Radiant energy – Photocells; circuits and apparatus – Optical or pre-photocell system
Reissue Patent
1997-12-19
2002-07-02
Allen, Stephone B. (Department: 2878)
Radiant energy
Photocells; circuits and apparatus
Optical or pre-photocell system
C250S229000, C361S189000
Reissue Patent
active
RE037777
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to machine controls, and more particularly to a switch assembly for initiating or changing a mode of operation of a machine.
2. Description of the Prior Art
It has long been known to use a spaced pair of manually operable switches (often of the type known as palm buttons) to activate the operational modes of machines such as stamping presses, riveters, tube benders, spot welders or the like. The purpose of the spaced pair of manually operable switches is to ensure that both hands of the worker are positioned away from the machine prior to operation. For this purpose of safety, the switches of such a machine must be operated simultaneously and must be spaced sufficiently far apart or otherwise suitably obstructed to prevent simultaneous actuation of the switches with a single hand. The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, of course, sets the criteria which must be met by such machine operating equipment, to ensure adequate worker safety.
A schematic of a conventional control circuit for such machines is shown in FIG.
4
. The circuit includes a pair of palm buttons
110
which each include a spaced pair of electrical contacts
112
and
114
. One contact
112
is disposed in a first limb
116
of a parallel machine operating circuit
118
, while the other contact
114
is disposed in a second limb
120
of the operating circuit
118
. The circuit
118
includes control means
122
for instituting alternative operative modes of a machine
10
, as well as anti-tiedown logic circuitry, as described below. The connection between the machine
10
and logic and control circuitry
122
is shown only schematically in
FIG. 4
, since this connection is well known in the art. For example, the control means
122
can first direct the machine to load a part and then direct the machine to operate on the part (not shown).
The palm buttons
110
are spring-biased or pneumatically biased, so that in the absence of the application of an exertive contact by the operator, the contacts
112
complete the limb
116
and cause the control and logic circuitry means
122
to operate the machine
10
in its first mode of operation. When the operator applies exertive contact to the palm buttons
110
, the contacts
112
are moved out of connection to the limb
116
, and the contacts
114
are subsequently moved into connection to the limb
120
. This causes the control means
122
to operate the machine
10
in its second mode of operation.
It is undesirable to use simple single throw switches to replace the palm buttons
110
because this can obviate the protection given to the worker when the second switch is employed. If one switch is left in an operative position while the other switch can be operated by a single hand of a worker, the worker's free hand can become entangled with operative portions of the machine, sometimes resulting in potentially fatal injury. Indeed, it is for this reason that OSHA regulations generally require that existing machines already incorporate anti-tiedown logic circuitry that is, a control to define and limit the intervals of and between activation of the spaced switches so that, in order for actuation to be considered substantially simultaneous (and thereby permit machine operation), the switches typically must both be actuated each time machine operation is desired, and both also actuated within one second of each other. In a known manner this circuitry thus prevents machine operation if one switch is attempted to be continuously actuated, by being tied down. This conventional anti-tiedown logic circuitry and machine control means is not by itself part of the present invention.
While the use of a spaced pair of palm buttons has been adequate for the intended purpose of safety, such buttons are subject to the drawback that the worker must apply significant exertive contact to the palm buttons, in order to achieve actuation of them. A substantial number of machine operators are now recognized as being subject to fatigue from the repetitive application of exertive contact against conventional palm buttons. Indeed, operators are increasingly experiencing inflammation of the tendons, due to this repetitive and forceful action of the fingers and wrists. This inflammation of the tendons of the fingers and wrists is known as Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The ailment has increased worker fatigue and complaints, has decreased productivity and has increased the frequency of disability claims under the workmen's compensation laws and programs. These effects are injurious to the worker and substantially increase the costs associated with operations of the machine in question.
Additionally, palm buttons and like devices are subject to unacceptably great wear and breakage, due in part to the frictional movement of the members making them up, for example, such as the shaft and bore of a conventional palm button. Additionally, contacts such as the button contacts
112
and
114
described above are subject to bending upon repeated mechanical manipulation and impactment against the circuit contact which they abut.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The present invention overcomes these and other drawbacks by providing a machine control which does not require application of exertive contact to the switches incorporated in the machine control. More particularly, the present invention comprises a manually operable switch apparatus useful on machinery having at least one and preferably two disparate modes of operation actuated by energization of a means for controlling each mode of operation. The apparatus comprises a pair of actuation switches which are simultaneously manually operable without the application of exertive contact thereagainst, in contrast to the palm buttons and other switches of the prior art. The actuation switches complete parallel circuits connected to conventional machine control and anti-tiedown circuit means, and are sufficiently spaced apart or otherwise obstructed in a known manner so as to obviate simultaneous operation by a single hand of an operator, as ordinarily required by the relevant safety laws and regulations. Indeed, the optimal utilization of the present invention lies in simply
replaceing
replacing
the existing switches on a machine having such safety controls, with the exertive-contact free switches of the invention.
While each of the actuation switches can comprise a proximity switch, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention the actuation switches each comprise an infrared emitter, paired with an infrared receiver spaced from the emitter a sufficient distance to permit introduction of one or more fingers of the user between them. The switches also preferably comprise a single or double pole, double throw relay having one throw operatively connected to the control and
anti-tiedoen
anti-tiedown
means for each mode of machine operation. The relay is actuated by a solenoid operatively connected to an output of the infrared emitter and receiver.
When the infrared beams of the switches are broken by the fingers of a user, each paired emitter and receiver close a circuit containing the associated solenoid, and energize the control means and anti-tiedown circuitry so as to operate the machine in one mode or another. The simultaneous breaking of the infrared beams of the two spaced switches, when controlled by the anti-tiedown circuit and control means, thus allows actuation of alternative modes of machine operation without requiring the machine operator to apply exertive contact against any switches or other objects, thus avoiding the mechanical breakdown associated with such switches, and the attendant physical effects upon the wrist and finger tendons of the operator.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2174206 (1939-09-01), Etter
patent: 2228780 (1941-01-01), Roberts
patent: RE23674 (1953-06-01), Spierer
patent: 3207957 (1965-09-01), Naylor
patent: 3242341 (1966-03-01), Woodward
patent: 3360654 (1967-12-01), Muller
patent: 3576277 (1971-04-01),
Herman Jeffrey G.
Matzka Mark C.
Allen Stephone B.
Gifford, Krass, Groh Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, P.C.
LandOfFree
Switch apparatus requiring the hand of the operator to... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Switch apparatus requiring the hand of the operator to..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Switch apparatus requiring the hand of the operator to... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2830776