Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Robot control
Reexamination Certificate
2011-08-09
2011-08-09
Tran, Dalena (Department: 3664)
Data processing: generic control systems or specific application
Specific application, apparatus or process
Robot control
C318S568110
Reexamination Certificate
active
07996110
ABSTRACT:
The present invention was developed by a neurosurgeon and seeks to mimic the results of primate neurological research which is indicative of a human's actual neurological control structures and logic. Specifically, the motor proprioceptive and tactile neurophysiology functioning of the surgeon's hands and internal hand control system from the muscular level through the intrafusal fiber system of the neural network is considered in creating the robot and method of operation of the present invention. Therefore, the surgery is not slowed down as in the art, because the surgeon is in conscious and subconscious natural agreement and harmonization with the robotically actuated surgical instruments based on neurological mimicking of the surgeon's behavior with the functioning of the robot. Therefore, the robot can enhance the surgeon's humanly limited senses while not introducing disruptive variables to the surgeon's naturally occurring operation of his neurophysiology. This is therefore also a new field, neurophysiological symbiotic robotics.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4274421 (1981-06-01), Dory et al.
patent: 4418698 (1983-12-01), Dory et al.
patent: 4515017 (1985-05-01), McConaghy
patent: 4592572 (1986-06-01), Instance et al.
patent: 4913155 (1990-04-01), Dow et al.
patent: 4933043 (1990-06-01), Instance et al.
patent: 5152294 (1992-10-01), Mochizuki et al.
patent: 5159931 (1992-11-01), Pini et al.
patent: 5174605 (1992-12-01), Instance et al.
patent: 5460179 (1995-10-01), Okunuki et al.
patent: 5487388 (1996-01-01), Rello et al.
patent: 5762458 (1998-06-01), Wang et al.
patent: 5943914 (1999-08-01), Morimoto et al.
patent: 6000297 (1999-12-01), Morimoto et al.
patent: 6096004 (2000-08-01), Meglan et al.
patent: 6104158 (2000-08-01), Jacobus et al.
patent: 6201984 (2001-03-01), Funda et al.
patent: 6245028 (2001-06-01), Furst et al.
patent: 6416520 (2002-07-01), Kynast et al.
patent: 6463319 (2002-10-01), Bucholz
patent: 6788999 (2004-09-01), Green
patent: 6836703 (2004-12-01), Wang et al.
patent: 6850817 (2005-02-01), Green
patent: 6963792 (2005-11-01), Green
patent: 6999852 (2006-02-01), Green
patent: 7006895 (2006-02-01), Green
patent: 7025064 (2006-04-01), Wang et al.
patent: 7027892 (2006-04-01), Wang et al.
patent: 7074179 (2006-07-01), Wang et al.
patent: 7107124 (2006-09-01), Green
patent: 7198630 (2007-04-01), Lipow
patent: 2002/0082498 (2002-06-01), Wendt et al.
patent: 2002/0120188 (2002-08-01), Brock et al.
patent: 2002/0122174 (2002-09-01), Hamamatsu et al.
patent: 2003/0114962 (2003-06-01), Niemeyer
patent: 2004/0243147 (2004-12-01), Lipow
patent: 2006/0087746 (2006-04-01), Lipow
patent: 2006/0155263 (2006-07-01), Lipow
patent: 2006/0241414 (2006-10-01), Nowlin et al.
patent: WO-00/28882 (2000-05-01), None
Mack, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, 2001, Internet, p. 568-572.
Web page: http://www.globaltechnoscan.com/21stMar-27thMar01/robot.htm, “Robot-assisted brain surgery is feasible . . . ,” Dec. 3, 2002.
Web page: http://www.observer.co.uk/uk.sub.--news/story/0,6903,542571.html, “Brain surgery by robot gives hope to Parkinson's sufferers,” Dec. 3, 2002.
Web page: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,128361,00.html, “Forceps! Scalpel!Robot!” Oct. 18, 2002.
Web page: “The DaVinci Robot,” Cardiothoracic Surgery at the Ohio State University, Nov. 18, 2002.
Articles: “Current Problems in Surgery,” Matthew B. Bloom et al., vol. 39, No. 8, Aug. 2002, Mosby Corporate, pp. 736-739.
Article: “Robotic Surgery,” D. Stoianovici, URobotics Laboratory, World Journal Urology 18:289-295 (2000).
Article: “A review of robotics in surgery,” B. Davies, Proc Instn Mech Engrs, vol. 214, part H, Oct. 22, 1999.
