Material or article handling – Apparatus for moving material between zones having different...
Reexamination Certificate
1999-11-30
2002-05-07
Bratlie, Steven A. (Department: 3652)
Material or article handling
Apparatus for moving material between zones having different...
C414S939000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06382895
ABSTRACT:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application corresponds to Japanese Patent Application No. H10-374548, filed Dec. 28, 1998, in Japan, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a substrate processing devices that subjects a substrate to a prescribed process.
2. Description of Related Art
The surfaces of substrates are subjected to many prescribed processes in the production of electronic devices such as LSIs (large-scale integrated circuits) and display devices such as liquid crystal displays. For example, the production of an LSI involves film deposition processes to form various conducting films and insulating films on the surface of a substrate, and etching processes to form prescribed patterns in the substrate surface. The substrate processing apparatus that performs this sort of substrate processing can be broadly divided into batch processing apparatus that process a plurality of substrates all at the same time, and single substrate-processing apparatus that process substrates individually. A common type of batch processing apparatus is an oxidization apparatus that uses a furnace, but a single-substrate-processing apparatus is often used for film deposition and etching to achieve better uniformity and reproducibility of the processing on different wafers.
The simplest configuration of a single-wafer processing apparatus is a process chamber that performs a prescribed process. In this configuration, substrates are individually transferred into and processed in the process chamber, and are individually removed therefrom. However, a problem with such a configuration is that the interior of the process chamber is exposed to the outside atmosphere whenever a substrate is inserted or removed, thus impairing the processing quality. In particular, when the process chamber is a vacuum chamber that uses a vacuum, such as in a film deposition apparatus or an etching apparatus, opening the chamber to the atmosphere when inserting and removing a substrate makes it necessary to evacuate the process chamber every time a process is performed, leading to poor productivity. To avoid such problems, a load lock chamber is normally provided in which the substrate is left temporarily when it is inserted and removed, and this load lock chamber is hermetically connected to the process chamber. When the gate valve between the process chamber and load lock chamber is open, the gate valve on the atmospheric side of the load lock chamber is kept closed, so the process chamber is not directly exposed to the atmosphere in this configuration.
On the other hand, with the increasing functionality and complexity of manufactured products such as electronic devices, the processes to which substrates are subjected have also become more complex. Specifically, these products tend to be produced by performing many different processes on a substrate. In the abovementioned apparatus that uses a vacuum environment, it would be desirable to have the ability to perform different processes consecutively in vacuo. This is because if the next process is performed once the substrate has been re-exposed to the atmosphere, the atmospheric exposure can result in contamination of the substrate surface.
To meet this demand for consecutive in vacuo processing, multi-chamber type apparatus equipped with a plurality of process chambers have been developed. The first multi-chamber type apparatus to be developed was an in-line apparatus where a plurality of process chambers were arranged in a row. A transfer mechanism was used to transfer substrates in vacuo along the arrangement of the plurality of process chambers, thereby performing consecutive processing by transporting the substrates to each process chamber in turn. Separation chambers—which are fitted with a robot to transfer substrates—are often disposed between each process chamber to prevent cross-contamination of the atmospheres between each process chamber. In other words, the plurality of process chambers are arranged with separation chambers interspersed between them.
However, in the abovementioned in-line apparatus, the line gets longer every time the number of process chambers is increased to allow a greater number of processes to be performed. The number of intervening separation chambers also increases as the number of process chambers increases, and so there has been the disadvantage that the line gets progressively longer. As a result, there have been disadvantages in that the apparatus takes up a greater area and the configuration of the transfer mechanism gets more complex.
Cluster tool type apparatus has been developed to solve such drawbacks. A cluster tool type apparatus has a configuration whereby a plurality of load lock chambers and a plurality of process chambers are arranged around a single separation chamber. Cluster tool type substrate processing apparatus are currently in widespread use in single-substrate processing applications.
FIG. 7
is an outline plan view of a cluster tool type substrate processing apparatus as one example of a conventional substrate processing apparatus.
The apparatus shown in
FIG. 7
consists of a centrally provided separation chamber
8
, with a plurality of process chambers
1
and load lock chambers
2
disposed around separation chamber
8
. Each of the chambers
1
,
2
and
8
is equipped with a dedicated or shared evacuation system, and is thereby pumped down to the prescribed pressure. Also, a gate valve
5
is provided at the connection positions of each chamber
1
,
2
and
8
. A transfer mechanism
42
is provided inside separation chamber
8
as a transfer mechanism to transfer substrate
9
in vacuo.
A processed substrate
9
is accommodated in load lock chamber
2
by an auto loader (not illustrated). A substrate
9
inside load lock chamber
2
is sequentially transferred into process chamber
1
by transfer mechanism
42
provided inside separation chamber
8
, and is subjected to the prescribed processing. When the prescribed series of processes on substrate
9
has been completed, substrate
9
is put back in load lock chamber
2
by transfer mechanism
42
. After that, it is taken out to the atmosphere by the auto loader (not illustrated).
In the abovementioned cluster tool type substrate processing apparatus, the plurality of process chambers is not disposed in a linear fashion, but is disposed in a ring around a single separation chamber. Consequently, it has advantages in that it is possible to reduce the area it takes up compared with an in-line type of apparatus, and in that the configuration of the transfer mechanism is not complex.
However, recent further increases in the complexity and speed of substrate processing and the increasing size of substrates have meant that even the cluster tool type apparatus described above is starting to reach the limits of its capabilities. Specifically, now that the processes performed on substrates are becoming even faster and more complex due to the demand for devices with greater integration density, increased functionality and lower cost, it is becoming necessary to equip the apparatus with even more process chambers. There are two main reasons why the number of process chambers must be further increased. One is that the number of processes to be performed on substrates is continuing to increase, as mentioned above. The other is to divide the same process between a plurality of chambers in order to increase throughput.
If one tries to increase the number of process chambers in the layout shown in
FIG. 7
, the perimeter of the separation chamber has to be increased. That is, the cross-sectional area of the separation chamber has to be increased. As the separation chamber gets larger, the apparatus takes up a correspondingly larger area. Also, as the chamber increases in size, the vacuum pump system that evacuates it must also be made more large scale. But the separation chamber itself is essentially wasted space as far
Konishi Akio
Takahashi Nobuyuki
Anelva Corporation
Bratlie Steven A.
Burns Doane , Swecker, Mathis LLP
LandOfFree
Substrate processing apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Substrate processing apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Substrate processing apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2819588