magistrate Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, vol. 3, pp. 455-716.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Oct. 19, 2006, Case No. C-01-4204 RS, Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States Magistrate Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, vol. 4, pp. 717-980.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Oct. 20, 2006, Case No. C-01-4204 RS, Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States Magistrate Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, vol. 5, pp. 981-1228.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Oct. 23, 2006, Case No. C-01-4204 RS, Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States Magistrate Judge, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, vol. 6, pp. 1229-1454.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Filed Nov. 21, 2006, Document 904, Case No. C 01-4204-RS, “Gennum's Post Trial Brief”, Honorable Richard Seeborg—Judge, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, pp. 1-41.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Filed Nov. 21, 2006, Document 905, Case No. C 01-4204-RS, “Gennum's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, Honorable Richard Seeborg—Judge, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, pp. 1-111.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Filed Nov. 21, 2006, Document 906, Case No. CV-01-4204 RS, “Technology Licensing Corporation's Post-Trial Brief”, Honorable Richard Seeborg—Judge, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, pp. 1-44.
Technology Licensing Corporationvs.Gennum Corporation, Filed Nov. 21, 2006, Document 907, Case No. CV-01-4204 RS, “Technology Licensing Corporation's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, Honorable Richard Seeborg, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, pp. 1-274.
Plaintiff Technology Licensing Corporation's Opposition To Gennum's Motions For Summary Judgement Of Noninfringement Of U.S. Patent No. 5,754,250 for Case No. CV-01-4204 CRB in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Nov. 7, 2003.
Addendum To Expert Reports of Richard Kupnicki For Defendant Gennum Corporation for Case No. CV-01-4204 CRB in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.
Gennum's Opposition To TLC's Renewed Motion To Stay pending the Outcome of Reissue Proceedings for Case No. CV-01-4204 RS in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Se

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Synchronizing signal separating apparatus and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Synchronizing signal separating apparatus and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Synchronizing signal separating apparatus and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2784791