Web page: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full, “Robots in operating theatres,” Nov. 12, 2000.
Article: “Is the Robotic Arm a Cost-effective Surgical Tool?” Karen Dunlap et al., Aorn Journal, Aug. 1998, vol. 68, No. 2.
Article: “Robots in the Operating Room,” Kevin L. Ropp, Cover Story from FDA Consumer in Health, Jul.-Aug. 1993.
Article: “Emerging Technologies for Surgery in the 21.sup.st Century,” Richard M. Satava, Arch Surg, vol. 134, Nov. 1999.
Article: “A Teleoperated Microsurgical Robot and Associated Virtual Environment for Eye Surgery,” Ian W. Hunter et al., Presence, vol. 2, No. 4, fall 1993, 265-280, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Article: “Robotically Driven Interventions: A Method of Using CT Fluoroscopy without Radiation Exposure to the Physician,” Stephen B. Solomon et al., RSNA, 2002.
Article: “Quantitative virtual reality enhances stereotactic neurosurgery,” Patrick Kelly, vol. 80, No. 11, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, Nov. 1995.
Article: “NeuRobot: Telecontrolled Micromanipulator System for Minimally Invasive Microneurosurgery—Preliminary Results,” Kazuhiro Hongo et al., Neurosurgery, vol. 51, No. 4, Oct. 2002, pp. 985-988.
Article: “Robot for CT-Guided Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” H. Fankhauser et al., Proceedings of the XIth Meeting of the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Ixtapa, Mexico, Oct. 11-15, 1993.
Article: “Motion Feedback as a Navigation Aid in Robot Assisted Neurosurgery,” Matthias Wapler et al., Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, IOS Press and Ohmsha, 1998.
Article: “Robotic Three-Dimensional Positioning of a Stimulation Electrode in the Brain,” J-L. Hefti et al., Computer Aided Surgery, 3:1-10 (1998).
Article: “New Dimensions of Neurosurgery in the Realm of High Technology: Possibilities, Practicalities, Realities,” Michael L. J. Apuzzo, Neurosurgery, vol. 38, No. 4, Apr. 1996.
Article: “Application of robotics to stereotactic neurosurgery,” Ronald F. Young, Neurosurgical Research, Jun. 1987, 9(2), pp. 123-128.
Article: “ISG Viewing Wand System,” Neurosurgery, vol. 34, No. 6, Jun. 1994.
Article: “The First Clinical Application of a Hands-On Robotic Knee Surgery System,” M. Jakopec et al., Computer Aided Surgery, 6:329-339 (2001).
Article: “Machining and Accuracy Studies for a Tibial Knee Implant Using a Force-Controlled Robot,” Geert Van Ham et al., Computer Aided Surgery, 3:123-133 (1998).
Article: “Anesthesia for Robotic Heart Surgery: An Overview,” John M. Murkin, The Heart Surgery Forum, #2001-7281, 4(4):311-314, 2001.
Article: “Current Status and Future Directions in Computer-Enhanced Video- and Robotic-Assisted Coronary Bypass Surgery,” W. Douglas Boyd et al., Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 101-109.
Article: “Robotic Stabilization that Assists Cardiac Surgery on Beating Hearts,” Yoshihiko Nakamura et al., Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 2001.
Internet Article: “A Robot that Fixes Hearts,” Rob Younge et al., EBSCOhost Full Display, Source U.S. News and World Report, Dec. 25, 2000-Jan. 1, 2001, vol. 129, Issue 25, p. 50.
Article: “Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control,” Louis R. Kavoussi et al., The Journal of Urology, vol. 154, 2134-2136, Dec. 1995.
Article: “Feasibility of Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery: 146 Cases,” Guy-Bernard Cadiere et al., World Journal of Surgery, 1467-1477, 2001.
Article: “Robot-Assisted Microsurgery: A Feasibility Study in the Rat,” Peter D. Le Roux et al., Neurosurgery, 48(3):584-589, Mar. 2001.
Article: “Intraoperative Instrument Motion Sensing for Microsurgery,” Mario Gomez-Blanco et al., Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference Serving Humanity, Advancing Technology, Oct. 13-16, 1999, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Article: “An Active Hand-held Instrument for Enhanced Microsurgical Accuracy,” Wei Tech Ang et al., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct.
Gregoris Dennis
Lipow Kenneth L.
MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd.
Perkins Coie LLP
Tran Dalena
LandOfFree
Surgical robot and robotic controller does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Surgical robot and robotic controller, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Surgical robot and robotic controller will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2634402