Chemistry of inorganic compounds – Modifying or removing component of normally gaseous mixture – Sulfur or sulfur containing component
Reexamination Certificate
1998-04-20
2002-10-15
Griffin, Steven P. (Department: 1754)
Chemistry of inorganic compounds
Modifying or removing component of normally gaseous mixture
Sulfur or sulfur containing component
C095S224000, C261S115000, C423S243010, C423S244070, C423S244080, C423S235000, C423S239100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06464952
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the field of air pollution control, and is particularly directed to an abatement system to scrub sulfur dioxide and other acid-forming gases from hot industrial gases.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Over the past several decades the control of air pollution has become a priority concern of society. The United States and other countries have developed elaborate regulatory programs aimed at requiring factories and other major sources of air pollution to install the best available control technology (BACT) for removing contaminants from gaseous effluent streams released into the atmosphere. The standards for air pollution control are becoming increasingly stringent, so that there is a constant demand for ever more effective pollution control technologies. In addition the operating costs of running pollution control equipment can be substantial, so there is also a constant demand for more energy efficient technologies.
Two well known types of devices to remove common particulates from a gaseous effluent stream are electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and fabric filter baghouse (FFB) collectors. ESPs are generally recognized as being capable of a high particle collection efficiency of fine particles when the particles have the proper electrical resistivity. FFBs are also generally recognized as being capable of a high particle collection efficiency of fine particles when the particles have the proper characteristics. Typically, pollutant gases are conditioned such that the particulates can be more efficiently filtered by ESPs or FFBs.
However, ESPs and FFBs do not remove many gaseous chemicals. Certain species of acid-forming gases can penetrate conventional particulate collection devices such as ESPs or FFBs resulting in emissions violations, causing downstream corrosion of components, and contributing to visible condensed particles which form typically after exiting the stack. In particular, ESPs and FFBs do not remove sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride, or other gases that form acids when dissolved in water.
The acid-forming gases that may be released from an air pollution control system with ESPs or FFBs may violate pollution control standards, may contribute to the “detached plume” phenomena and may contribute to acid rain. Consequently, pollution control systems for applications generating large quantities of acid forming gases, such as coal-fired power plants, often require additional means to scrub acid forming gases from the effluent stream. Other applications where the emission of acid forming gases may be a problem include small coal-fired boilers, municipal waste incinerators, and medical waste incinerators.
Acid forming gases may contribute to the formation of visible plumes of effluent that violate opacity regulations even though the total quantity of acid forming gases released into the atmosphere is comparatively minor. For example, one air pollution control problem for cement plants is the formation of a detached plume. Experimental studies have identified the detached plumes as being comprised primarily of ammonium sulfate and ammonium chloride particulates that form and condense as the emissions from the stack cools in the atmosphere a distance from the stack. The ammonium particulates are in a size range of approximately one micron, which is a size that is efficient at scattering and reflecting light. The small size of the particulates and their high scattering efficiency means that an optically opaque plume can be comprised of a comparatively small total mass of ammonium sulfate and ammonium chloride particulates. These detached plumes consist of a fine white plume that may last for hours or days depending on plant and atmospheric conditions. The plumes are highly noticeable and may violate pollution control regulations for opacity, and are thus a potentially serious problem.
Modern cement plants typically use ESPs or FFBs to reduce particulate emissions. However, these particulate filters do not remove the component chemicals that form detached plumes. In particular, ESPs and FFBs do not capture gaseous sulfur dioxide and gaseous hydrogen chloride which contribute to the chemical reactions that form detached plumes. In principle, an additional chemical scrubber could be added immediately after an ESP or FFB. However, conventional methods to scrub acid forming gases are typically expensive and inconsistent with the economic operation of an energy efficient cement plant. For example, conventional wet scrubbers, which commonly use spray droplet sizes greater than 1000 microns, typically use 10-100 gallons per minute of scrubbing liquid to scrub 1000 standard cubic feet per minute of effluent gases (1-10 kilograms of liquid per kilogram of gas). Consequently, the consumption of water, scrubbing chemicals, and energy is large for conventional liquid scrubbers.
Modern energy efficient cement plants typically use two methods to cool and condition hot process gases before they enter an ESP or FFB. In a first stage of cooling, a gas conditioning tower (GCT) uses a spray of water to cool and condition the gaseous effluent. A second stage of cooling and conditioning is performed by passing the partially-cooled effluent through the cool wet limestone of the feed mill supplying fresh meal to the kiln, when the feed mill is operational.
Typically, the hot cement kiln gases must be cooled to approximately 150° C. to have acceptable emissions from an ESP or cooled to approximately 180° C. to protect a FFB from overheating. When the feed mill is on, the gas conditioning tower typically must only cool the gaseous effluent to around 250° C. In the mill-on state, the effluent is further cooled to between 100° C. to 150° C. as a result of passing through the feed meal. However, when the feed mill is shut off, the cooling tower must provide all of the cooling. There are thus two distinct operational states of the cement plant, corresponding to a mill-on and a mill-off condition.
One attempted solution to the problem of sulfur dioxide emissions from a cement plant is to inject a lime slurry into the spray used to cool the GCT. A lime slurry is a desirable scrubbing material because lime is chemically compatible with other chemical constituents of cement. The cement will not be deleteriously contaminated if small quantities of lime enter the feed meal subsequent to the GCT. The chemicals in the lime slurry react with sulfur dioxide to produce thermally stable salts, thereby reducing sulfur dioxide emissions. However, conventional approaches to injecting a lime slurry into the cooling water of a GCT have low collection efficiencies and consume large quantities of lime slurry (see, e.g., Satish H. Sheth, “SO
2
Emissions History and Scrubbing History”, pp. 213-217, 33
rd
IEEE Cement Industry Conference, Mexico City, Mexico May 1991). Conventional approaches to reducing sulfur dioxide emissions from cement plants are not consistent with high sulfur dioxide collection efficiencies (e.g., greater than about 50%) with low molar ratios (e.g., less than about 3) of calcium hydroxide to sulfur dioxide. In some applications the maximum achievable sulfur dioxide collection efficiency may be unacceptably low, even at extremely high molar ratios of calcium hydroxide to sulfur dioxide. The large lime consumption required in conventional lime slurry injection schemes increases the operating cost and exacerbates the problems of the clogging and plugging of valves and nozzles. Additionally, the cost of the lime is further increased in conventional lime slurry injection schemes utilizing filtered slaked lime because only a fraction of the slaked lime ends up in the filtered slurry.
There are several factors that have previously made the use of a lime slurry in a GCT spray an inefficient and impractical means to scrub acidic forming gases in conventional pollution control systems used in cement plants. Some of these factors tend to limit the collection efficiency. Generally, the total quantity of spray in a GCT is kept as low as possible to reduce
Coudert Brothers LLP
EnviroCare International, Inc.
Griffin Steven P.
Strickland Jonas N.
LandOfFree
Sulfur dioxide abatement method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Sulfur dioxide abatement method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sulfur dioxide abatement method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2932246